Page 3 of 3 [ 36 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3


Do you agree with this prophecy?
Yes, I do. 17%  17%  [ 2 ]
No, I do not. 75%  75%  [ 9 ]
It is partially correct. 8%  8%  [ 1 ]
I do not understand. 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Total votes : 12

AlexandertheSolitary
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Dec 2006
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 945
Location: Melbourne

05 Jun 2015, 1:24 am

Kraichgauer wrote:
Coming from a mainline Protestant, Lutheran tradition, the take on Revelations I was taught is that it's for the most part a recounting of events in the 1st century, when persecution of the early church had been current events. The bizarre imagery in the book owes much to the apocryphal style of writing that was used in Persia, in order to hide a message of a persecuted sect that would otherwise be considered seditious by the Roman authorities. The Beast, and 666, are in fact references to the Roman Emperor Nero, who had persecuted the early church. And like the Beast, there had been rumors that Nero was still alive after his death, as mentioned by Tacitus. So, do I consider Revelations to be prophecy? In a word: no. In fact, the fathers of the Protestant Reformation, Martin Luther and John Calvin, personally believed Revelations should never have been canonized.


Could you provide a reference for Luther and Calvin? I had heard that Constantine did not like it, reading it as anti-Roman propaganda and all - Babylon had been used as a wry nickname among early Christians for Rome. But did not Luther and others actually apply some of these prophecies to the Pope and the Roman Catholic Church? Not sure how that can be consistent. I remember him being disparaging about the Epistle of James, and he was certainly wrong there. The early parts of the Book of Revelation do indeed reveal something of the seven churches in Asia Minor (currently Turkey) but parts of it are clearly intended as end time prophecy. It is not a priori impossible that some parts may have been fulfilled over a longer period of time, but I am a bit uncomfortable with the blanket rejection of it as anything other than 1st century political allegory. At the same time, many generations have been convinced they lived during the Last Days (including understandably during the Reformation) and I am not sure what gain there would be in obsessing as to who the Beast will be. One would probably be wrong, and it would not change anything anyway. The responsibilities of Christians will remain the same. It might be helpful to avoid being deceived, but if one is striving to be obedient while reading the Scriptures Christ surely will not permit His diciples to fall.


_________________
You are like children playing in the market-place saying, "We piped for you and you would not dance, we wailed a dirge for you and you would not weep."


Last edited by AlexandertheSolitary on 05 Jun 2015, 1:44 am, edited 1 time in total.

Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

05 Jun 2015, 1:34 am

AlexandertheSolitary wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Coming from a mainline Protestant, Lutheran tradition, the take on Revelations I was taught is that it's for the most part a recounting of events in the 1st century, when persecution of the early church had been current events. The bizarre imagery in the book owes much to the apocryphal style of writing that was used in Persia, in order to hide a message of a persecuted sect that would otherwise be considered seditious by the Roman authorities. The Beast, and 666, are in fact references to the Roman Emperor Nero, who had persecuted the early church. And like the Beast, there had been rumors that Nero was still alive after his death, as mentioned by Tacitus. So, do I consider Revelations to be prophecy? In a word: no. In fact, the fathers of the Protestant Reformation, Martin Luther and John Calvin, personally believed Revelations should never have been canonized.


Could you provide a reference for Luther and Calvin? I had heard that Constantine did not like it, reading it as anti-Roman propaganda and all - Babylon had been used as a wry nickname among early Christians for Rome. But did not Luther and others actually apply some of these prophecies to the Pope and the Roman Catholic Church? Not sure how that can be consistent. I remember him being disparaging about the Epistle of James, and he was certainly wrong there. The early parts of the Book of Revelation do indeed reveal something of the seven churches in Asia Minor (currently Turkey) but parts of it are clearly intended as end time prophecy. It is not a priori impossible that some parts may have been fulfilled over a longer period of time, but I am a bit uncomfortable with the blanket rejection of it as anything other than 1st century political allegory. At the same time, many generations have been convinced they lived during the Last Days (including understandably during the Reformation) and I am not sure what gain there would be in obsessing as to who the Beast will be. One would probably be wrong, and it would not change anything anyway. The responsibilities of Christians will remain the same. It might be helpful to avoid being deceived, but if one is striving to be obedient while reading the Scriptures


I will have to look up exact quotes by Luther and Calvin, but I do know their opinions of the book.
As for Luther's view of the Papacy, he had in fact called the Pope "Antichrist" - that is, one who is opposed to Christ - but not "THE" Antichrist, as there is no such belief in Lutheran theology. This is a point that has been misunderstood about Lutheran theology by Non-Lutherans in modern times.
As for Luther's rejection of James due to his seeming promotion of salvation by works - Luther later had reversed himself, primarily due to the one line written by James: "I will show you my faith by showing you my works."


