Does God follow his WORD? Or is it --- do as I say and not a

Page 3 of 3 [ 48 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

naturalplastic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Age: 71
Gender: Male
Posts: 35,189
Location: temperate zone

06 Mar 2015, 9:33 pm

Now that we've gone for three pages on tangents lets go back to the original topic.

The topic is "does God follow his own rules?".

The answer is: of course he doesnt. Of course its 'do as I say, and not as I do' because it would impossible for a deity to function otherwise. A diety, and a human, are different entities so different rules would have to apply if a deity really existed.

Assuming God exists how would a person apply the Ten Commandments to God himself?

Is he supposed follow the stricture "thou shalt not steal"?. He owns everything in Creation so how could he steal the property of others even if he wanted to? Ditto "thou shalt not covet".

Murder? If the Universe had a creator then that creator already pre programmed us all to be mortal- so by definition he is already guilty of being the greatest mass murderer possible- because he murders us all. So you can't postulate a ruling deity who is not a mass murderer.

And so on through the commandments.



slave
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Feb 2012
Age: 113
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,420
Location: Dystopia Planetia

07 Mar 2015, 12:48 am

GnosticBishop wrote:
Does God follow his WORD? Or is it --- do as I say and not as I do?

Romans 12:21 Be not overcome of evil, but overcome evil with good.

Job 2;3 And the LORD said unto Satan: 'Hast thou considered my servant Job, that there is none like him in the earth, a whole-hearted and an upright man, one that feareth God, and shunneth evil? and he still holdeth fast his integrity, although thou didst move Me against him, to destroy him without cause.'

The main and worst time God also replies to evil with evil is when he puts most of us to death in the lake of fire.

From what I have read in scriptures, God does not follow the advice that he gives in his WORD. The above shows him overcome by evil and replying with evil.

Matthew 5:48 Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect.

If we are to emulate God as scriptures say we should, should we too ignore his WORD the way he does?

At the end of days and in many biblical stories of the past, God is overcome by evil and responds with evil while telling us we should respond with good.

Which example should we follow; what God says or what God does?

I think that if God is saying, --- do as I say and not as I do, ---- that that is an immoral example that only a satanic demiurge would say. Yet it appears that that is what God is saying.

Should we follow God, --- or his advice and WORD?

They are not the same. One is good the other evil.

Regards
DL


I respectfully disagree with the assumptions upon which your question is based.

Assumptions:
There is a god.
It communicates in Hebrew.
Its will is knowable.
These writings are this entities telepathic transferred thought.
These writings accurately reflect the thoughts of this entity.
etc.................



GnosticBishop
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Nov 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,686

07 Mar 2015, 8:17 pm

Narrator wrote:
GnosticBishop wrote:
Even you my friend and that is how should be.

Should be? Why?

GnosticBishop wrote:
Narrator wrote:
GnosticBishop wrote:
Religions are to free us but instead most try to enslave us.

Those who want freedom should look to Gnostic Christianity.

Or even freer still, no religion at all.


I hear what you are saying but we all have some ideal that we are slave too.

Yours might be a political system or other philosophy.

I can't see that I'm slave to any ideal. I do have ideals, but I can and do choose to go against them at times, which I couldn't do if I was slave to them.

I do have several conventions I try to follow, if only for a simple life:
- Social conventions, which I inexpertly try to follow (or try to avoid).
- Work conventions, for the sake of income.
- Wife conventions (happy wife, happy life :P )

GnosticBishop wrote:
Thing to try to do is be open to change in accepting whatever is better thinking as it comes to hand.

I see all theologies and philosophies as just a search for the best set of rules to live life by.

Open to change is why, after 35 years being heavily invested in religion, I had to be open to change when I saw its flaws.

Yes, I see religion as fulfillment of rules that some people seem to need.

But I don't agree that philosophies are a search for rules. For me, philosophies are a search for understanding.

GnosticBishop wrote:
Read up on Freud`s Father Complex and you ill see that we all seek the best ideal personified as ourselves.

