Proof that conservatives are the dangerous and unhinged...

Page 3 of 9 [ 131 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 9  Next

Dox47
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,670
Location: Seattle-ish

16 Nov 2012, 4:00 pm

This thread "proves" two things:

One particular women is dangerously unhinged.

The OP has decidedly to openly join the partisan shit-stirrers, or at the very least forgotten what the word "proof" means.


_________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.

- Rick Sanchez


MarketAndChurch
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Apr 2011
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,022
Location: The Peoples Republic Of Portland

16 Nov 2012, 4:36 pm

marshall wrote:
MarketAndChurch wrote:
ScrewyWabbit wrote:
MarketAndChurch wrote:
So we don't criticize the president lest a fundamentalist takes it too far?

I don't understand what your saying. What "rhetoric" do you wish toned down?



People should criticize the president all they want - Obama or anyone else who holds the office. Almost no one should think any president 100% perfect, and voicing our criticisms is a healthy thing in a free society.

However, there are criticisms that are based in reality, and then there are made up conspiracy theories that have nothing to do with anything except trying to stir up hatred. Things like Obama (is a / wants to) muslim, take guns, socialist, kenyan, shaira law advocate, etc etc. etc. where there's absolutely no evidence for any of it.


what % of the GOP claims any of those things or cares for them?

Obama does want to take our guns, just because he hasn't gotten around to half of the things he'd like to get to does not mean he has no intention on limiting firearm ownership, and certainly raising tighter enforcement of current laws to achieve that.

Were any of the criticisms of Bush as Hitler part II taken in the same light? No, we understood it for what it was: a degrading insult. I don't agree when either side engages in it, but we are always viewed as having malicious intent, while those making the charge excuse their side of it.


The thing is the Glenn Beck crap and conservative fear in general is so insane it doesn't make any sense at all. Liberals protest an unpopular war with comparisons to fascism. Right wing nut-jobs protest government healthcare as either "fascist" or "communist". Okay, that must mean every other developed country in the world is "fascist" or "communist" because they aren't backwards enough to be like the US and deny critical healthcare to those who can't afford it.

Also, the nut-job fear is not simply about being against restrictions on firearms. It's the belief that restricting firearms is a hidden agenda to make it easier for the federal government to come in and march all the unarmed conservatives off to UN re-education camps. Sorry, but there is no equivalent on the left end of the spectrum to the completely stupid, irrational, and idiotic bat-sh** insanity of the far right. Sorry if it hurts your feelings but there just isn't an equivalent. You'd have to go to China and find some dangerous screw-ball Maoists to match the level of stupid irrational insanity in the American far right. American conservatism is severe aberration to everyone else in the world.



Healthcare
Right wingers associate government health care with socialist collectivist religions because you are nationalizing, or in the process of, an entire industry. Those who can't afford it are well below 15% of the populace. Of those who don't have insurance, they are young and don't care for it. The remainder don't have it because their employer won't provide it to them, but that's an even smaller %. So you are going to go the way of Europe, a system that does not work, for the sake of such a tiny fraction of the population? Instead of fighting costs that have gone up so that the entry into the healthcare market will be affordable to even them, and for the rest of us who already have it? But results don't matter to the Left. Intending to do good does, and it may do good for a generation or two, but if you are not reproducing at replacement rate to keep an expensive system going, what kind of unsustainable system is that? And who are you to saddle future generations with debt from an unsustainable system? Do you think the Japanese in 2025 will be so thrilled about their health care system when all of the weight of the system will be the burden of fewer and fewer young japanese citizens?

The Right
What % of the right do you think believes that the government is going to take away our guns and march us to UN re-education camps? Please put a number down or else this is a pointless straw man. There is fear of the UN on the right and justifiably so. The US education system is a re-education camp, especially College which is just a left-wing seminary. But even in the K-12, especially in California where History has been reshaped to make certain groups feel better about themselves, and social issues such as womens rights and the environment are given greater importance, and the conscience is blunted, and moral reasoning reshaped to fit with left wing values of Tolerance, Multiculturalism, Equality, Secularism, Environmentalism, Compassion, and Collectivism. They are, in their view, correctly teaching you how to view reality, through the prism of Race, Gender, and Class.

