31 May 2012, 2:30 pm
12 Jun 2012, 7:39 pm
12 Jun 2012, 7:49 pm
14 Jun 2012, 10:15 am
14 Jun 2012, 11:45 am
14 Jun 2012, 5:48 pm
If I could vote...I'll probably vote for some one who is against Obama...That person happens to be Romney 
Which one is the lesser of teh two evils???
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
14 Jun 2012, 5:56 pm
NorthPark wrote:
If I could vote...I'll probably vote for some one who is against Obama...That person happens to be Romney
Which one is the lesser of teh two evils???
Which one is the lesser of teh two evils???
Considering Romney's callous disregard for the welfare of ordinary Americans when he headed up Bain, I'd say he fills the slot of greater evil.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
14 Jun 2012, 7:46 pm
Kraichgauer wrote:
NorthPark wrote:
If I could vote...I'll probably vote for some one who is against Obama...That person happens to be Romney
Which one is the lesser of teh two evils???
Which one is the lesser of teh two evils???
Considering Romney's callous disregard for the welfare of ordinary Americans when he headed up Bain, I'd say he fills the slot of greater evil.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Depends on how you define "ordinary American"............
14 Jun 2012, 8:58 pm
Raptor wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
NorthPark wrote:
If I could vote...I'll probably vote for some one who is against Obama...That person happens to be Romney
Which one is the lesser of teh two evils???
Which one is the lesser of teh two evils???
Considering Romney's callous disregard for the welfare of ordinary Americans when he headed up Bain, I'd say he fills the slot of greater evil.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Depends on how you define "ordinary American"............
I think he means the growing lower class of Americans that have seen 40% of their wealthy vanish, back to levels they made in the 90s.
I don't think it's a good reason to vote for either. They are both Goldman Sachs picks, they both don't have many striking differences. To say one is better than the other is as asinine as choosing s**t over vomit. No one has to vote for either and I won't.
14 Jun 2012, 10:07 pm
snapcap wrote:
Raptor wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
NorthPark wrote:
If I could vote...I'll probably vote for some one who is against Obama...That person happens to be Romney
Which one is the lesser of teh two evils???
Which one is the lesser of teh two evils???
Considering Romney's callous disregard for the welfare of ordinary Americans when he headed up Bain, I'd say he fills the slot of greater evil.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Depends on how you define "ordinary American"............
I think he means the growing lower class of Americans that have seen 40% of their wealthy vanish, back to levels they made in the 90s.
I don't think it's a good reason to vote for either. They are both Goldman Sachs picks, they both don't have many striking differences. To say one is better than the other is as asinine as choosing sh** over vomit. No one has to vote for either and I won't.
Quote:
I think he means the growing lower class of Americans that have seen 40% of their wealthy vanish, back to levels they made in the 90s.
And since that hasn't improved with Barack in office I doubt they'll be in the mood for four more years of him.
Even if it's not his fault people are still hurting and are likely to show their anger at the polls. We'll have to wait until November to see for sure, though...........
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
14 Jun 2012, 10:41 pm
Raptor wrote:
snapcap wrote:
Raptor wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
NorthPark wrote:
If I could vote...I'll probably vote for some one who is against Obama...That person happens to be Romney
Which one is the lesser of teh two evils???
Which one is the lesser of teh two evils???
Considering Romney's callous disregard for the welfare of ordinary Americans when he headed up Bain, I'd say he fills the slot of greater evil.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Depends on how you define "ordinary American"............
I think he means the growing lower class of Americans that have seen 40% of their wealthy vanish, back to levels they made in the 90s.
I don't think it's a good reason to vote for either. They are both Goldman Sachs picks, they both don't have many striking differences. To say one is better than the other is as asinine as choosing sh** over vomit. No one has to vote for either and I won't.
Quote:
I think he means the growing lower class of Americans that have seen 40% of their wealthy vanish, back to levels they made in the 90s.
And since that hasn't improved with Barack in office I doubt they'll be in the mood for four more years of him.
Even if it's not his fault people are still hurting and are likely to show their anger at the polls. We'll have to wait until November to see for sure, though...........
In fact, things had gotten worse for working class people under Bush. With a Romney presidency, there would be even less chance for them to recover what they had once had.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
14 Jun 2012, 11:53 pm
15 Jun 2012, 12:44 am
15 Jun 2012, 5:41 am
NorthPark wrote:
If I could vote...I'll probably vote for some one who is against Obama...That person happens to be Romney
Which one is the lesser of teh two evils???
Which one is the lesser of teh two evils???
I would also vote for anyone but Obama if I could, including Vladimir Putin and Hugo Chavez. But I also don't like Rommney, based on his track record as governor and his support of socialized health care. Is Nader running again this year by chance?
15 Jun 2012, 4:42 pm
15 Jun 2012, 5:23 pm