Even you my friend and that is how should be.

I understand all that. I lost my mother in 2001, then my father in 2002. Aside from missing them and feeling like an orphan, it unlocked me from that need.

Aside from my conventions to keep life simple, my only real ideal is integrity - to act as I believe, and to allow my beliefs to be corrected. It may sound all rather minimalist, but it's very liberating.

I've learned that there is one truth in my life - I will be wrong, and being corrected is affirmation that I'm not stuck in one place. As for other truths, they are all subjective. Look up "truth" in Wikipedia - it demonstrates the wonders still to be explored when released from holding to one set of rules.


Well done.

In my reference to the Father Complex I was thinking more of archetype fathers and not necessarily your own. Apologies if I brought poor memories to mind.

"But I don't agree that philosophies are a search for rules. For me, philosophies are a search for understanding."

I understand what you mean and to me, that understanding is used to formulate the best rules to live life by.

A good understanding of justice for instance would help develop our various laws and we would live by them.

Regards
DL



GnosticBishop
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Nov 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,686

07 Mar 2015, 8:22 pm

naturalplastic wrote:
Now that we've gone for three pages on tangents lets go back to the original topic.

The topic is "does God follow his own rules?".

The answer is: of course he doesnt. Of course its 'do as I say, and not as I do' because it would impossible for a deity to function otherwise. A diety, and a human, are different entities so different rules would have to apply if a deity really existed.

Assuming God exists how would a person apply the Ten Commandments to God himself?

Is he supposed follow the stricture "thou shalt not steal"?. He owns everything in Creation so how could he steal the property of others even if he wanted to? Ditto "thou shalt not covet".

Murder? If the Universe had a creator then that creator already pre programmed us all to be mortal- so by definition he is already guilty of being the greatest mass murderer possible- because he murders us all. So you can't postulate a ruling deity who is not a mass murderer.

And so on through the commandments.


Logical.

Christians will not like you but I do.

Martin Luther.
“Faith must trample under foot all reason, sense, and understanding.”
“Reason is a whore, the greatest enemy that faith has.”

Regards
DL



GnosticBishop
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Nov 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,686

07 Mar 2015, 8:25 pm

slave wrote:
[

I respectfully disagree with the assumptions upon which your question is based.

Assumptions:
There is a god.
It communicates in Hebrew.
Its will is knowable.
These writings are this entities telepathic transferred thought.
These writings accurately reflect the thoughts of this entity.
etc.................


I do not agree with the assumptions either but to engage believers I have to go by their assumptions.

Regards
DL



slave
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Feb 2012
Age: 113
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,420
Location: Dystopia Planetia

07 Mar 2015, 8:35 pm

GnosticBishop wrote:

Martin Luther.
“Faith must trample under foot all reason, sense, and understanding.”
“Reason is a whore, the greatest enemy that faith has.”

Regards
DL


8O 8O 8O 8O Did he seriously say that?!?!?!?.....WOWOWOWOWOW!! !! !

Thanks for posting that!



Narrator
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Jul 2014
Age: 68
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,060
Location: Melbourne, Australia

07 Mar 2015, 8:41 pm

GnosticBishop wrote:
Well done.

In my reference to the Father Complex I was thinking more of archetype fathers and not necessarily your own. Apologies if I brought poor memories to mind.

"But I don't agree that philosophies are a search for rules. For me, philosophies are a search for understanding."

I understand what you mean and to me, that understanding is used to formulate the best rules to live life by.

A good understanding of justice for instance would help develop our various laws and we would live by them.

Regards
DL

With my father comment, I found both his passing and the archetypal to be closely connected. His passing became a revelation of the inbuilt reaction, not just to him, but also to the archetypal - if that makes sense.

As for philosophy, I don't seek rules. If anything, I seek less rules. I don't know when we evolved to require rules, but humans long ago went rule crazy. We have our own inbuilt nanny state and some of us want more or that. Not me. When it comes to rules, less is more.

