Abortion: What is the measure of a human?

Post Reply New Topic

If you kick a pregnant woman in the stomach and the baby dies, you get charged with murder in basically every state in America. Not even manslaughter, murder. How come said pregnant woman is allowed to kill said baby in her stomach if she feels like it, though? So legally, yes, unborn fetuses are life.

It's infanticide. I think the whole argument framing of "lol is it life" is so bunk and ridiculous. Yes, because there's a high chance such a thing will develop into a full blown human being if allowed on it's natural course of development. If someone cuts down your garden plants, you'd be pissed, even if they're not full grown. Every one of us here talking about this started out as said single celled embryo.

This is why I think framing the arguments for and against abortion in the manner of "is it life or not?" is bunk. It's plain and simple infanticide. Historically, infanticide was done pretty often, and it was common, especially in pre-Christian times. All talking about "does life begin at conception" or not just white washes the infanticide that abortion is and gets our minds off it.

Logically, the only real arguments you can have for or against abortion are whether or not killing said future human is justified due to weakness (ie, handicaps, disabilities) that will prevent it's adaptation to the environment. Or whether or not the environment he/she will be born into is bad and the chance of adaptation into anything good is slim (bad parents, not enough money, bad neighborhood/country.) Or, whether or not it was convenient for the parents to bring said life in the world. Hey, bury the daughters. We want a son, right? I mean my uncle's family on my dad's side aborted their second child because they couldn't keep their standard of living with a second child. Hey, kill your kid if you can't have yachts and Audis, right?

except that on the long term, the fetus or parasite will grow up and quit sucking blood and pay back "with rents". That is what the old people learned from their elders and still today in religios circles.

Id have to say I think the bundle of cells might belong to the human species from the start, but it's not a human being until is lives outside the mother without medical aid.

Until it is possible to put the parasite/fetus in a can and have it develop into an infant outside my body, I don't understand why anyone but I would have a say in decideing what I do or do not do with the lifeform invading my body.

FWIW, there is no reason for anyone to have bio-kids, until all children in this world get what they have a right to;
love, care and attention
Adequat and healthy food
Clean water
healthcare
safety
security
education

There are many levels of consciousness.

The most basic of these is self-awareness. If you are not aware of your own existence, then you do not have the ability to value it and its continuation. Therefore self-awareness, at the very least, is necessary in order to commit a crime against a person.

I am against killing anything that is self-aware, but some people set the bar higher or lower. For example, some people will willingly kill or be party to the killing of a pig, which is a great deal more intelligent than merely self-aware, but some people object to the killing of anything that is alive, if at all avoidable. In fact, I do actually set the bar lower than mere self-awareness and am against the killing of worms, snails and insects (except to preserve more valuable life, such as hedgehogs).

I have no problem with the position that "abortion is wrong because all life is sacred". I object to the bigoted opinion that "abortion is wrong because human life is sacred".

Yes, all life is intrinsically valuable. As in, all life has a value greater than zero. But that doesn't mean that all life is equally valuable. You can't deal with the real world if you assign a value of infinity to every life form. I mean, right now, your blood cells are killing bacteria inside your body. How horrifying!