There Will Never Be A N****r At SAE!
So, how long until you propose some sort of final solution to the black question?

I stated the "proposed solution" earlier in the thread.
And it is not my solution; it a solution coming from the governor of where I live, also Jeb Bush concurred recently. The plan is to bring in highly educated immigrants into black cities so they are less % black.
See, http://www.crainsdetroit.com/article/20 ... to-detroit
Black groups are against this, because they see this as non-blacks taking away power from black people. So, the plan appears to have gone nowhere.
here the NY Times points at that what we are talking about is bringing in 50,000 Indian and Chinese people into African American communities
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/06/opini ... .html?_r=0
What are your ideas? or do you just participate in topics in an attempt to ridicule people ?
Welcome to the complexity of REALITY.

Notwithstanding the 50% arrest rate of my blue population (mainly simple crimes and misdemeanors), it's still sensible to feel less safe around them than the yellow and red people based purely on chance (not to mention they only make up 10% of the population).
Chance is a perfectly valid means of dictating behavior. You don't drive too fast, you don't play with wild lions, you don't jump into unknown bodies of water, and so on. You can do these things, but the chance of something bad happening increases if you do.
Hence, discrimination can be a good thing. It's something we evolved to help us survive.
Keep in mind, once you get into the college environment, the type of crimes you see in places with gangs tend to be low, like the drive bys and shootings although you see assault and stealing on campus, and the occasional drunken brawl, mass shootings and shootings in general are pretty low even in colleges with a lot of ethnicity and it's plain as day why that is.
People going to college are making a concerted effort to improve their lives and station in life. It isn't based on how someone looks, their gender, or anything but who they are on the inside. They have one thing in common. They want a better life for themselves. That is the main reason they are there.
Pretty much everyone paid lip service (at least) to the idea that what they did was wrong, but a lot of people balked at any punishment for people at an individual level. Others used the incident as an opportunity to attack the "Greek System" as a whole....
The discussion got pretty heated. In the end, one student, (an older, black female) walked out of class...
I pretty much stayed out of the debate, but I did find the whole thing very informative.
A few observations:
I don't think this is a problem with Frats only. I think it has more to do with any sort of exclusionary social group.
One of the attractions of these groups is that not everyone can get in... that's really the whole point. AND, that is EXACTLY what they were singing about. The whole point of the song is that, while you might be the dumbest, most inbred cracker there is, you are better than every N****r on the planet because you are a member of the group and they aren't.
Also, I think what we see in that video is a prime example of the ugly, dangerous side of social groups in general--not just Frats...
There seems to be a form of group think happening here. I'm sure that most of those guys would never have sung that song on their own. However, in a highly cohesive group, all it takes is one douche bag with a bad idea and a one or two others who go along to cause a domino-effect. The others simply follow along because of their emotional ties and desire to fit in. That's how social groups work, and why mobs sometimes commit atrocities...
And finally, from the incident in class, I learned one other thing. Being able to discuss racism as an interesting abstract, academic problem is just one more perk of white privilege. Whites can discuss the issue, debate it, condemn it and put it away when we get bored, because it doesn't really affect us. Non-whites cannot do that. They have to live with and deal with racist attitudes everyday, whether they want to or not. They can't put it away when they grow tired of it.
....and even more finally

What happened--a bunch of white frat boys acting like assholes--might not seem like such a big deal, but I think it is. Here's why. Those kids are going to be in positions of power in a few years. They are going to be doctors, lawyers, business executives, and HR people in the future. They are going to be judges like the one who just resigned in Ferguson Mo. Their biases matter because, collectively, they will affect thousands of lives.
We don't need people like that in charge.
So, what do you guys think?
what is SAE?
You can complain about the issues of racial profiling and the stereotypes about black people. However there is only one way to actually get rid of the stereotypes and profiles and that is to prove they aren't true. Police target blacks more because blacks commit more crimes. Even if every police officer in the country were black it wouldn't change anything. Blacks would still be targeted alot more by police because they are statistically more of a danger than any other race. Complaining about racism isn't going to make the problems go away, and I personally think all of these protests are going to have unintended consequences like an increase in crime and more police getting shot and things like that.
So do you know the two men that engaged in this chant and expelled? It is true, this chant's been in the OU chapter of SAE for at least three years now. You talk like you are angry the chant was even recorded but if you are going to say something, then people have the right to hear what you are saying unless it is known you are wanting it to be kept confidential and this doesn't appear to be the case. Part of freedom of speech means to owning up what you say. It's childish to think you can just say what you want and not have to own your words in any way.
I read a statement from the OU quarterback Trevor Knight. He is pretty much taking a leadership role here and he is showing wisdom in the matter. You should read what he has to say and listen to him.
GoonSquad
Veteran

Joined: 11 May 2007
Age: 55
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,748
Location: International House of Paincakes...
Welcome to the complexity of REALITY.