We have become so insistent on rules that people will follow laws before ethics. Not all that is lawful is profitable. And ethics to me are matters of logic and empathy, yet people want to codify them into commandments. Laws and rules are slavery. Philosophy, logic and empathy are their antidote.


_________________
I'm not blind to your facial expression - but it may take me a few minutes to comprehend it.
A smile is not always a smile.
A frown is not always a frown.
And a blank look rarely means a blank mind.


aghogday
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Nov 2010
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,323

07 Mar 2015, 11:05 pm

Narrator wrote:
GnosticBishop wrote:
Well done.

In my reference to the Father Complex I was thinking more of archetype fathers and not necessarily your own. Apologies if I brought poor memories to mind.

"But I don't agree that philosophies are a search for rules. For me, philosophies are a search for understanding."

I understand what you mean and to me, that understanding is used to formulate the best rules to live life by.

A good understanding of justice for instance would help develop our various laws and we would live by them.

Regards
DL

With my father comment, I found both his passing and the archetypal to be closely connected. His passing became a revelation of the inbuilt reaction, not just to him, but also to the archetypal - if that makes sense.

As for philosophy, I don't seek rules. If anything, I seek less rules. I don't know when we evolved to require rules, but humans long ago went rule crazy. We have our own inbuilt nanny state and some of us want more or that. Not me. When it comes to rules, less is more.

We have become so insistent on rules that people will follow laws before ethics. Not all that is lawful is profitable. And ethics to me are matters of logic and empathy, yet people want to codify them into commandments. Laws and rules are slavery. Philosophy, logic and empathy are their antidote.


I totally agree with this, and I also lost my father a year ago in May, and experienced a similar experience.

My father was in law enforcement for 46 years in a very patriarchal set of mind and body emotional imbalance.

I finAlly became my own father with feminine and masculine nature balanced; something my father never could do on the feminine part in expressing his emotion in cognitive empathy hardly at all; but yeah, par for the course for some forms of Autism with likely his phenotypical characteristics enhanced by environmental factors.

His identical twin brother, who left law enforcement and stayed with his family still had and has difficulty expressing himself in emotions but has always been a steadfast supporter of all of what his children do, and that truly is a gift to have both a mother and father like that.

But seriously, all my challenges in life are blessings to me now, as all the pain and pleasure makes who I am in a life of total bliss, for NOW..:)

The major problem I see with most organized religions is the suppression of human nature, particularly the freedom of sensual and sexual expression.

Humans are driven to create and produce much more than children through the libido, and even science now shows this as true, per general human creativity and productivity.

Truly the Muslim world does not have a chance in competing against a country that has the kind of expression in sexual freedom that the U.S. does outside of illusory fears of closed minded and OUT OF bodied balanced churches.

To cover human up is to cover up heart, soul, and spirit, at the core driving force of that in the expression of human sensuality and sexuality that drives human emotion, as well, through physical intelligence.

The reason sex sells is it is the main GOD GIVEN AKA Mother Nature TRUE driving force of human being, at least for healthy human beings, fully expressed.

And males are far far behind women on that.

But I for one, BREAK THAT mold, and there's nothing much better than meeting a 'strange' and beautiful young woman who appreciates my skills in dance, and cautioning her I do "FREE verse nude Poetry", when she asks to read my poetry online, and her asking me for the Internet link to see THAT.

Human Nature at it's best, is what that IS, FULLY TURNED ON! FULLY FrEE!

IF THERE IS any miracle in my life, it is that 20 something year-old women, IN THE REAL WORLD, still appreciate my body VERY MUCH, at age 54..;)

AND I STILL stay monogamous with my wife, per the BILL CLINTON definition of sex, per the the modern version of virtual TOTAL human freedom OF EXPRESSION online, IN legal RESTRICTED ADULT Google sponsored BLOGGER WAYS.

And interestingly enough, Google was going to censor it, recently, as a change in internal private corporation rule, until an outcry of customers influenced them to reverse that decision, in favor of Free Expression of Human Identity.