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


AlexandertheSolitary
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Dec 2006
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 945
Location: Melbourne

05 Jun 2015, 1:39 am

Michae1 wrote:
The Beast Revelation

This letter is dedicated to all Christians.

The following letter is a summary of Revelation 13. Its purpose is to show the method used in finding the conclusions which have been stated. Nothing new has been added from my previous letters. It is more of a compilation of them all. This writing is the same material in different words. The Bible uses this same method of explanation. There are four Gospels. In each you see a different view of the same material. This can be beneficial because the meaning becomes more exact. Although, if this is a first time reader, then this will all be news to you. With that in mind, here we go.


The first thing that should be addressed when doing any study of Bible prophecy is what questions do I intend to answer. Some of these questions can seem a little simplistic, but their answers are much more complicated. In my studies there were only a few questions that I saw as needing an answer. My questions were very simple. First, who is this individual who is identified by the number 666? Second, who is the false prophet and how does he make the whole world worship the beast whose number is 666. Another question has to do with these same individuals. Could these two individuals be the same person, or for that matter Satan himself? Where is Satan during all this? That last question is very important. It actually goes straight to the answer of all the questions. Finally, when would someone expect to see these individuals on the Earth? Literally, what time frame should I see them? Those are the questions. The answers are much more involved.

This narrative will attempt to show how the answers are figured out. These answers can be seen from events that happen in the nightly news. This leads me to a key, which most of us know, but most of us forget. The Bible is a history book. Some events have happened, while some are waiting to happen. It is the ones that have not happened that we are most concerned with. Here is another key. By the way, these keys I speak of are keys to understanding. The Lord spoke in parables. The reason he gave was that it was for some to know the mysteries of God, while it was for some to know not. In hearing, they do not hear. In seeing, they do not see. I compare it to telling the truth, while hiding it at the same time. Many of the parables that the Lord spoke he immediately gave an answer to. He showed how he used certain symbols and words to describe subjects and then gave their meanings. Now for the punch line. The Lord also spoke in parables that he did not identify. These parables go straight to the hidden meaning of these end times. Another key is word substitution. An example of this is a pretty well-known item from Revelation. This word substitution deals with Revelation 13:1. The beast has seven heads and ten horns. In Revelation 17 those heads and horns are defined. The heads are identified as mountains, while the horns are identified as kings. This changes the whole picture of what the beast is symbolically to what it is literally. Now Rev.13:1 can be read as follows with just the items discussed thus far. And I saw a beast rise up out of the sea having seven mountains and ten kings. That is a simple and easy word substitution. Know that this will happen many times throughout the Bible.

Now, getting back to the questions. The question is, where is Satan? If this question can be answered, you can eliminate some others. Some prophecy teachers believe that Satan is the beast, or that Satan is the false prophet. This interpretation is misleading, and it also creates a stumbling block in the path to a proper interpretation. I almost always get this question. How can you know who the beast is when he cannot be revealed? 2nd Thess. Chapter 2 states that he cannot be revealed, until something is removed first. Most scholars have this part right. That is a picture of the Rapture. What they have wrong is that Satan and the beast are not the same individual. Satan cannot be revealed until after the rapture, but he is not the beast. Therefore, I can identify the beast and his false prophet. People say prove it. So I did. I told them how to understand using the keys that I have mentioned. Revelation 13 is a parable, but God is not giving the definition, or the explanation. This one is for us to figure out. Ok, so where is Satan? In the book of Job, we get a view of Satan's abilities. In one scene, he is discussing with God about Job. Question, where is God? He is in heaven. Also, in his conversation with God Satan is talking as if he knows and has seen Job. God declares that he can do whatever he wants to Job, but he was not allowed to kill him. Now we know something else about Satan. He also has access to the Earth, and can affect peoples lives. So, it appears that Satan can be everywhere he wants to be, on Earth or in heaven. We know Satan and his angels will be cast out of heaven as per Revelation 12. This would further the idea that he is now in heaven. We also see Satan one other time, when he tempted Christ during his time on Earth. It says that he was taken to the wilderness to be tempted of Satan? Most people, and rightly so, have thought the wilderness to be a place on Earth, but this is a parable I believe. The Lord was in the wilderness and was tempted by Satan, but the wilderness is in heaven. This parable is read in Isaiah 35. It is the wilderness and the solitary place where the redeemed of the Lord walk. So, this last item being the most hard to prove, suffice it to say, that when Rev.12 says Satan will be cast out, he must be there in heaven to be cast out. Alright, now we can answer a couple questions. One, Satan is himself, and he is in heaven. Therefore, he is not the beast or the false prophet. These three work together, but each has his own identity.

