American Constitution Losing Appeal
Raptor is a hardcore Conservative from what I've seen, one of those types that prefers to ignore reality and instead would rather focus on trying to implement concepts that don't work.
_________________
A shot gun blast into the face of deceit
You'll gain your just reward.
We'll not rest until the purge is complete
You will reap what you've sown.
rabbittss wrote:
Well I didn’t say “hate” but now that you’ve gone there so be it.
I find it rather hypocritical that we hear all this screeching from the left about hate speech and howling for the passage of hate crime legislation yet you hate someone for having an opinion that is differs from yours. I guess you just redefine hate to suit your needs, eh?
abacacus wrote:
Well I’m not really a hard a core conservative but thanks for the compliment just the same.
And you’ve got it kinda backwards; conservatives acknowledge reality but refuse to give credit to concepts that don’t work in reality.
Don't you support trickle down economics? Which don't work, never have and never will?
That would give credence to the hypothesis that conservatives are delusional ![]()
_________________
A shot gun blast into the face of deceit
You'll gain your just reward.
We'll not rest until the purge is complete
You will reap what you've sown.
Yup, the electoral college is one thing that desperately has got to be fixed.. a good way to do that would be for states not to be 'Winner-take-all' which is grossly unfair to their citizens. Idealy I'd prefer to just get rid of it..
I also think it should be a mandatory minimum requirement to be a politician that you have to have a Masters Degree in an applicable field.. no more Pizza chain kings, podunk mayors, or real estate agents running for President.. treat it as you would any other high profile, high stress management position. Just try and get elected president of a company without an MBA...
Nonsense. Bill Gates, Paul Allen, Steve Jobs, Richard Branson, and that's just off the top of my head for guys that don't have any college degree let alone a masters.
Saying you need a masters or equivalent is a ridiculous elitist position to hold for somebody that probably harps about inequality.
Well I didn’t say “hate” but now that you’ve gone there so be it.
I find it rather hypocritical that we hear all this screeching from the left about hate speech and howling for the passage of hate crime legislation yet you hate someone for having an opinion that is differs from yours. I guess you just redefine hate to suit your needs, eh?
abacacus wrote:
Well I’m not really a hard a core conservative but thanks for the compliment just the same.
And you’ve got it kinda backwards; conservatives acknowledge reality but refuse to give credit to concepts that don’t work in reality.
I'm actually Third Way*. I'm neither left, nor right. Some of my social views would probably scare the pants off of you.
Saying you need a masters or equivalent is a ridiculous elitist position to hold for somebody that probably harps about inequality.
Damn right. I don't want people who aren't smart running things. Those men are FLUKES, they are not the norm.
*was informed I was using the wrong term, so I changed it.
Last edited by rabbittss on 08 Feb 2012, 9:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
We must remember that our current Constitution was already a "redo" from the original Articles of Confederation, and for the time, our Constitution was the state of the art in political science, incorporating ideas from influential Enlightenment thinkers like Montesquieu (separation of powers), Rousseau (popular sovereignty), Voltaire (individual liberties), and John Locke (again, individual liberties). It incorporated a few grievances from around the Revolutionary War (quartering of British troops in Boston, for example). Still, hindsight is 20:20, and I'd add a stronger separation of church and state, a right to privacy, and various "positive liberties."
Saying you need a masters or equivalent is a ridiculous elitist position to hold for somebody that probably harps about inequality.
Damn right. I don't want people who aren't smart running things. Those men are FLUKES, they are not the norm.
Intelligence ≠ getting degrees
I'm hoping you meant 'Third Way' instead of 'Third Position'. Third Position is another term for fascism. If not then there isn't much use arguing with you, all I got to say is follow your leader.
Last edited by Jacoby on 08 Feb 2012, 9:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Well I didn’t say “hate” but now that you’ve gone there so be it.
I find it rather hypocritical that we hear all this screeching from the left about hate speech and howling for the passage of hate crime legislation yet you hate someone for having an opinion that is differs from yours. I guess you just redefine hate to suit your needs, eh?
abacacus wrote:
Well I’m not really a hard a core conservative but thanks for the compliment just the same.
And you’ve got it kinda backwards; conservatives acknowledge reality but refuse to give credit to concepts that don’t work in reality.
I'm actually Third Position. I'm neither left, nor right. Some of my social views would probably scare the pants off of you.
Saying you need a masters or equivalent is a ridiculous elitist position to hold for somebody that probably harps about inequality.
Damn right. I don't want people who aren't smart running things. Those men are FLUKES, they are not the norm.
Big Government = Liberal
Nanny state = Liberal
That's about all I need to see to close the case..........
Scare me? No.
Might amuse me at best...
Saying you need a masters or equivalent is a ridiculous elitist position to hold for somebody that probably harps about inequality.
Damn right. I don't want people who aren't smart running things. Those men are FLUKES, they are not the norm.
Intelligence ≠ getting degrees
I'm hoping you meant 'Third Way' instead of 'Third Position'. Third Position is another term for fascism. If not then there isn't much use arguing with you, all I got to say is follow your leader.
You're right. Third Way.. I don't fit comfortably on the left/right paradigm. But I'm not a Fascist.. they are just Corporatist with fancy clothes.. I don't really like labels.. the closest I'd get to an American Political Party that I identify with is Theodore Roosevelt's 1912 Bull Moose party.
Last edited by rabbittss on 08 Feb 2012, 9:54 pm, edited 2 times in total.
That would give credence to the hypothesis that conservatives are delusional
They don't work for everyone but nothing really does work 100%.
Too many variables....
It works for companies, not for the people... leading to Third World conditions.
_________________
A shot gun blast into the face of deceit
You'll gain your just reward.
We'll not rest until the purge is complete
You will reap what you've sown.
Constitutional review is something every country should go through every few decades at least. The US has on occasion tried to play as if its the newest, best thing around, but the proof is in the age of the document and the waning interest in people utilizing it as a framework. Unfortunately I think many Americans are too proud of the original nature of the constitution and have failed to see how it has aged compared to later documents. Documents can say a lot of things though but their application in practice is what matters. Plenty of countries probably have "better" constitutions than America but whether they actually work out this way is the question (the USSR constitution seems very admirable for example with many grandiose guarantees... that may or may not have been kept). I think the US should be more open to constitutional review as it is probably one of the few Western countries who are so against it
_________________
Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do
That would give credence to the hypothesis that conservatives are delusional
They don't work for everyone but nothing really does work 100%.
Too many variables....
It works for companies, not for the people... leading to Third World conditions.
I'm employed by a company.
The company pays me.
I spend the money......
That would give credence to the hypothesis that conservatives are delusional
They don't work for everyone but nothing really does work 100%.
Too many variables....
It works for companies, not for the people... leading to Third World conditions.
I'm employed by a company.
The company pays me.
I spend the money......
Yup. The issue is in human nature.
The majority of the companies will not make use of the extra money to hire more people unless they have some urgent requirement for them (cutting taxes can end a recession for example, or save a company from going bankrupt). Most of the time, the few people at the top get a bigger salary and you get nothing more... except higher taxes to make up for the money the corporations are no longer providing. Trickle down economics don't trickle down, they make the rich richer without making the poor and middle class (which is shrinking by the way) any better off. This makes them a failure as a long term idea, or even a broad idea.
_________________
A shot gun blast into the face of deceit
You'll gain your just reward.
We'll not rest until the purge is complete
You will reap what you've sown.