Truly what I do is a new age form of Renaissance Straight Male Nude Art; however, although I DO NOT DO porn, now, I respect the value of Porn, as an alternate route to reproduction, and perhaps AN ALTERNATE AVENUE away from criminal activity, in a world where reducing the population is one of the top issues for long term survival of a species with dwindling resources for subsistence.

So yeah, in a way, PORN RULES, and in my own way, per metaphor, I am a (one of millions) naked leader of that, like the 'Egyptian GOD MIN', except I raise my left arm, instead of right arm, for a balanced way, with Rasta Lion iPhone, in the other hand, instead of the MIN 'way' on 'that' as I 'ain't' afraid of the left, like some folks are, AT ALL. ;)

The world is populated enough; it's time for an alternate route of relaxing RELIGIOUS RULE that 'HEALS' THAT.

AND at least in the U.S., and other tRuly FREE COUNTRIES, IT'S WORKING, AS FERTILITY RATES ARE DROPPING, OVERALL, whatever the actual impact of GREatER human freedom of expression is on THAT.

72,000 virtual online virgins IN free AND EASILY ACCESSIBLE VIEW FOR VIRTUAL VOYEUR REALITY, just BEATS THE HELL OUT OF THE DEVIL OF THAT OTHER TYPE OF ILLUSORY DRIVEN RELIGIOUS MARTYRDOM, in a false PROPHET of Mother Nature TRUE PROMISED afterlife of only 72 virgins, or whatever that number is, by doing the suicide bomber stuff.

HAVING sex with someone and putting it up online, consensually as such, is A MUCH BETTER RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE AND EXPRESSION FOR WORLD PEACE; AND the GOD of Nature 'kNOWS' THAT! TOO!

'Sexual Healing' is COOL!



And I do not kNOw how but I intuitively kNOW that THE 'REAL Jesus' and HIS OR HER wife OR HUSBAND WILL stamp IT WITH 'tHEIR' APPROVAL!


_________________
KATiE MiA FredericK!iI

Gravatar is one of the coolest things ever!! !

http://en.gravatar.com/katiemiafrederick


GnosticBishop
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Nov 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,686

08 Mar 2015, 10:02 am

slave wrote:
GnosticBishop wrote:

Martin Luther.
“Faith must trample under foot all reason, sense, and understanding.”
“Reason is a whore, the greatest enemy that faith has.”

Regards
DL


8O 8O 8O 8O Did he seriously say that?!?!?!?.....WOWOWOWOWOW!! ! ! !

Thanks for posting that!


He said a lot o foolish things ut was only one of many Christians who thought women beneath dogs.

The word and works of God is quite clear, that women were made either to be wives or prostitutes. – Martin Luther, Reformer (1483-1546), Works 12.94

No gown worse becomes a woman than the desire to be wise. – Martin Luther, Reformer (1483-1546)

Men have broad and large chests, and small narrow hips, and more understanding than women, who have but small and narrow breasts, and broad hips, to the end they should remain at home, sit still, keep house, and bear and bring up children. – Martin Luther, Reformer (1483-1546), Table Talk

“If a woman grows weary and, at last, dies from childbearing, it matters not. Let her die from bearing - she is there to do it.”
- Martin Luther

“Be a sinner and sin strongly, but more strongly have faith and rejoice in Christ.”
Martin Luther

Regards
DL



GnosticBishop
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Nov 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,686

08 Mar 2015, 10:08 am

Narrator wrote:
GnosticBishop wrote:
Well done.

In my reference to the Father Complex I was thinking more of archetype fathers and not necessarily your own. Apologies if I brought poor memories to mind.

"But I don't agree that philosophies are a search for rules. For me, philosophies are a search for understanding."

I understand what you mean and to me, that understanding is used to formulate the best rules to live life by.

A good understanding of justice for instance would help develop our various laws and we would live by them.

Regards
DL

With my father comment, I found both his passing and the archetypal to be closely connected. His passing became a revelation of the inbuilt reaction, not just to him, but also to the archetypal - if that makes sense.

