Does conservative hypocrisy infuriate anybody else?

Post Reply New Topic

Which is quite consistent with my view on the death penalty. Further a fetus with no brain has no will. Nor does a collection of cells that hasn't formed nerves or a heart. Or the fetus that has died inside the woman and is poisoning her. And just because a woman (or a girl) has free will doesn't mean she's always permitted or able to exercise it, as previously mentioned.


From Merriam Webster Online:
Origin and Etymology of pedagogue. Middle English pedagoge, from Latin paedagogus, from Greek paidagōgos, slave who escorted children to school, from paid- ped- + agōgos leader, from agein to lead — more at agent.

I don't think I've ever seen an enslaved political representative walking children to school, though it could explain some of their hypocrisy. They were enslaved an tired of walking with children.

Yes, I've certainly felt that way, at times; because, as of this writing, there is yet another all-cap thread title in the PPR index. I feel that when a precedent is set, it should be applied to ALL.

And, C, that maybe she DID protect herself, and the protection failed (ie, there IS such a thing as a "Pill Baby" [when a woman becomes pregnant while on the Pill]).

Then she knowingly took the risk and it didn't work out for her. Murdering an innocent human life is not a valid solution. Carry the child to term and put it up for adoption.

Our everyday prudes, pedants, and pundits, are enslaved, political, representatives.

Pedagogy also carries the connotation of the false color of authority, because the person outwardly presents as an authoritarian, yet is ultimately subordinate to the prevailing, political order.



Social conservatives weren't complaining, when the erastes had social influence.

Or, when the govt is the premier trafficker in vices.

It's a sumptuary law -- not a moral argument. There is a market control, on it, irrespective of the moral considerations.

That is what I found hypocritical.

Q -- How did you get the job
A -- It's who you know, who you bl--

Gym coaches, talent agents, and king makers take the vulgar saying literally, while making the worse possible accusations, against low-status people, who they find suspicious.

I think that conservatives are enablers of the rich. They feel powerful, but are ultimately, just slaves and gatekeepers, trafficking in the same vices they claim to be at war against.

As previously discussed in numerous other posts, no, she didn't always knowingly take a risk, or even have a choice in taking that risk. And carrying the child to term is not always an option. And we can't even adopt out all the kids currently in the system.


Examples please. I could come up with names of people I think represent the extreme right, but I've yet to see anybody take a political representative or their first born to sell at an open market.


Relevance?


Examples please.



Examples please.


Examples please.

Wealthy people are gladly afforded access to drugs, guns, dirty fuels, and sexualized children -- everything which is considered a vice, in modern times.



It's a generalization. Determine, for yourself, whether it is relevant.

The middle class are pedagogues and gatekeepers, who only pretend to be in authority.

So are poor people and middle class people.


Very well. I have determined the generalization to be irrelevant.

(For yourself.)

You're not trying very hard, to believe that conservatives are hypocrites.