The Left
The Left charges the US as being a fascistic imperialist puppet state, bidding for their corporatist masters, out to rape the planet and enslave the human race. This isn't some fringe element of the Left who believes this, this is half of the left in the United States, every single leftist in Academia, and the over-whelming majority of the Left world wide. Every leftwing best seller posits it in their books. From Chomsky to Lapham to Lakoff to Zinn. It inspires every Left wing revolution, and they never question the validity of those charges. Its just assumed, and massive lies are then built on that faulty assumption. I'm sorry, but to draw out what some fringe right wingers might believe as paradigmatic of a portion of the Right and not acknowledge that this type of thinking pervades pretty much all of the Left, everywhere in the WORLD needs some rethinking.


_________________
It is not up to you to finish the task, nor are you free to desist from trying.


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

16 Nov 2012, 4:36 pm

Dox47 wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Since when does Obama want to take your guns? That is, outside of Rush Limbaugh's and Glenn Beck's fevered imaginations.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


He was quite the gun control supporter before he became a serious presidential contender, even voting for unconstitutional complete handgun bans during his stint in Illinois. Given his now well known ability to change his spots to whatever is most politically advantageous at the time, perhaps he really doesn't care one way or the other and simply adopts the position that will get him the most votes where he's currently running, but the idea that he's severely anti gun didn't come from nowhere, but is based on his personal statements and voting record.

Personally, I'm not worried, as second term president or not he still has to worry about the rest of his party, and America as a whole still doesn't care for gun control. I think he's a lot of things, many of them uncomplimentary, but stupid isn't one of them.


Gun control and making guns illegal are hardly the same thing.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer



Tequila
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 28,897
Location: Lancashire, UK

16 Nov 2012, 4:45 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
Gun control and making guns illegal are hardly the same thing.


Tell that to people in Britain. The gun control people would make guns completely illegal if they could, but that would cause more problems than it would solve and would make things a lot more difficult for farmers. Most types of guns are banned here anyway, including a complete ban on handguns (after Dunblane, although an exception must be made for NI) and even shotgun licences aren't totally thrown around everywhere. Northern Ireland is an exception, where a lot of people - mainly ex- coppers - have pistols as personal protection weapons. Guns are widely available for the use of criminal gangs here in Britain, but law-abiding people can't have them, or indeed any weapon for personal protection. Our police (apart from in Central London, for special events, at airports and in Northern Ireland) aren't armed.

I favour a gradual relaxation of gun control laws here (some of our restrictions are insane, like the Olympic pistol shooting team having to go abroad to train), although not to the state of the U.S. or Switzerland unless crime levels fall as a result.



marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

16 Nov 2012, 6:10 pm

MarketAndChurch wrote:
Healthcare
Right wingers associate government health care with socialist collectivist religions because you are nationalizing, or in the process of, an entire industry. Those who can't afford it are well below 15% of the populace. Of those who don't have insurance, they are young and don't care for it. The remainder don't have it because their employer won't provide it to them, but that's an even smaller %. So you are going to go the way of Europe, a system that does not work, for the sake of such a tiny fraction of the population? Instead of fighting costs that have gone up so that the entry into the healthcare market will be affordable to even them, and for the rest of us who already have it? But results don't matter to the Left. Intending to do good does, and it may do good for a generation or two, but if you are not reproducing at replacement rate to keep an expensive system going, what kind of unsustainable system is that? And who are you to saddle future generations with debt from an unsustainable system? Do you think the Japanese in 2025 will be so thrilled about their health care system when all of the weight of the system will be the burden of fewer and fewer young japanese citizens?

Hong Kong and Singapore have affordable healthcare for everyone. These are bastions of free-market capitalism. Also, there are tons of countries in the world with one form or another of universal healthcare. They are not all "going bankrupt". The claim that universal healthcare is unsustainable just doesn't hold water.

You can criticize Obama's ACA bill all you want. I'd even join you. The problem I have is the Republicans don't offer an alternative that provides affordable coverage to everyone. The only things they're willing to address are tort reform and ways to deal with preexisting conditions. Other than that they are comfortable with the status quo which is also unsustainable IMO.

