donnie_darko wrote:
Actually Grimm, if free speech was ever not applicable to 9/11, it would be 9/11 truth that was criminalised, not believing the official account of events.
Even with the mother's testimony I find the whole thing kind of strange. I do think the phone calls were real, but that in itself doesn't prove 9/11 wasn't partially done from the inside.
First sentence: that is what I meant. I would move so I could get at you. That does not even make sense when I think about what I said, that was rage there.
Second sentence: Sounds great you don't think that. You got some more work to do.
Truther Movement. Dead. 2007. Nothing accomplished. Your questions have been examined, and the answers have been given.
_________________
"You just like to go around rebuking people with your ravenous wolf face and snarling commentary." - Ragtime