Page 3 of 4 [ 57 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

mar00
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 May 2011
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 603
Location: Germany

26 Jan 2012, 11:09 am

Mdyar wrote:
mar, what difference does it really make though. Your trajectory cannot practically, definitively and ultimately be gauged under determinism. What we experience as free will (however illusory it may seem in a context "outside" ourselves- we are at the end of those strings, dancing about at the pull on these. ) is the only thing that it is at all meaningful for the term to refer to; that is, what we experience as free will is free will.

Only a difference of truth! The subject has been a victim of delusional speculation; it's also an amazing example of how science can contribute to answering such 'spiritual' questions.



Mdyar
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 May 2009
Age: 61
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,516

26 Jan 2012, 11:23 am

The worm has free will.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

26 Jan 2012, 2:12 pm

Mdyar wrote:
The worm has free will.


How would you know? Are you a worm?

ruveyn



Sunshine7
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 11 Nov 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 218

26 Jan 2012, 2:17 pm

Can I choose to not believe in free will?



Mdyar
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 May 2009
Age: 61
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,516

26 Jan 2012, 4:50 pm

ruveyn wrote:
Mdyar wrote:
The worm has free will.


How would you know?
ruveyn

As I've stated before, all our actions, conscious or otherwise, are tantamount to *instinct* as in following a program. Who's to say where the threshold lies between "instinct" and (free)will Is this distinction due to our options being nearly infinite as the only difference?

As I said before, it is free in only the way we experience this. Both make choices, both are merely brains.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

26 Jan 2012, 5:10 pm

Mdyar wrote:

As I said before, it is free in only the way we experience this. Both make choices, both are merely brains.


You know too much. Perhaps you are a worm.

ruveyn



Sunshine7
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 11 Nov 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 218

27 Jan 2012, 4:10 pm

Quote:
Who's to say where the threshold lies between "instinct" and (free)will


CNS-triggered instincts like jerking away from a hot stove and the startle reflex, and conscious thought in the frontal lobe, are already quite well-mapped by neuroscientists.

Even if it wasn't, yours is an appeal to ignorance anyway; if we cannot say where the threshold lies, then it must be non-existent.



Mdyar
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 May 2009
Age: 61
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,516

27 Jan 2012, 7:14 pm

Sunshine7 wrote:
Quote:
Who's to say where the threshold lies between "instinct" and (free)will


CNS-triggered instincts like jerking away from a hot stove and the startle reflex, and conscious thought in the frontal lobe, are already quite well-mapped by neuroscientists.

Even if it wasn't, yours is an appeal to ignorance anyway; if we cannot say where the threshold lies, then it must be non-existent.


My contention is with the construct of "instinct" and *non-extinct* as even existent. Why is there or why should there be a real defined threshold/ boundary between the two?

Does conscious thought follow, based on the sense impressions of our experience, as stemming from an emotive generator of good or bad memory storage,( hence "values") that create Free Will?
It is all sense impressions in one way or another; why is there this concept of free will on this "conscious" end?

As said, either way there is a * choice generator* that will make a choice based on sensory input and the latter with greater (memory) retrieval. One has more range than the other.



Last edited by Mdyar on 03 Feb 2012, 1:15 am, edited 1 time in total.

jackmt
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 13 Dec 2011
Age: 71
Gender: Male
Posts: 116
Location: Missoula, MT

27 Jan 2012, 8:44 pm

Free will is an illusion that allows me to congratulate myself for making better choices than you or causes me to kick myself if I don't. After all, we have the same options available, right? No. I only have a choice of something if I have the power and skills to take that option. But having them doesn't require that that option be taken. I will choose that which I perceive to be in my greatest interest from all the available options I correctly perceive to be available. That is the way we are all programmed.

Altruism, in the sense of sacrificing oneself for a stranger, is never a choice, but an unthinking instantaneous response to a stimulus. Otherwise it is just enlightened self-interest.



thedaywalker
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Nov 2008
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 736

28 Jan 2012, 2:41 pm

there are some people right now researching if quantum physical effects in the brain may be present and if so if they could be viewed as being free will. i personaly do believe in free wil for in a fixed system that doesn't alow for free will perception is not acounted for. i am for i percieve and i am as free as i percieve myself to be.



donnie_darko
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,981

28 Jan 2012, 9:01 pm

Sunshine7 wrote:
Can I choose to not believe in free will?


I don't think people can really choose their beliefs. If that was true, the saying 'i want to believe' wouldn't really make much sense would it?



donnie_darko
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,981

28 Jan 2012, 9:03 pm

thedaywalker wrote:
there are some people right now researching if quantum physical effects in the brain may be present and if so if they could be viewed as being free will. i personaly do believe in free wil for in a fixed system that doesn't alow for free will perception is not acounted for. i am for i percieve and i am as free as i percieve myself to be.


I think we perceive our will as free, and even though I don't believe it truly is 'free' since i think the concept of free will itself doesn't really mean anything, that's good enough for me!

As for the quantum effects, you COULD say that was free will, but you could also just say the Universe has a random element. I guess God maybe does play dice after all.



Sunshine7
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 11 Nov 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 218

30 Jan 2012, 12:06 pm

Quote:
Sunshine7 wrote:
Can I choose to not believe in free will?

I don't think people can really choose their beliefs. If that was true, the saying 'i want to believe' wouldn't really make much sense would it?


Reeaaaally think about it. (:



techstepgenr8tion
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2005
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 24,682
Location: 28th Path of Tzaddi

30 Jan 2012, 3:25 pm

Saturn wrote:
I tend to the view that there is no free-will in the sense that everything that happens is a result of what has happened before. I don't see how it is possible for something to spontaneousely occur that is not part of this deterministic process. That is not to say that novel things cannot arise, only that we are incapable of any intervention in the process.

Let me see otherwise if you can.

I can't; that's pretty well air tight and in line with my own perception.


_________________
The loneliest part of life: it's not just that no one is on your cloud, few can even see your cloud.


91
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Oct 2010
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,063
Location: Australia

01 Feb 2012, 8:43 pm

techstepgenr8tion wrote:
Saturn wrote:
I tend to the view that there is no free-will in the sense that everything that happens is a result of what has happened before. I don't see how it is possible for something to spontaneousely occur that is not part of this deterministic process. That is not to say that novel things cannot arise, only that we are incapable of any intervention in the process.

Let me see otherwise if you can.

I can't; that's pretty well air tight and in line with my own perception.


For myself, I think hard-determinism is a very radical claim. The problem of determinism certainly does provides us will pause to question free will, in the definitional sense but not necessarily as a concept. When you find that your own internal definition of free will does not work with determinism or indeterminism, the best place to start is not in surrender: rather I would suggest you take a look at the hundreds of definitions of free will take work just fine with determinism; each allowing certain degrees of freedom or less, depending on the factors it is working with. Either way, it at least persuades me, that the two concepts are not necessarily mutually exclusive. Embracing hard-determinism within the discipline of the study of free will means stating that all of those definitions do not work or cannot be made to work: hence why it is considered so radical.


_________________
Life is real ! Life is earnest!
And the grave is not its goal ;
Dust thou art, to dust returnest,
Was not spoken of the soul.


abacacus
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Apr 2007
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,380

01 Feb 2012, 8:45 pm

I have serious issues believing that ANYTHING is predetermined.

I can choose to do pretty much whatever I want (within the law), that choice is not made for me.


_________________
A shot gun blast into the face of deceit
You'll gain your just reward.
We'll not rest until the purge is complete
You will reap what you've sown.