Page 3 of 7 [ 111 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

Ann2011
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Jul 2011
Age: 55
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,843
Location: Ontario, Canada

19 Mar 2013, 2:26 pm

Sylkat wrote:
Cody Saltsman's parents started a lawsuit claiming slander against the blogger who exposed this possibly being a set-up, instigated by him.

Days later, the suit was dropped.

So they had malicious intent from the start. Nasty. I wonder how often this happens and there isn't all the media evidence.



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,951
Location:      

19 Mar 2013, 2:28 pm

Blaming the victim for rape condones the rape and excuses the rapists.

Blaming the victim of a beating condones the beating and excuses the bullies.

Blaming the victim of theft condones the theft and excuses the thieves.

It all comes down to who actually committed the crime - THAT person should be blamed.



GGPViper
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,880

19 Mar 2013, 3:33 pm

Fnord wrote:
Blaming the victim for rape condones the rape and excuses the rapists.

Blaming the victim of a beating condones the beating and excuses the bullies.

Blaming the victim of theft condones the theft and excuses the thieves.

It all comes down to who actually committed the crime - THAT person should be blamed.

So who would you blame if Trent Mays and Ma'lik Richmond get raped in prison?

Checkmate?



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,951
Location:      

19 Mar 2013, 3:46 pm

GGPViper wrote:
Fnord wrote:
Blaming the victim for rape condones the rape and excuses the rapists. Blaming the victim of a beating condones the beating and excuses the bullies. Blaming the victim of theft condones the theft and excuses the thieves. It all comes down to who actually committed the crime - THAT person should be blamed.
So who would you blame if Trent Mays and Ma'lik Richmond get raped in prison?

The rapists, of course.

Not the judge, not the prosecutor, not the victim or her lawyers, but the people who actually commit the crimes.



Dox47
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,670
Location: Seattle-ish

19 Mar 2013, 4:04 pm

Fnord wrote:
Not the judge, not the prosecutor, not the victim or her lawyers, but the people who actually commit the crimes.


How about the jailers who let it happen? Or the system that knowingly places people into an environment where rape and assault are likely?


_________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.

- Rick Sanchez


Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,951
Location:      

19 Mar 2013, 4:25 pm

Dox47 wrote:
Fnord wrote:
Not the judge, not the prosecutor, not the victim or her lawyers, but the people who actually commit the crimes.
How about the jailers who let it happen? Or the system that knowingly places people into an environment where rape and assault are likely?

No.

The deciding factor is not the likelihood of an attack, but whether or not an attack actually takes place, and the only person who has any real control over that is the attacker. Since the attackers chose to attack their victim, the attackers are at fault.

Do you blame your victims, too?



GGPViper
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,880

19 Mar 2013, 4:33 pm

Fnord wrote:
GGPViper wrote:
Fnord wrote:
Blaming the victim for rape condones the rape and excuses the rapists. Blaming the victim of a beating condones the beating and excuses the bullies. Blaming the victim of theft condones the theft and excuses the thieves. It all comes down to who actually committed the crime - THAT person should be blamed.
So who would you blame if Trent Mays and Ma'lik Richmond get raped in prison?

The rapists, of course.

Not the judge, not the prosecutor, not the victim or her lawyers, but the people who actually commit the crimes.

Funny. Previously, on "Verdict in Steubenville Case":

Fnord wrote:
Ann2011 wrote:
... It's ironic that the convicts will probably be subject to the same assault that was judged so heinous.

Let the punishment fit the crime.

Oh, and this...

Fnord wrote:
Blaming the victim for rape condones the rape and excuses the rapists.

Problem?



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,951
Location:      

19 Mar 2013, 4:43 pm

GGPViper wrote:
Fnord wrote:
GGPViper wrote:
Fnord wrote:
Blaming the victim for rape condones the rape and excuses the rapists. Blaming the victim of a beating condones the beating and excuses the bullies. Blaming the victim of theft condones the theft and excuses the thieves. It all comes down to who actually committed the crime - THAT person should be blamed.
So who would you blame if Trent Mays and Ma'lik Richmond get raped in prison?
The rapists, of course. Not the judge, not the prosecutor, not the victim or her lawyers, but the people who actually commit the crimes.
Funny. Previously, on "Verdict in Steubenville Case":
Fnord wrote:
Ann2011 wrote:
... It's ironic that the convicts will probably be subject to the same assault that was judged so heinous.
Let the punishment fit the crime.
Oh, and this...
Fnord wrote:
Blaming the victim for rape condones the rape and excuses the rapists.
Problem?

No problem at all. I believe that punishments should fit crimes. Mays and Richmond are not victims ... yet. But again, if no crime is committed against them, then they will not be victims, and there will be no attackers to be punished accordingly.



GGPViper
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,880

19 Mar 2013, 5:00 pm

Fnord wrote:
GGPViper wrote:
Fnord wrote:
GGPViper wrote:
Fnord wrote:
Blaming the victim for rape condones the rape and excuses the rapists. Blaming the victim of a beating condones the beating and excuses the bullies. Blaming the victim of theft condones the theft and excuses the thieves. It all comes down to who actually committed the crime - THAT person should be blamed.
So who would you blame if Trent Mays and Ma'lik Richmond get raped in prison?
The rapists, of course. Not the judge, not the prosecutor, not the victim or her lawyers, but the people who actually commit the crimes.
Funny. Previously, on "Verdict in Steubenville Case":
Fnord wrote:
Ann2011 wrote:
... It's ironic that the convicts will probably be subject to the same assault that was judged so heinous.
Let the punishment fit the crime.
Oh, and this...
Fnord wrote:
Blaming the victim for rape condones the rape and excuses the rapists.
Problem?

No problem at all. I believe that punishments should fit crimes. Mays and Richmond are not victims ... yet. But again, if no crime is committed against them, then they will not be victims, and there will be no attackers to be punished accordingly.

BS to the 157th degree.

I guess your no-nonsense attitude doesn't apply when you are the one on the receiving end.

The only remotely sane interpretation of your "Let the punishment fit the crime" statement (and I even called you out on it to make sure that you really meant it. Remember?) is that you condone the rape of individuals convicted of rape. Don't insult my intellect by claiming otherwise.

Which makes your "Blaming the victim for rape condones the rape and excuses the rapists" a candidate for the most hypocritical statement on WP this year. And it's only March.



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,951
Location:      

19 Mar 2013, 5:25 pm

GGPViper wrote:
BS to the 157th degree.

To you, perhaps; not to others.

GGPViper wrote:
I guess your no-nonsense attitude doesn't apply when you are the one on the receiving end.

I've been a victim. That's how I earned my no-nonsense attitude. I've also sought revenge. That's how I know it works.

GGPViper wrote:
The only remotely sane interpretation of your "Let the punishment fit the crime" statement (and I even called you out on it to make sure that you really meant it. Remember?) is that you condone the rape of individuals convicted of rape. Don't insult my intellect by claiming otherwise.

I never intended to claim otherwise. I believe that every convicted criminal should somehow be punished in the same way that they assaulted their victims - murderers should be shot, stabbed, poisoned, bludgeoned, choked, or electrocuted, according to how they murdered their victims. Rapists should be violated, as well. Thieves ... well, if they have nothing of value to take away, then we'll just have to settle for stealing a few years of their freedom.

GGPViper wrote:
Which makes your "Blaming the victim for rape condones the rape and excuses the rapists" a candidate for the most hypocritical statement on WP this year. And it's only March.

How so? I won't blame the rapists for getting raped, and I wouldn't excuse their rapists raping them. As for condoning ... being in favor of capital punishment has already made me a hypocrite, hasn't it?

And it's a good thing that there is no law against hypocrisy.



GGPViper
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,880

19 Mar 2013, 5:55 pm

Fnord wrote:
GGPViper wrote:
BS to the 157th degree.

To you, perhaps; not to others.

GGPViper wrote:
I guess your no-nonsense attitude doesn't apply when you are the one on the receiving end.

I've been a victim. That's how I earned my no-nonsense attitude. I've also sought revenge. That's how I know it works.

GGPViper wrote:
The only remotely sane interpretation of your "Let the punishment fit the crime" statement (and I even called you out on it to make sure that you really meant it. Remember?) is that you condone the rape of individuals convicted of rape. Don't insult my intellect by claiming otherwise.

I never intended to claim otherwise. I believe that every convicted criminal should somehow be punished in the same way that they assaulted their victims - murderers should be shot, stabbed, poisoned, bludgeoned, choked, or electrocuted, according to how they murdered their victims. Rapists should be violated, as well. Thieves ... well, if they have nothing of value to take away, then we'll just have to settle for stealing a few years of their freedom.

GGPViper wrote:
Which makes your "Blaming the victim for rape condones the rape and excuses the rapists" a candidate for the most hypocritical statement on WP this year. And it's only March.

How so? I won't blame the rapists for getting raped, and I wouldn't excuse their rapists raping them. As for condoning ... being in favor of capital punishment has already made me a hypocrite, hasn't it?

And it's a good thing that there is no law against hypocrisy.

Well, at least you are honest about being a piece of s**t.

I'd elaborate, but I think Dox47 already made my point in this thread...



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,951
Location:      

19 Mar 2013, 6:06 pm

GGPViper wrote:
Well, at least you are honest about being a piece of sh**...

Such eloquence.

:roll:

However you judge me is irrelevant. Those two rapists have been charged, tried, judged, convicted, and sentenced. Whatever fate awaits them in this world (or the next) is not enough of a concern of mine to keep me awake - they're criminals, plain and simple. Trent Mays, 17, and Ma'lik Richmond, 16, will spend at least a year in a juvenile correctional facility, although authorities could decide to keep them in custody until they turn 21. Both must undergo treatment and will have to register as sex offenders for the rest of their lives. In my opinion, they deserve worse; but I'm not the final authority in their case.

(Maybe they should just be forcibly trans-gendered. :lol: )

For their 16-year-old victim, the next phase of her life isn't so clear. Victims of sexual assault are three times more likely to suffer from depression and six times more likely to suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder. Some try to self-medicate with alcohol or drugs. Many have trouble with intimacy and forming trusting relationships. Some even commit suicide. I hope for her sake that she gets all of the support and rehabilitation she needs, and that she can and will lead a healthy and fulfilling life.

Her only crime was drinking while under age - a stupid act, to be sure, but nothing to mitigate the crimes of her attackers. She was the victim of their violence, and not the cause of it.



GGPViper
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,880

19 Mar 2013, 6:15 pm

Fnord wrote:
GGPViper wrote:
Well, at least you are honest about being a piece of sh**...

Such eloquence. :roll:.

I reserve my civilized vocabulary for civilized people. Offense intended.



BlueMax
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Aug 2007
Age: 52
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,285

19 Mar 2013, 6:22 pm

Don't worry - he's sobbing to the moderators right now. :roll:



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

19 Mar 2013, 6:22 pm

BuyerBeware wrote:
No. It can happen anywhere, but some places are more likely than others. In his world?? A woman does not go out at night. A woman ideally should not go out alone. It eventually becomes understood that a woman must, sometimes, go out "alone," at least in a country that does not practice shari'a.

I have to take the kids to the dentist/doctor during business hours on weekdays-- I go, and I come back. I have to go to the grocery during the day-- I go, I come straight back. I do not a gun-- in Pennsylvania, I'm not allowed to own one as I am considered potentially dangerous (I took myself to the hospital when I could no longer fight suicidal urges). I do not carry pepper spray or any other weapon-- that might be interpreted as aggression.

If you go to a party, make it a respectable party, and go with your spouse/partner/SO. Stay with them unless you are in the bathroom. Lock the door when you go pee, and don't take too long. Not everyone who seems respectable is respectable; no place is actually safe.

We used to go to New Year parties at the home of one of his friend's parents. Stuffy upscale condo community. The room was full of people drinking cheap champagne and making stupid smalltalk-- GPAs and grad school plans and papers they'd written and awards they were nominated for. Politely dressed bragging and self-promotion. At first, I excused myself to the parking lot to smoke when I started getting disgusted and overwhelmed. That was not acceptable-- then he had to leave the party to babysit me. I eventually learned to pour my drink down the bathroom sink so it would appear I had drunk quite a bit, lean into the back of the couch, and pretend to be asleep. I am glad that the friend has moved to California, that the group has broken up, that we have had too many children for such gatherings, and that we don't go to those parties any more.

I used to think he was really well-intentioned, but immature and insecure. I used to cut classes and sneak off to get some time to myself. Then I used to think he was a paranoid, controlling ass. I used to think that people should simply understand that there are some things you don't do to other people, that no one deserves to be hurt.

Now I understand that he was right, and I was naive.

I was a bleeding heart and an idealist. Maybe it should be that way, but it isn't. This world may be a sh** hole, but it's the sh** hole we're in. Accept it, live in it, live with it. The alternative is suicide. Idealism is nice. I wish we lived in a more idealistic world. It would be nice.

Idealism is also a trait of autistic pathology, and a form of delusion.

Sorry, sad but true. I'm sorry this stupid kid got hurt. Sad for her. Not sad that the a**holes that did it are going to jail-- and I hope they get a dose of their own medicine. Not sad that the b*****s who threatened her are going to get in trouble too. I actually hope they catch ever f**** that passed those posts and messages on and charge them all with distributing child porn and obstructing justice.

Doesn't change the fact that she shouldn't have been there, shouldn't have been drinking, shouldn't have been taking risks. If you're going to stick your hands in a fire, don't complain when you get burned.

For the record, I'm teaching my DD11 the same thing. That I will crucify her if I catch her participating in anything like that-- even if I find out that she so much as laughed at a text and then deleted it without sending it on. That if I find out she is participating in bullying, I will make her life a living hell.

And that, if she invites something like that to happen to her, she can expect me to drive her to the doctor, the therapist, the obstetrician or the abortion clinic as she preferrs. I am not my husband-- I will not threaten to disown her, send her away (what my grandparents did when my aunt got raped by a black guy-- you couldn't get an abortion in West Virginia in the 60s), or make her listen to me tear my hair out screaming what shame she's brought on the family (what my grandmother did when I was stupid enough to be open and honest and my stepmom's sister started spreading lies about me).

What she cannot expect, is any measure of sympathy whatsoever. Burn your ass, sit on the blister.


Are your and your family's opinions about rape and rape victims something dictated by the state and region of the country you are originally from? I ask, because I wonder if the disconnect between yourself and us other posters on this subject might not be cultural and regional.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,951
Location:      

19 Mar 2013, 6:36 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
Are your and your family's opinions about rape and rape victims something dictated by the state and region of the country you are originally from? I ask, because I wonder if the disconnect between yourself and us other posters on this subject might not be cultural and regional. -Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer

I might normally expect such reactions from men whose culture is inherently misogynistic, from men who have been abused by women in the past, or from men who have been raised by abusive and misogynistic fathers.

Such hatred and contempt for women I have not seen since being stationed in the Middle East, where women who get raped are executed for the "honor" of their families. Such behavior can not be excused by cultural or regional differences.