Now to dissect Revelation 13. As I have already stated, Revelation 13 is a word substitution parable. The seven heads are seven mountains and the ten horns are ten kings. Ok, we know from this description that the beast as described is a group of possibly ten countries. This brings me to another point. There are three definitions for the beast in Revelation 13. The first is a group of countries rising up out of the sea. The second is in Rev.13:11 and is a beast with two horns (kings). Remember horns are kings as per Rev. 17. Finally, there is a beast who is identified by the number 666. It is this last beast that causes all to receive a mark and that no man can buy and sell save he who has the mark, his number, or his name. There are three items here. Nowhere does it say that the mark is the number 666. This might have been a good guess 20 yrs. ago , but it is pretty hard to believe. Imagine people running around with a mark of 666 on their right hands. It sounds like a cartoon, but this is what the prophecy teachers want you to believe. Ok, another problem that sounds like a cartoon is the interpretation of the word "all." They want you to believe that no man could buy or sell if they did not worship the beast and take his mark. Interpreting the word "all" to mean everyone in the world. This is not the case. For one, we know that the beast is made up of only possibly ten countries. Everyone in this world lives in roughly 190 countries. I don't think we could possibly mean everyone. How about, all of those people concerned with the mark. Also, how do you cause all people concerned to receive a mark, and why? The most obvious way to mark everyone is at the voting booth. All people, rich and poor, small and great, or free and bond are potential voters. So, Mahmoud Abbas was elected president of the Palestinian Authority, and in the process all voters received an indelible ink mark on their right hands. This mark was to prevent double voting and corruption in the election. Ok, we have a mark. It is not 666. At this point he fits the part, but not completely. Still, there is no ready identification of 666 concerning him. This election was in January 2005.

Back to Rev.13. We have seven mountains and ten kings. Prophecy teachers want us to believe that a city with seven mountains is the seat of the antichrist and he rules with ten nations. Their logical conclusion was the Europe Union and the Vatican. This started the revived Roman empire theory. This theory has been around since the reformation. It is hard to believe this charade has gone on so long. Teachers are still preaching the Revived Roman Empire. This theory had some validity before the twentieth century and now has to be eliminated. None of these teachers could have predicted the fall of the Ottoman Empire and its division into so many separate sovereign nations. Back to our word substitution. There is an interesting item here concerning the word mountains in scripture. The word mountains can have two meanings. It can be either a mountain range, or a nation. This is the hardest part of this whole exercise, trying to figure out what mountains are describing. Teachers will have you believe it is a city with seven mountains. In actual fact, mountains here are referring to nations. This also pertains to the head wound. The wound was not a literal head wound at all, but was a nation that was wounded. The beast's head or nation was wounded and was healed. This is the Palestinian Authority after the beginning of the Oslo Accords. The land that Israel possessed was now being given back to the Palestinians and the beast's nation is being healed. Ok, so now I have seven nations and ten kings, Rev.13:1. Why do I have three more kings than nations? It seems I have a king for each nation, but three left over. In Daniel in says the beast subdued three kings. These three kings don't necessarily have to be from different countries. It seems so, but is not expressly mentioned. It is another parable. The three kings who were subdued by the beast were Israeli Prime Ministers. These three Prime Ministers all served during the seven years of the Oslo Accords and were voted out of office because of terror perpetrated during Yasser Arafat's rule. Now, I am down to seven nations. These seven nations will wage war. I can easily see seven nations that will wage war here very soon; Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, Egypt, Iran and the Palestinian Authority or Iraq, and there opponent Israel. This is exactly the same beast that is presented in Rev.17:10, just in a slightly different appearance. There are seven kings, five are fallen. This means five kings were defeated in war. Israel is referred to the "one that is," and the one that came later is the Palestinian Authority. This is a description of Israel's war for Independence. Literally, this was the beast being born. The war in 1967 is the beast rising up out of the sea in Rev.13:1. It was the unresolved issues of this conflict that resulted in the Oslo Accords of 1993. This seven year peace treaty was confirmed by Yitzhak Rabin and Yasser Arafat.

