Men's rights.

Post Reply New Topic

I'm sure some of them look similar to celebrities that you personally find attractive, when said celebrities are not airbrushed and aren't wearing make-up or uncomfortable clothes.

I know a lot of 'attractive' women who don't like men. A lot of strippers don't, actually.

And?

I'm facially quite 'pretty' and I'm a radical feminist (though not as much as Halle Berry, admittedly). There's nothing in radical feminism that means you can't take care of your skin and complexion.

http://www.avoiceformen.com/

Take a look if you want and i suggest anybody that does to look at all the details and think for yourself.

I am pretty sure someone will call this misogyny/misogynist, IT IS NOT!

The leader of Ottar looks like this:

All I see is futile resentment, frustration, and cynicism - a big emotional display. I was expecting to see a list of rights demanded, problems identified and solutions put across - that would be useful. Instead it's just a whole lot of emotional hysteria and visceral nonsense. It reads like a temper tantrum. So it's utterly useless, or worse.

In other words they're the male counterpiece to militant feminists—and like militant feminists, they don't give a damn about equality.

What I'd prefer to see is feminism and the men's right movement go extinct in the face of an equality movement that spans everything, gender, class, race, everything. One that has a reasonable and moderate plan and vision of the future, and isn't taking any sides, just keeping its eye on the ball.

All I see is futile resentment, frustration, and cynicism - a big emotional display. I was expecting to see a list of rights demanded, problems identified and solutions put across - that would be useful. Instead it's just a whole lot of emotional hysteria and visceral nonsense. It reads like a temper tantrum. So it's utterly useless, or worse.

What I'd prefer to see is feminism and the men's right movement go extinct in the face of an equality movement that spans everything, gender, class, race, everything. One that has a reasonable and moderate plan and vision of the future, and isn't taking any sides, just keeping its eye on the ball.

that (bolded) does not equal nearly identical rates of rape or sexual assault for men and women, period. that is what the first article misrepresented and subsequent articles requoted. also, that study was only concerned with various types of assault and abuse between long term partners, not for men and women overall. the MRA article did not make any distinction whatsoever about that.

here are some actual facts from the original study. the penetration numbers you quoted do not exist on in these summaries, so i don't know where you got that from.



it's worthy of noting that women are over 10 times more likely to be raped by a partner in their lifetime than a man is, which is so very different from what the article is claiming. the original article's misrepresentation is pretty blatant and makes me distrustful of the site, because they are trying to changing public policy by manufacturing facts.

one article is even tagged "lying feminist scumbags" yet this article is also lying. that isn't just bad journalism, it's a rallying cry based on a deliberate misrepresentation.

what is interesting is that the same misrepresentstion is quoted over and over again in blogs and in comments on feminist articles and youtube videos, yet not one of those people bothered to do any fact-checking. you would think that ONE of them would have flagged that original article's misleading information. but apparently not.

i agree that there are some areas that need an improvement in equality between men and women (though we may disagree about which specific areas), but the MRA movement isn't helping that cause.