Proof of a NWO

Page 3 of 7 [ 104 posts ] Go to page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 Next

Previous topic | Next topic

JanuaryMan
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 1 Jan 2012
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,359

23 Jul 2012, 1:52 pm

nominalist wrote:

ahhhhwhewok wrote:

I understand the purpose of these meetings. The lack of transparency and disclosure to the public, not so much.

IMO, transparency is over-rated. Too much transparency means that people could not feel as free to express their thoughts.

There are various reasons corporations have private meetings:
*Inside trading.
*Not to affect the value of stock and shares for decisions yet to be made / simply discussed that may never be made.
*To prevent fear / panic (as found with scenario preparation).
*Trade secrets.

I don't really agree with any of those but if I was in the shoes of a CEO I would probably not want all my cards laid out on the table, either. It's not good business.

TheKing
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 7 Dec 2010
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,100
Location: Merced, California

23 Jul 2012, 1:54 pm

Awesomelyglorious wrote:

WhiteWidow wrote:

No I can't. It's not that long of a read. You read books don't you?

It's 400 pages. 400 pages is considered an insanely long read for an internet thread.

I definitely read books, and most books are significantly less than 400 pages. Asking for us to read 400 pages for your thread, to find associations without some sense of direction on what particular aspects within that read you consider to prove anything seems a little extreme. Especially given that I think most here do not trust your reasoning and the soundness of it.

Most books i read are 400-700 pages roughly, do you read picture books? Those the only books i can think of that have less than 400 pages

_________________
WP Strident Atheist
If you believe in the Flying Spaghetti Monster, have accepted him as your lord and savior, and are 100% proud of it, put this in your sig.

peebo
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 Mar 2006
Age: 51
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,624
Location: scotland

23 Jul 2012, 1:54 pm

problem is it's not just corporate interests who are in attendance at bilderberg meetings. this is one of the areas where i think people are being quite prudent in having concerns. it's the nature of the concerns that i might perhaps disagree about.

_________________
?Civil government, so far as it is instituted for the security of property, is in reality instituted for the defense of the rich against the poor, or of those who have some property against those who have none at all.?

Adam Smith

Vigilans
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 19 Jun 2008
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,181
Location: Montreal

23 Jul 2012, 1:56 pm

NWO, is that some sort of bamf rap group like NWA?

_________________
Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do

Lord_Gareth
Velociraptor

Joined: 20 Feb 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 440

23 Jul 2012, 1:58 pm

TheKing wrote:

Awesomelyglorious wrote:

WhiteWidow wrote:

No I can't. It's not that long of a read. You read books don't you?

Most books i read are 400-700 pages roughly, do you read picture books? Those the only books i can think of that have less than 400 pages

Reading 400 pages for a random internet thread is waaaaaaaay more free time than I'm willing to spend. If I'm reading 400 pages for something, I'd better be getting either A. an education or B. entertainment value.

_________________
Et in Arcadia ego. - "Even in Arcadia, there am I."

peebo
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 Mar 2006
Age: 51
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,624
Location: scotland

23 Jul 2012, 2:00 pm

TheKing wrote:

Awesomelyglorious wrote:

WhiteWidow wrote:

No I can't. It's not that long of a read. You read books don't you?

Most books i read are 400-700 pages roughly, do you read picture books? Those the only books i can think of that have less than 400 pages

some of the best books ever written have less than 200 pages. camus' the fall has less than 90.

JanuaryMan
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 1 Jan 2012
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,359

23 Jul 2012, 2:00 pm

Vigilans wrote:

NWO, is that some sort of bamf rap group like NWA?

Nigz Within Office? :lol:

peebo. Yes there are geopolitical agendas pushed through such meetings and a lot of lobbying..and that is the "bigger picture" so to speak. What good would stopping those meetings have, though? They will just happen somewhere else. There are other venues such powerful folk meet, anyway.

Vigilans
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 19 Jun 2008
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,181
Location: Montreal

23 Jul 2012, 2:37 pm

JanuaryMan wrote:

Vigilans wrote:

NWO, is that some sort of bamf rap group like NWA?

Nigz Within Office? :lol:

I was thinking Niggaz Wit Optimism but that is good too!

peebo
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 Mar 2006
Age: 51
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,624
Location: scotland

23 Jul 2012, 2:42 pm

JanuaryMan wrote:

of course. doesn't mean i have to approve though. the system is rotten. i won't be satisfied until we've violently overthrown it and eaten the rich.

ahhhhwhewok
Tufted Titmouse

Joined: 21 Feb 2012
Age: 43
Gender: Female
Posts: 27

23 Jul 2012, 3:21 pm

peebo wrote:

JanuaryMan wrote:

of course. doesn't mean i have to approve though. the system is rotten. i won't be satisfied until we've violently overthrown it and eaten the rich.

The fact that political leaders attend is a bit disheartening. I'd almost feel a little better if it was all private corporations.

Not too sure if the rich would taste too good. I absolutely hate caviar.

naturalplastic
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Age: 71
Gender: Male
Posts: 35,189
Location: temperate zone

23 Jul 2012, 3:32 pm

WhiteWidow wrote:

JanuaryMan wrote:

WhiteWidow wrote:

Oodain wrote:

vague superstition.

one of those papers is the outline for the UN humanitarian work, both planned, in progress and what they think is actually needed.
the other is, by its own admission a speculative collection of scenarios.

That humanitarian work is owned by the UN which colaborates with Soros and Sachs. Soros and Sachs profit off of the humanitarian work because of the unecessary tax dollars demanded by the UN (top down) to combat these "problems" which can be easily fixed without government control - merely just by individuals working together. This is a global ponzi scheme, and is outlined in "Commonwealth" by Jeffery Sachs. He states that by 2015 a global fund will be necessary and each state should have control from the top down to appropriately allocate their resources. The UN will control the entire world. It's even stated "The UN will have to take on new authoritarian roles"

This translates to "The UN wants to police the world and they are corrupt!"
Well, no duh! What do you think it was founded for? What are you going to do about it? More importantly, what CAN you do about it?
I guess the answer is "nothing" so you try to "educate" people about it and hope someone else fixes the problem for you. Brilliant. Absolutely brilliant. I'm guessing you bought into the Kony 2012 thing until your info sites tore that a new one as well.

WELL
FOR ONE
I keep touting this one to people - stop consuming so much!
They keep talking about a "demand" in the reports. People are demanding the wrong things. The other day I was volunteering with someone and they said "it would be nice if they built condos here." WHAT?! We have sooooooooo many condos in such a small space here in Edmonton and it's even worse in Toronto. The infastructure is marketed to families as "smaller spaces" and "smarter living" and what do you do? Maybe you don't - but a whole lot of us do - we buy into the lie. We buy the iPad. And the iPhone. I asked someone the other day why they need an iPhone or why they need internet - on their PHONE. They couldn't give me a reason other than "I like having it." Are you seriously telling me we're SO PRESSED FOR TIME that we need to constantly be disconnected from the real world and tuned into a screen? It sure seems that way. A lot of people continue to buy into the lies of consumption. Who really needs 10 pairs of shoes? Or a diamond? The sense of entitlement in North America has destroyed countless lives across the world, and NOW that everything has gone according to plan, the Rockefellers are finally able to implement the next stages, but it's HARD to implement a lot of stages at once, because the rats get crazy. So what do they do? Desensetize us to violence. I bet in 20 - 30 years time they will be executing citizens for breaking the law out in the open.

So its the Rockefellers who behind it all?

Are the Rockellers behind the Illumanatti?

Or is it the Illumanati who are behind the Rockefellers?

Vigilans
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 19 Jun 2008
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,181
Location: Montreal

23 Jul 2012, 3:46 pm

naturalplastic wrote:

So its the Rockefellers who behind it all?

Are the Rockellers behind the Illumanatti?

Or is it the Illumanati who are behind the Rockefellers?

It becomes more clear to me that this conspiracy nonsense is actually a proto-religion. The Rockefeller-Illuminati dichotomy is analogous to the whole "Jesus is God or God's son or both God and his son" thing that Christians go on about

peebo
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 Mar 2006
Age: 51
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,624
Location: scotland

23 Jul 2012, 3:50 pm

ahhhhwhewok wrote:

peebo wrote:

JanuaryMan wrote:

of course. doesn't mean i have to approve though. the system is rotten. i won't be satisfied until we've violently overthrown it and eaten the rich.

forgive me for thinking that if we elect politicians to office as our representatives, then their behaviour should be completely transparent. this is all a moot point, mind, as i have no faith whatsoever in leberal democracy and the point of this exchange between you and i is one example as to why.

not sure i'd literally eat the rich either, that was a reference to this classic comic strip presents film, although i realise it's probably quite obscure

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gk3NKyUfuN0[/youtube]

ahhhhwhewok
Tufted Titmouse

Joined: 21 Feb 2012
Age: 43
Gender: Female
Posts: 27

23 Jul 2012, 3:59 pm

no forgiveness required. opinion is just that and it is yours to have and requires no defense.

ahhhhwhewok
Tufted Titmouse

Joined: 21 Feb 2012
Age: 43
Gender: Female
Posts: 27

23 Jul 2012, 4:04 pm

and thank you for that video. the comedy is a bit awkward, but so much so that i really can't stop watching it.

nominalist
Supporting Member

Joined: 28 Jun 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,740
Location: Lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas (born in NYC)

23 Jul 2012, 4:25 pm

Vigilans wrote:

Yes, as a sociologist of religion, I would call it a far-right libertarian "religious phenomenon." It is not actually a separate religion, since many Christians, Jews, Muslims, atheists, and occultists accept it.

_________________
Mark A. Foster, Ph.D. (retired tenured sociology professor)
36 domains/24 books: http://www.markfoster.net
Emancipated Autism: http://www.neurelitism.com
Institute for Dialectical metaRealism: http://dmr.institute

Page 3 of 7 [ 104 posts ] Go to page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 Next

Jump to:

Proof of a NWO Post Reply New Topic

Proof of a NWO