Notwithstanding the 50% arrest rate of my blue population (mainly simple crimes and misdemeanors), it's still sensible to feel less safe around them than the yellow and red people based purely on chance (not to mention they only make up 10% of the population).
Chance is a perfectly valid means of dictating behavior. You don't drive too fast, you don't play with wild lions, you don't jump into unknown bodies of water, and so on. You can do these things, but the chance of something bad happening increases if you do.
Hence, discrimination can be a good thing. It's something we evolved to help us survive.
I see your point...
So, by your logic it would be sensible for employers and HR people to also fear all blue people and avoid employing any, right?
...because, after all, we want our places of business and employment to be safe as well, don't we?
_________________
No man is free who is not master of himself.~Epictetus
GoonSquad
Veteran

Joined: 11 May 2007
Age: 55
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,748
Location: International House of Paincakes...
So, why do you think more blacks commit crimes?
Are they just inherently criminal?
_________________
No man is free who is not master of himself.~Epictetus
This just gets worse and worse! Now Sigma Alpha Epsilon has hired Attorney Stephen Jones. In case you don't know who he is, he's the same lawyer who represented Tim McVeigh. What they need to do is to just let it go, let things simmer down, then try to get back into the University in a few years. Now they are just going to make it worse for themselves, especially if they sue the school. If the University has a policy against that kind of speech and students broke the rules and got caught, not much the fraternity can do about the disciplinary action. It's really aggravating that instead of shutting up about it, they must continue this boo hoo hooing and it's only going to prolong this. Time to own up and shut the mouth.
Betcha anything if anyone at OU went up to the two and said anything nearly as bad to either of them saying they would hang them from a tree so stay away, something to that effect, those two would be the first ones to go yelling about that wanting whomever said it to be disciplined by the University because most the time, the ones yelling the loudest are ALWAYS the ones who yelp first when their toes are stepped on. They want to be the only ones and woe be to anyone who dares says something to them. Typical double standard.
It appears that the kids were kicked out because they were practicing free speech on a private bus off campus?
How is this public university able to have a policy that punishes people for free speech that is protected by the first amendment in the Constitution ?
The kids probably suffered financial loss on tuition and books. As well, as it might be difficult to change schools so abruptly. All because the university doesn't believe in free speech ? Why not sue them ? Show them what hypocrites they are for promoting free speech in their school, and as soon as they disagree with it, then they boot you out.
SAE issued this statement in response to a press conference with Stephen Jones:
This page contains the latest statements regarding the current media coverage of Sigma Alpha Epsilon. Previous updates are archived below.
The spokesperson for Sigma Alpha Epsilon is Brandon Weghorst, Associate Executive Director of Communications, who can be reached at (847) 424-3038 or at [email protected].
Statement in Response to March 13 Stephen Jones Press Conference
Earlier today, attorney Stephen Jones held a brief press conference to announce that he has been retained by the University of Oklahoma SAE board of alumni, which is the group that oversees the Oklahoma Kappa chapter. The national organization is not involved in retaining Mr. Jones and, as of now, we have no further information about his intentions.
Our priority now remains squarely focused on making sure we continue to proactively address this issue in a way that reflects our zero-tolerance for any kind of discrimination and upholds the values of our Fraternity. We teach our members to serve as role models in their communities and to live up to our creed, “The True Gentleman.”
As such, when members fail to do so – as they did at the University of Oklahoma – we do not hesitate to take corrective action, starting with closing the chapter and initiating a process to take action against any members who were involved. As we continue to review this matter – as Mr. Jones stated – we are committed to following the due diligence and protocols that we have set forth in our Fraternity Laws, as they are designed to enable us to make deliberate, thoughtful decisions that reflect our commitment to our standards and to our members.
http://www.sae.net/oklahoma
I hope it's okay to post their info in the forum. I plan to send an email urging not to sue the university, but to find a way to sort out this matter that will be of benefit to all. If you all have an opinion, I urge you to email, too. Let it be known what you think they should do.
Last edited by ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo on 13 Mar 2015, 5:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
It appears that the kids were kicked out because they were practicing free speech on a private bus off campus?
How is this public university able to have a policy that punishes people for free speech that is protected by the first amendment in the Constitution ?
The kids probably suffered financial loss on tuition and books. As well, as it might be difficult to change schools so abruptly. All because the university doesn't believe in free speech ? Why not sue them ? Show them what hypocrites they are for promoting free speech in their school, and as soon as they disagree with it, then they boot you out.
In my town, the schools are responsible for what happens on buses off the campus.
Even though yes, it is the alumni in OK that hired the attorney, it still might be a good idea to let the fraternity know your opinion. The attorney was not hired by SAE but the fraternity might still have influence on their alumni and it can look like the attorney was hired by the actual fraternity. At first, everyone thought it was SAE who hired Stephen Jones.
"Oklahoma could make a decent argument that the students’ chant created a hostile educational environment and was thus unprotected speech, but these scholars are likely correct as a predictive matter. If this situation were litigated before the current Supreme Court, the students would almost certainly win".
"The frat boys’ howls are reminiscent of the Westboro Baptist Church’s “God hates fags” protests near military funerals, which the Supreme Court protected a few years ago".
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/arc ... ch/387718/
The school needs to pay up for what it did to these kids. I would think it would be embarrassing for the university to lose in court, and find out that they don't even know the basics of the law. How can they even be a university when they won't even protect the free speech of their students ?
"Oklahoma could make a decent argument that the students’ chant created a hostile educational environment and was thus unprotected speech, but these scholars are likely correct as a predictive matter. If this situation were litigated before the current Supreme Court, the students would almost certainly win".
"The frat boys’ howls are reminiscent of the Westboro Baptist Church’s “God hates fags” protests near military funerals, which the Supreme Court protected a few years ago".
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/arc ... ch/387718/
The school needs to pay up for what it did to these kids. I would think it would be embarrassing for the university to lose in court, and find out that they don't even know the basics of the law. How can they even be a university when they won't even protect the free speech of their students ?
Oh so you are making the argument, anyone can say anything to anyone at at a public school because you do realize the ones crying the loudest whenever they get yelled at are the ones in these fraternities? They will demand action against everyone else but want to be allowed to say whatever they want, no matter how hostile. Isn't it time people grew the f up and practiced the golden rule?