As for philosophy, I don't seek rules. If anything, I seek less rules. I don't know when we evolved to require rules, but humans long ago went rule crazy. We have our own inbuilt nanny state and some of us want more or that. Not me. When it comes to rules, less is more.

We have become so insistent on rules that people will follow laws before ethics. Not all that is lawful is profitable. And ethics to me are matters of logic and empathy, yet people want to codify them into commandments. Laws and rules are slavery. Philosophy, logic and empathy are their antidote.


Man has always sought order. Order is all about following rules.

If we were all intelligent enough to do the right things then no rules would be required but that is not the case.

A good analogy for this issue is our roads. Imagine the carnage if we ever tried to remove the rules.

Rules are here to serve and protect the more intelligent from the less intelligent.

We like order and may be pushed to make rules from our instinct to live long and prosper.

Regards
DL



aghogday
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Nov 2010
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,323

08 Mar 2015, 10:09 am

GnosticBishop wrote:
slave wrote:
GnosticBishop wrote:

Martin Luther.
“Faith must trample under foot all reason, sense, and understanding.”
“Reason is a whore, the greatest enemy that faith has.”

Regards
DL


8O 8O 8O 8O Did he seriously say that?!?!?!?.....WOWOWOWOWOW!! ! ! !

Thanks for posting that!


He said a lot o foolish things ut was only one of many Christians who thought women beneath dogs.

The word and works of God is quite clear, that women were made either to be wives or prostitutes. – Martin Luther, Reformer (1483-1546), Works 12.94

No gown worse becomes a woman than the desire to be wise. – Martin Luther, Reformer (1483-1546)

Men have broad and large chests, and small narrow hips, and more understanding than women, who have but small and narrow breasts, and broad hips, to the end they should remain at home, sit still, keep house, and bear and bring up children. – Martin Luther, Reformer (1483-1546), Table Talk

“If a woman grows weary and, at last, dies from childbearing, it matters not. Let her die from bearing - she is there to do it.”
- Martin Luther

“Be a sinner and sin strongly, but more strongly have faith and rejoice in Christ.”
Martin Luther

Regards
DL


Hmm.. in tHis regard.. maybe Martin Luther is the metaphor of Anti-Christ and the rest of 'that' way away from 'Christ'.. as metaphor as well.....


_________________
KATiE MiA FredericK!iI

Gravatar is one of the coolest things ever!! !

http://en.gravatar.com/katiemiafrederick


aghogday
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Nov 2010
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,323

08 Mar 2015, 10:11 am

GnosticBishop wrote:
Narrator wrote:
GnosticBishop wrote:
Well done.

In my reference to the Father Complex I was thinking more of archetype fathers and not necessarily your own. Apologies if I brought poor memories to mind.

"But I don't agree that philosophies are a search for rules. For me, philosophies are a search for understanding."

I understand what you mean and to me, that understanding is used to formulate the best rules to live life by.

A good understanding of justice for instance would help develop our various laws and we would live by them.

Regards
DL

With my father comment, I found both his passing and the archetypal to be closely connected. His passing became a revelation of the inbuilt reaction, not just to him, but also to the archetypal - if that makes sense.

As for philosophy, I don't seek rules. If anything, I seek less rules. I don't know when we evolved to require rules, but humans long ago went rule crazy. We have our own inbuilt nanny state and some of us want more or that. Not me. When it comes to rules, less is more.

We have become so insistent on rules that people will follow laws before ethics. Not all that is lawful is profitable. And ethics to me are matters of logic and empathy, yet people want to codify them into commandments. Laws and rules are slavery. Philosophy, logic and empathy are their antidote.


Man has always sought order. Order is all about following rules.

If we were all intelligent enough to do the right things then no rules would be required but that is not the case.

A good analogy for this issue is our roads. Imagine the carnage if we ever tried to remove the rules.

Rules are here to serve and protect the more intelligent from the less intelligent.

We like order and may be pushed to make rules from our instinct to live long and prosper.

Regards
DL



As in ALL things a balance is required for a 'good' life.

There is reason and there is art.

Reason rules...

Art Loves...

Without the two in balance..

there can be no 'Christ'.....

as human

being...


_________________
KATiE MiA FredericK!iI

Gravatar is one of the coolest things ever!! !

http://en.gravatar.com/katiemiafrederick


Narrator
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Jul 2014
Age: 68
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,060
Location: Melbourne, Australia

08 Mar 2015, 10:40 am

GnosticBishop wrote:
Narrator wrote:
GnosticBishop wrote:
Well done.

In my reference to the Father Complex I was thinking more of archetype fathers and not necessarily your own. Apologies if I brought poor memories to mind.

"But I don't agree that philosophies are a search for rules. For me, philosophies are a search for understanding."

I understand what you mean and to me, that understanding is used to formulate the best rules to live life by.

A good understanding of justice for instance would help develop our various laws and we would live by them.

Regards
DL

With my father comment, I found both his passing and the archetypal to be closely connected. His passing became a revelation of the inbuilt reaction, not just to him, but also to the archetypal - if that makes sense.

As for philosophy, I don't seek rules. If anything, I seek less rules. I don't know when we evolved to require rules, but humans long ago went rule crazy. We have our own inbuilt nanny state and some of us want more or that. Not me. When it comes to rules, less is more.

We have become so insistent on rules that people will follow laws before ethics. Not all that is lawful is profitable. And ethics to me are matters of logic and empathy, yet people want to codify them into commandments. Laws and rules are slavery. Philosophy, logic and empathy are their antidote.


Man has always sought order. Order is all about following rules.

If we were all intelligent enough to do the right things then no rules would be required but that is not the case.

A good analogy for this issue is our roads. Imagine the carnage if we ever tried to remove the rules.

Rules are here to serve and protect the more intelligent from the less intelligent.

We like order and may be pushed to make rules from our instinct to live long and prosper.

Regards
DL

I used to think so too. Animal Farm, Lord of the Flies, etc.

A recent road researcher concluded that the number of road signs these days, meant to improve safety, is actually counter productive because people either miss them or are distracted by them. They found that fewer roadside instructions actually works better. Fewer signs = less carnage. But they won't adopt it because voters believe more rules is better.

People now cite rules rather than morals. If it's legal, that's all that matters. I don't know how old you are, but when I was a kid people would say, "Hey don't do that. It's not right." And people would listen. These days rules are our moral framework. Right and wrong are out, rules are in.

We have become infatuated with rules.


_________________
I'm not blind to your facial expression - but it may take me a few minutes to comprehend it.
A smile is not always a smile.
A frown is not always a frown.
And a blank look rarely means a blank mind.


GnosticBishop
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Nov 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,686

08 Mar 2015, 11:53 am

aghogday wrote:
GnosticBishop wrote:
slave wrote:
GnosticBishop wrote:

Martin Luther.
“Faith must trample under foot all reason, sense, and understanding.”
“Reason is a whore, the greatest enemy that faith has.”

Regards
DL


8O 8O 8O 8O Did he seriously say that?!?!?!?.....WOWOWOWOWOW!! ! ! !

Thanks for posting that!


He said a lot o foolish things ut was only one of many Christians who thought women beneath dogs.

The word and works of God is quite clear, that women were made either to be wives or prostitutes. – Martin Luther, Reformer (1483-1546), Works 12.94

No gown worse becomes a woman than the desire to be wise. – Martin Luther, Reformer (1483-1546)

Men have broad and large chests, and small narrow hips, and more understanding than women, who have but small and narrow breasts, and broad hips, to the end they should remain at home, sit still, keep house, and bear and bring up children. – Martin Luther, Reformer (1483-1546), Table Talk

“If a woman grows weary and, at last, dies from childbearing, it matters not. Let her die from bearing - she is there to do it.”
- Martin Luther

“Be a sinner and sin strongly, but more strongly have faith and rejoice in Christ.”
Martin Luther

Regards
DL


Hmm.. in tHis regard.. maybe Martin Luther is the metaphor of Anti-Christ and the rest of 'that' way away from 'Christ'.. as metaphor as well.....


All priests a imam are lying continually so trying to dither them out is hard task.

Faith closes the mind. It is pure idol worship.

Faith is a way to quit using, "God given" power of Reason and Logic, and cause the faithful to embrace doctrines that moral people reject.

The God of the OT says, “Come now, and let us reason together,” [Isaiah 1:18]

How can literalists reason with God when they must ignore reason and logic and discard them when turning into literalist?

Those who are literalists can only reply somewhat in the fashion that Martin Luther did.
“Faith must trample under foot all reason, sense, and understanding.”
“Reason is a whore, the greatest enemy that faith has.”

This attitude effectively kills all worthy communication that non-theists can have with theist. Faith closes the mind as it is pure idol worship.

Literalism is an evil practice that hides the true messages of myths. We cannot show our faith based friends that they are wrong through their faith colored glasses. Their faith also plugs their ears.

Regards
DL



Bataar
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Sep 2008
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,919
Location: Post Falls, ID

09 Mar 2015, 10:50 am

GnosticBishop wrote:
Bataar wrote:
GnosticBishop wrote:
naturalplastic wrote:
If God really existed then...he would have the right to "think of himself as God".

How is he doing evil?

Burning us in hell? He is presumably punishing us for wrong doing, so how is that evil?


What finite sin do you know of that is deserving of infinite punishment?

Why is punishment given? To cause a change and rehabilitate. Right?

Even if one changes his attitude and rehabilitates in hell, God still destroys that soul, and that is quite immoral and evil. Right?

If God is the only God then what Gods are we not supposed to put above him?

Regards
DL

Don't view hell has a punishment. Generally that's not the case. God is merciful and will allow us to go where we choose. God won't force anyone to be with him in Heaven for eternity. Heaven is a gift that we are free to reject. If everyone went to heaven regardless, it would not be a gift because it would then be forced on us.


You follow the immoral thinking of Christians if you believe the garbage you wrote.

If hell is not a punishment the God would be rewarding sinners. Not much point in denigrating people and then rewarding them for being as created to be.

When some friend rejects you, do you curse him to hell or just let him walk?

Regards
DL

If a friend rejects me, he chooses not to come into my house and walks away on his own. That is the same with God.



GnosticBishop
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Nov 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,686

09 Mar 2015, 12:04 pm

Bataar wrote:
GnosticBishop wrote:
Bataar wrote:
GnosticBishop wrote:
naturalplastic wrote:
If God really existed then...he would have the right to "think of himself as God".

How is he doing evil?

Burning us in hell? He is presumably punishing us for wrong doing, so how is that evil?


What finite sin do you know of that is deserving of infinite punishment?

Why is punishment given? To cause a change and rehabilitate. Right?

Even if one changes his attitude and rehabilitates in hell, God still destroys that soul, and that is quite immoral and evil. Right?

If God is the only God then what Gods are we not supposed to put above him?

Regards
DL

Don't view hell has a punishment. Generally that's not the case. God is merciful and will allow us to go where we choose. God won't force anyone to be with him in Heaven for eternity. Heaven is a gift that we are free to reject. If everyone went to heaven regardless, it would not be a gift because it would then be forced on us.


You follow the immoral thinking of Christians if you believe the garbage you wrote.

If hell is not a punishment the God would be rewarding sinners. Not much point in denigrating people and then rewarding them for being as created to be.

When some friend rejects you, do you curse him to hell or just let him walk?

Regards
DL

If a friend rejects me, he chooses not to come into my house and walks away on his own. That is the same with God.


Now your just a liar. Typical Christian.

Luke 19:27 But those enemies of mine who did not want me to be king over them—bring them here and kill them in front of me.

Regards
DL