BTW. Here's a libertarian arguing for universal coverage...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/nathan-lewis/does-hong-kong-have-the-w_b_299907.html

Quote:
The Right
What % of the right do you think believes that the government is going to take away our guns and march us to UN re-education camps? Please put a number down or else this is a pointless straw man. There is fear of the UN on the right and justifiably so. The US education system is a re-education camp, especially College which is just a left-wing seminary. But even in the K-12, especially in California where History has been reshaped to make certain groups feel better about themselves, and social issues such as womens rights and the environment are given greater importance, and the conscience is blunted, and moral reasoning reshaped to fit with left wing values of Tolerance, Multiculturalism, Equality, Secularism, Environmentalism, Compassion, and Collectivism. They are, in their view, correctly teaching you how to view reality, through the prism of Race, Gender, and Class.

The Left
The Left charges the US as being a fascistic imperialist puppet state, bidding for their corporatist masters, out to rape the planet and enslave the human race. This isn't some fringe element of the Left who believes this, this is half of the left in the United States, every single leftist in Academia, and the over-whelming majority of the Left world wide. Every leftwing best seller posits it in their books. From Chomsky to Lapham to Lakoff to Zinn. It inspires every Left wing revolution, and they never question the validity of those charges. Its just assumed, and massive lies are then built on that faulty assumption. I'm sorry, but to draw out what some fringe right wingers might believe as paradigmatic of a portion of the Right and not acknowledge that this type of thinking pervades pretty much all of the Left, everywhere in the WORLD needs some rethinking.

It's not a straw man to say the right is currently more of a hardline ideology than the left in the US. The left may dominate academia but they hardly have actual political power or will these days. The more radical left you talk of does not endorse the Democratic party. Unlike the radical right, the radical left don't have a platform with any real power. Why? The radical left can't get corporate money because they'd be a threat to the moneyed interests. The Democratic party walks the center line because they can't get too radical or they'd be biting that corporate hand that feeds them.



marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

16 Nov 2012, 6:25 pm

Dox47 wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
And you know something? Despite being a right wing zealot, old man Koch had still built a nuclear plant for Joseph Stalin. I guess his political ideology went out the window when dollar signs came up.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


From what I understand, it was the experience of working in the communist USSR and seeing the results of said communism up close and personal that turned Koch Sr. into the right wing activist he became, to prevent the spread of such a destructive ideology to the US.


Karl Marx saw the exploitative and destructive nature of 19th century Dickensian liassez-faire capitalism up close and personal.



androbot2084
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Mar 2011
Age: 65
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,447

16 Nov 2012, 6:35 pm

Ancient Israel had socialized medicine but the religious right refuses to recognize that fact.



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

16 Nov 2012, 6:39 pm

Tequila wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Gun control and making guns illegal are hardly the same thing.


Tell that to people in Britain. The gun control people would make guns completely illegal if they could, but that would cause more problems than it would solve and would make things a lot more difficult for farmers. Most types of guns are banned here anyway, including a complete ban on handguns (after Dunblane, although an exception must be made for NI) and even shotgun licences aren't totally thrown around everywhere. Northern Ireland is an exception, where a lot of people - mainly ex- coppers - have pistols as personal protection weapons. Guns are widely available for the use of criminal gangs here in Britain, but law-abiding people can't have them, or indeed any weapon for personal protection. Our police (apart from in Central London, for special events, at airports and in Northern Ireland) aren't armed.

I favour a gradual relaxation of gun control laws here (some of our restrictions are insane, like the Olympic pistol shooting team having to go abroad to train), although not to the state of the U.S. or Switzerland unless crime levels fall as a result.


That's England. No one in America - even on the hard left - advocates taking guns out of the hands of responsible people. Even the late Hunter S. Thompson, who was a left wing wild man, was a gun enthusiast, and would never have advocated such a thing. The Ragin' Cajun, James Carvel - who had put Bill Clinton in the White House - is an enthusiastic gun owner who would never back seizing guns from the public. Gun control entails keeping firearms out of the hands of criminals, mentally ill people, and hopefully out of the hands of people with extreme political and religious viewpoints, that entails hurting the evil unbelievers to usher in a new golden age.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

16 Nov 2012, 6:42 pm

androbot2084 wrote:
Ancient Israel had socialized medicine but the religious right refuses to recognize that fact.