Now, there is another beast in Rev.13:11. This beast has two horns or kings. This is a picture of the Palestinian Authority after the elections of January 2006. This is when Hamas ran in the elections and won a majority in parliament. Now the P.A. was a country with two kings. Abbas was the President and Ismail Haniyeh was the Prime Minister. Here is where the problem with money came about. Western Nations did not want to donate money to a known terrorist organization so looked for a way they could still fund Abbas's P.A., but not let any money get to Hamas. This is when the number 666 identified an individual. The temporary international mechanism was adopted on June 16, 2006. This program allowed Western Nations to donate funds directly to Abbas, while bypassing Hamas. If you were a member of Fatah, or on Abbas's payroll you got paid. This is how the people were allowed to buy and sell. They received salaries, whereas before the mechanism, they had no way of getting paid from the Government. Hamas did not receive salaries. Also, Hamas did not receive the mark of the beast. They boycotted the elections for President in Jan. 2005.
It is more obvious who is being talked about the closer you get to the end.

In conclusion, to my three beast definitions. Mahmoud Abbas fits all three definitions. He was a member of the P.A. when it was formed. He took over from Yasser Arafat after his death. He was one of the two kings of the second beast in Rev.13:11. Lastly, he is the one identified by the number 666, which could have been Arafat had he lived.

Now, concerning the the false prophet. The following four verses below all refer to the false prophet, Ismail Haniyeh.

Rev.13:11- and I beheld another beast coming up out of the Earth, and he had two horns like a lamb, and he spake as a dragon.
Rev.13:12- And he exercises all the power of the first beast before him, and causes the earth and them which dwell therein, to worship the first beast, whose deadly wound was healed.
Rev.13:13- "And he does great wonders, so that he makes fire come down from heaven on the Earth in the sight of men".
Rev.13:15- And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast, should be killed.


Hamas exercised all the power of the first beast (Abbas's P.A.) because they were now an equal partner in the Government. Also, the leader of Hamas caused them to worship or honor the first beast because Hamas would not honor the first beast. The first beast was the PA without Hamas as a member. The image of the beast is what the Government of Mahmoud Abbas represented. Verse 12 does not mention the image yet, we are just informed that the false prophet caused them to worship the first beast. Verse 14 and 15 gives the details of how that worshipping or honor was to commence. An image was created of the first beast that he (the false prophet) caused to be honored. This image of the beast is three items; the recognition of Israel, the honoring of all prior Palestinian agreements, and a renunciation of terror.

The last question I think that needs addressed is how do you know the timing is right? Meaning, there have been so many translations, how do you know that this one is correct? This is a question I always get asked. The answer, in my mind, is sort of a mix between two different prophecies. The first is the seven day prophecy as recorded in Genesis. It is a similitude between this and the amount of recorded time that has already happened on Earth. In the book of Peter, God says one day to him is as a thousand years. If that idea is applied to the Genesis creation, everyday that God created something one thousand years passed. Finally, on the last day he rested from his work, and his rest was one thousand years or one of God's days. This was one full week or 7000 years. After God's rest he started his work again, and he created Adam. Starting with Adam, it was approximately 4000 years to the time of Christ. Also, we know that Christ was here roughly 2000 years ago. If God was to be consistent with his one week schedule, then we could expect his day of rest to fall somewhere after the year two thousand. 4000 plus 2000 is six days and on the seventh he rested for one thousand years. This is not an exact estimate, but it can put you in the right ballpark when searching for the correct timing of Revelation. This is the estimate. The next item is more exact. Daniel 9:27 says that he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week. Many in Hebrew is Rab. This was a covenant confirmed with Yitzhak Rabin. It was the beginning of land for peace, or the Oslo Accords. When you see this agreement happen you should be aware that this prophecy will last seven years. There is only one problem with this item. Prior to it happening, everyone thought that the end of the seventh year of the agreement God would return and begin his rest. Well, that did not happen. The reason was a logical misinterpretation. It just mentions that this agreement must occur along with the prophecies mentioned, not that they would all happen and end on the last day of the seventh year. This has thrown everyone watching off-course for a time. Although, this was not such a terrible mistake if the watcher could see the right answer and get his, or her perspective back. When you have these two items coinciding at the expected time, then you know Revelation can be interpreted with accuracy. The events should start happening, as they have, as I have recorded in this letter.

May God bless all who read this letter.

Michael


How do you know that by the time of the fulfillment of the relevant prophecy, all the Earth will be united (in some sense) under relatively few rulers, with all subordinate to the Beast? You seem to dismiss the revived Roman Empire somewhat readily - how do you know that this will never occur? You seem to be prepared to interpret other passages at whim - why are you quite so certain? You appear to relativise the "all" because it does not fit your interpretation.

Of course it could be argued that Babylon may not necessarily be either Rome or the actual city of Babylon in what is Iraq; there is precedent in Revelation and elsewhere in Scripture to use names symbolically. Others argue for some sort of continuity between imperial and papal Rome.

And does not the Book of Revelation itself contain a reference to the seven hills? You seem quick to condemn others for not following your own interpretation.


_________________
You are like children playing in the market-place saying, "We piped for you and you would not dance, we wailed a dirge for you and you would not weep."


AlexandertheSolitary
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Dec 2006
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 945
Location: Melbourne

05 Jun 2015, 1:56 am

pezar wrote:
OK, I skimmed over much of this and it seems that you, like most others, make the mistake of assuming that right now is the End Time. It is not. The End Time was during the Roman Empire.

666: Revelation says that this is the mark OF A MAN. So, who in Roman times could it have been? Some have pointed towards Nero, the Roman Emperor who launched the first big persecution of Christians by Roman authorities. Nero was called "Nero Caesar". In Greek, the original language of the New Testament, this name was "Neron Keser". Each Greek letter has a numeric value. When Neron Keser is changed to its Greek numeric value, and added up, one gets the number 666.

No man could buy or sell, unless he had the Mark: In Roman times, nobles had a "crest" (today called a "coat of arms"). Each Roman coin had the visage of the current emperor on one side and his crest on the other. Romans developed the method of flipping a coin to determine a dispute from this fact-since a Roman denarus was the "mark" of the emperor, he was assumed to approve or disapprove of something in absentia through a coin flip. As in our time, in Rome money was needed to buy or sell. Since that money had the "mark" of Nero, during Nero's reign, money was the "mark of the beast, without which no man could buy or sell".

Now, the Mark is IN the right hand or ON the forehead. Most people are right handed, thus the "mark" in their right hands would be required to buy or sell. In Roman times, the crest of the emperor was on the forehead of each centurion's helmet. (One can still see this in military caps today, with the eagle of the US Seal on each cap.) Then as now, law enforcement and soldiers got special deals from shopkeepers eager to curry favor.

The city of seven hills is obviously Rome, as you note. But NOT modern Rome, but the capital of the Empire.

That's only for starters. Looking at Revelation as if it predicts the modern world is folly. Its point was to prophesy the end of the Roman Empire and a new order where Christianity would rule. "Babylon", which is so frequently mentioned, is the Roman Empire. The "Second Coming of Christ" is not Jesus riding a white horse down from the sky, but the replacement of decadent, sinful Rome with a "pure" Christian empire.

Some scholars point towards Diocletian as the "second Beast" who would come just before the triumph of Christianity. The destruction of Rome by the Germanics in 411 is the destruction of "Babylon the Great" in "one hour". The cleansing fire that destroys the world is Rome being burned during the 411 invasion.

If there is any similarity, it is between America and Rome. There are whole books that point to similarities between the Roman Hegemon and the American Hegemon. I believe it was Mark Twain who said that history may not necessarily repeat itself, but it rhymes.


But even with your interpretation you still acknowledge the book as predicting events significantly beyond the time of its writing. Some of the prophecies are not consistent with a fulfillment in 411, so if you acknowledge it as prophecy at all it seems cavalier to dismiss any of it being fulfilled at a later date. The Second Coming and New Jerusalem do not appear to have taken place, nor is the Christianised Roman/Byzantine Empire a complete fulfillment. You may be right about America being the current Babylon; it does have similarities with Rome.


_________________
You are like children playing in the market-place saying, "We piped for you and you would not dance, we wailed a dirge for you and you would not weep."