Page 3 of 5 [ 73 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

Mikah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Oct 2015
Age: 37
Posts: 3,201
Location: England

29 Mar 2018, 4:25 pm

DarthMetaKnight wrote:
When did human ancestors acquire souls?

Don't know.
DarthMetaKnight wrote:
When does a developing fetus acquire a soul?

Hmm... don't know.
DarthMetaKnight wrote:
Do people with severe brain damage still have souls ... or does the soul exit the body before the body is technically dead?

I ... don't know.
DarthMetaKnight wrote:
Would it be possible for future generations to create a machine with a soul?

...Don't know
DarthMetaKnight wrote:
Do aliens have souls?

This one I definitely ... don't know.


_________________
Behold! we are not bound for ever to the circles of the world, and beyond them is more than memory, Farewell!


Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 26,635
Location: Australia

29 Mar 2018, 4:41 pm

Mikah wrote:
DarthMetaKnight wrote:
When did human ancestors acquire souls?

Don't know.
DarthMetaKnight wrote:
When does a developing fetus acquire a soul?

Hmm... don't know.
DarthMetaKnight wrote:
Do people with severe brain damage still have souls ... or does the soul exit the body before the body is technically dead?

I ... don't know.
DarthMetaKnight wrote:
Would it be possible for future generations to create a machine with a soul?

...Don't know
DarthMetaKnight wrote:
Do aliens have souls?

This one I definitely ... don't know.


Damn!
You are one ignorant bastard!... :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:



Mikah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Oct 2015
Age: 37
Posts: 3,201
Location: England

29 Mar 2018, 4:58 pm

Pepe wrote:
Damn!
You are one ignorant bastard!... :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:


I'll let this one slide, mainly because DarthMetaKnight just made a thread linking gun crime to lack of socialist policies. Let us don our capes and fly, our presence is required elsewhere.


_________________
Behold! we are not bound for ever to the circles of the world, and beyond them is more than memory, Farewell!


Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 26,635
Location: Australia

29 Mar 2018, 5:38 pm

Mikah wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Damn!
You are one ignorant bastard!... :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:


I'll let this one slide, mainly because DarthMetaKnight just made a thread linking gun crime to lack of socialist policies. Let us don our capes and fly, our presence is required elsewhere.


Agreed!
"The enemy of my enemy is my friend"!...
"Let us fly, my pretties!"<cackle>...
Time to slay the epitome of left wing evil! :twisted:



SabbraCadabra
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Apr 2008
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,797
Location: Michigan

29 Mar 2018, 5:53 pm

Spiderpig wrote:
I’m sure you’re well aware that a human being doesn’t just keep removing more and more water from the environment, but on average releases as much water as they drink back to the environment in a few well-known ways. Therefore, simply having a certain population of humans drinking will never cause the Earth to run out of water.

That's what I was getting at ;)

Quote:
On the other hand, if the human population were to grow boundlessly, the amount of water sequestered in human bodies would steadily increase and eventually there would be no more water left in the environment, even though the growth would probably be halted much sooner than that by other problems.

Right. I can't imagine that being possible without the planet being overpopulated to an extent that the ice caps all melt and flood us.

Even if it were physically possible to drink all of the water, eventually it will all go back into the water cycle, one way or another.

Although IIRC, they were saying that minute amounts of H2O were evaporating into space through the hole in the ozone layer.

Quote:
Similarly, in your scenario, each human sequesters one spirit from the environment for their whole life. If the number of living humans grows without bounds and there’s only a finite number of spirits, eventually there should be no spirits left. I specifically asked what would happen then.

We don't know if they are finite, and we don't know if souls:bodies work on a 1:1 basis. We also have to imagine that there is other life in the universe.

I can only imagine what would happen, and I'm sure it wouldn't be good. Overpopulation is never without consequence.

I heard an interesting theory once, that spirits are not singular things, but more of a fluid-like energy. In essence, some people would have more of this energy than others, and it would all flow to and from a source, like a large pool, which would be God. It kind of creeps me out to think that we're all just God drones, unknowingly interacting with each other for some strange form of entertainment, but it's still interesting to me.

Quote:
Being autistic and all that, I only very slowly learned this kind of obstacles usually mean the other person doesn’t want to debate the issue at hand and is more interested in getting me to shut up and leave them alone.