There's a whole lot about the Bible that the religious right refuses to recognize.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

16 Nov 2012, 6:48 pm

Dox47 wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
And you know something? Despite being a right wing zealot, old man Koch had still built a nuclear plant for Joseph Stalin. I guess his political ideology went out the window when dollar signs came up.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


From what I understand, it was the experience of working in the communist USSR and seeing the results of said communism up close and personal that turned Koch Sr. into the right wing activist he became, to prevent the spread of such a destructive ideology to the US.


As the John Birch Society also had opposed civil rights for blacks, opposed workers rights, and promoted the crackpot idiocy that Judaism was behind communism, it's clear old man Koch saw what the rest of us see as genuine liberty and social justice as communistic. For God's sake, the Birchers had even monitored The Twilight Zone, thinking something that weird must somehow be communistic. Really, I'm not making this up!

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer



androbot2084
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Mar 2011
Age: 65
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,447

16 Nov 2012, 6:49 pm

But the religious right calls themselves fundamentalists which means that they take the Bible literally. The reason why the fundies get away with it is because in modern times there is a separation between Church and medicine with the exception of miracle healings. In ancient days the Priests were the Doctors who accepted tithes which is a 10 percent tax rather than flat fees .



techstepgenr8tion
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2005
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 24,682
Location: 28th Path of Tzaddi

16 Nov 2012, 7:07 pm

I think she just wanted to run over her husband for her own reasons. Saying it was over him not voting just got her enough media coverage to help fund attorneys.



noxnocturne
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Nov 2012
Age: 47
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,693
Location: Harassing Muggles

16 Nov 2012, 7:26 pm

marshall wrote:
http://www.12newsnow.com/story/20088243/az-woman-runs-over-husband-for-not-voting

Also, with all the rabid secession talk I'm not holding my breath that some bastard will try to assassinate the President or start a bloody civil war. I hope conservatives are happy being useful idiot goons for the rich. They are the Frankenstein monster manufactured by the Koch Brothers and Rupert Murdock's cancerous meme machine.


I myself am a conservative, and frankly I don't really appreciate being called an "idiot goon".



techstepgenr8tion
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2005
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 24,682
Location: 28th Path of Tzaddi

16 Nov 2012, 7:30 pm

noxnocturne wrote:
marshall wrote:
http://www.12newsnow.com/story/20088243/az-woman-runs-over-husband-for-not-voting

Also, with all the rabid secession talk I'm not holding my breath that some bastard will try to assassinate the President or start a bloody civil war. I hope conservatives are happy being useful idiot goons for the rich. They are the Frankenstein monster manufactured by the Koch Brothers and Rupert Murdock's cancerous meme machine.


I myself am a conservative, and frankly I don't really appreciate being called an "idiot goon".

Well, that's because you haven't subscribed to the National Association of Jack-Booted Thugs yet (or at least her American sister organization). I'll gladly give you a hug and a "Zeig Heil!" my compatriot :P.



Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

16 Nov 2012, 9:33 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:

Quote:
Gun control entails keeping firearms out of the hands of criminals, mentally ill people, and hopefully out of the hands of people with extreme political and religious viewpoints, that entails hurting the evil unbelievers to usher in a new golden age.


So now political allegiance is criteria for who is permitted to own firearms?
And, no, gun control has nothing to do with keeping firearms out of the hands of criminals.
We’ve been round and round on this before.
And WTF is this "golden age"?


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

16 Nov 2012, 9:34 pm

noxnocturne wrote:
marshall wrote:
http://www.12newsnow.com/story/20088243/az-woman-runs-over-husband-for-not-voting

Also, with all the rabid secession talk I'm not holding my breath that some bastard will try to assassinate the President or start a bloody civil war. I hope conservatives are happy being useful idiot goons for the rich. They are the Frankenstein monster manufactured by the Koch Brothers and Rupert Murdock's cancerous meme machine.


I myself am a conservative, and frankly I don't really appreciate being called an "idiot goon".


Considering the source you should accept it as a compliment.


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson