03 Apr 2013, 6:24 pm
Nambo wrote:
As I said before, Iam more into Jeff Rense than Alex Jones.
What Jeff Rense offers, is a latest Newsheadlines list from around the world, this does indeed direct a reader to legitimate sources that might have been missed otherwise.
What Jeff Rense offers, is a latest Newsheadlines list from around the world, this does indeed direct a reader to legitimate sources that might have been missed otherwise.
It's not enough to just link to legitimate sources. The sources also need to support what the conspiracy theorist says.
Quote:
A couple of examples, when Gordon Brown was Prime Minister, he attended a G8 summit in India where he said a lot more power and money needs to be given to the UN so they can act as an international Police Force, to stop any country's from resisting the implementation of "The New World Order".
Let's say that this was indeed what was said exactly at the summit, why is that such a malicious thing?
Oh, and be sure to back up whatever answer you come up with evidence and a source that I can refer to for verification (with a clear link and such).
Quote:
Now this wasnt printed in any British media, it was reported in the New Zealand Herald, would have been missed if not for the work of the likes of Jeff Rense to bring this to people's attention.
Ok, what does the newspaper actually say. Let's see a link to the article please.
Quote:
I actually spoke to a Peeress in the House of Lords about this article and even exaggerated it to find out her view when I asked, "what do the House of Lords think about this article I read in the New Zealand Herald where Gordon Brown wants to relinquish British sovereignty for a Global Government, she said, "we think its a good idea", then went on about how there would be no more wars etc.
Not like it would work, but it still doesn't mean the idea is malicious.
Quote:
Another link was to the major Italian newspaper where its current Prime Minister and ex Italian secret service boss announced that all the worlds security services know full well it was Mossad that did 911.
Well, where's the link then? Or are you exaggerating here as well?
Quote:
Another interesting and relevent link is the result of a survey in America, link at that bottom, where you can read such as the following:-
28% of voters believe secretive power elite with a globalist agenda is conspiring to eventually rule the world through an authoritarian world government, or New World Order. A plurality of Romney voters (38%) believe in the New World Order compared to 35% who don’tAMERICAN SURVEYi
28% of voters believe secretive power elite with a globalist agenda is conspiring to eventually rule the world through an authoritarian world government, or New World Order. A plurality of Romney voters (38%) believe in the New World Order compared to 35% who don’tAMERICAN SURVEYi
This proves what exactly?
03 Apr 2013, 7:16 pm
MCalavera wrote:
Nambo wrote:
As I said before, Iam more into Jeff Rense than Alex Jones.
What Jeff Rense offers, is a latest Newsheadlines list from around the world, this does indeed direct a reader to legitimate sources that might have been missed otherwise.
What Jeff Rense offers, is a latest Newsheadlines list from around the world, this does indeed direct a reader to legitimate sources that might have been missed otherwise.
It's not enough to just link to legitimate sources. The sources also need to support what the conspiracy theorist says.
Quote:
A couple of examples, when Gordon Brown was Prime Minister, he attended a G8 summit in India where he said a lot more power and money needs to be given to the UN so they can act as an international Police Force, to stop any country's from resisting the implementation of "The New World Order".
Let's say that this was indeed what was said exactly at the summit, why is that such a malicious thing?
Oh, and be sure to back up whatever answer you come up with evidence and a source that I can refer to for verification (with a clear link and such).
Quote:
Now this wasnt printed in any British media, it was reported in the New Zealand Herald, would have been missed if not for the work of the likes of Jeff Rense to bring this to people's attention.
Ok, what does the newspaper actually say. Let's see a link to the article please.
Quote:
I actually spoke to a Peeress in the House of Lords about this article and even exaggerated it to find out her view when I asked, "what do the House of Lords think about this article I read in the New Zealand Herald where Gordon Brown wants to relinquish British sovereignty for a Global Government, she said, "we think its a good idea", then went on about how there would be no more wars etc.
Not like it would work, but it still doesn't mean the idea is malicious.
Quote:
Another link was to the major Italian newspaper where its current Prime Minister and ex Italian secret service boss announced that all the worlds security services know full well it was Mossad that did 911.
Well, where's the link then? Or are you exaggerating here as well?
Quote:
Another interesting and relevent link is the result of a survey in America, link at that bottom, where you can read such as the following:-
28% of voters believe secretive power elite with a globalist agenda is conspiring to eventually rule the world through an authoritarian world government, or New World Order. A plurality of Romney voters (38%) believe in the New World Order compared to 35% who don’tAMERICAN SURVEYi
28% of voters believe secretive power elite with a globalist agenda is conspiring to eventually rule the world through an authoritarian world government, or New World Order. A plurality of Romney voters (38%) believe in the New World Order compared to 35% who don’tAMERICAN SURVEYi
This proves what exactly?
Well when the conspiracy theorists talk about a plot to have a New World Order, and a British Prime Minister is reported by a mainstream newspaper reporting on a G8 summit to be calling for a New World Order, that is indeed surely the "sources" backing up what the conspiracy theorists say?
As for it being a "malicious thing" or not, that is not the subject of debate on this thread, the subject is conspiracy theory's themselves, this being one of them.
Maybe you could start a new thread to debate this, after speaking to the Peeress and her reasoning on why this was considered to be a good thing, I wished I had asked her, "What happens if somebody called Adolf Hitler or Stalin ends up in charge of this Global Government, who will stop him then?"
Iam afraid the original article reporting on the G8 summit has long gone, heres a related article from the same newspaper entitled Brown's secret talks on 'new world order' click on for full article.
The Italian article :- Ex-Italian Prime Minister - '9/11 Carried Out By CIA and Mossad'