Nah, I honestly wasn't sure what you were getting at. I'm fine with the occasional debate, as long as it's not with trolls.


_________________
I'll brave the storm to come, for it surely looks like rain...


techstepgenr8tion
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2005
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 24,576
Location: 28th Path of Tzaddi

31 Mar 2018, 3:20 pm

A nice little episode a particular Youtube magician went through last year reintegrating fragments and the difference between that work vs working with independent deities. Very interesting stuff:


_________________
The loneliest part of life: it's not just that no one is on your cloud, few can even see your cloud.


Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 26,635
Location: Australia

31 Mar 2018, 5:50 pm

SabbraCadabra wrote:
Quote:
Similarly, in your scenario, each human sequesters one spirit from the environment for their whole life. If the number of living humans grows without bounds and there’s only a finite number of spirits, eventually there should be no spirits left. I specifically asked what would happen then.

We don't know if they are finite, and we don't know if souls:bodies work on a 1:1 basis. We also have to imagine that there is other life in the universe.

I can only imagine what would happen, and I'm sure it wouldn't be good. Overpopulation is never without consequence.

I heard an interesting theory once, that spirits are not singular things, but more of a fluid-like energy. In essence, some people would have more of this energy than others, and it would all flow to and from a source, like a large pool, which would be God. It kind of creeps me out to think that we're all just God drones, unknowingly interacting with each other for some strange form of entertainment, but it's still interesting to me.


The idea of "souls" is a manifestation of creativity on steroids, imo...
Occam's Razor would suggest there is no such thing... 8)

techstepgenr8tion wrote:
A nice little episode a particular Youtube magician went through last year reintegrating fragments and the difference between that work vs working with independent deities. Very interesting stuff:



Copy the link in addition to the youtube insertion... :wink:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OzrZacDp9fM&t=2s



techstepgenr8tion
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2005
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 24,576
Location: 28th Path of Tzaddi

31 Mar 2018, 9:51 pm

That's odd - I actually see the video.

Then again I suppose it'll only matter if anyone watches it, which I have my doubts.


_________________
The loneliest part of life: it's not just that no one is on your cloud, few can even see your cloud.


Lintar
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Nov 2012
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,777
Location: Victoria, Australia

05 Apr 2018, 9:44 pm

The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Souls don't exist in science.


So if something cannot be determined via "science" then it cannot possibly exist. Is that what you are suggesting here? Science (or, more accurately, the scientific method) was only ever introduced in order for us to uncover facts about phenomena that the method itself was specifically designed to tackle: i.e. material phenomena. It has an inherent philosophical bias built into it (i.e. the philosophical doctrine of materialism), because it is used to measure, record and assess that which is amenable to such an approach.

The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
The very concept of souls was something humans invented because the brain's function was unknown, the concept of the souls in the ancient times was like the 'driver and consciousness' of the body ; they imagined that the body is like a vehicle and the soul is its embedded driver, that's the why the concept of undead and zombies in ancient times was 'soulless bodies moved by necromancy'.


Even IF this is true, so what? This in no way diminishes the concept itself, which is valid regardless of why people believe what they do about it, or how it came about.

The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Science proved that mind, consciousness and the ability to send commands to body movements are ALL part of the brain.


Actually, no, it hasn't. By the way, there is no such thing as "proof" in science, only evidence.

The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Sever brain damages are the biggest proof that souls don't exist.


What about those (admittedly rare) instances where someone is born with hardly a brain at all and yet retains most cognitive functions? Whoever said that what the brain (in your view) does is what a soul even is anyway? I tend to think of it as being equivalent to the life force, which is what animates us and without which we would be soulless zombies.



Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 26,635
Location: Australia

12 Apr 2018, 6:42 pm

Lintar wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Souls don't exist in science.


So if something cannot be determined via "science" then it cannot possibly exist.


*Reason* suggests souls don't exist...

What is your definition of a "soul"?



Mikah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Oct 2015
Age: 37
Posts: 3,201
Location: England

12 Apr 2018, 6:50 pm

Pepe wrote:
What is your definition of a "soul"?


The part of us that lives on once our time here is done.


_________________
Behold! we are not bound for ever to the circles of the world, and beyond them is more than memory, Farewell!


techstepgenr8tion
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2005
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 24,576
Location: 28th Path of Tzaddi

12 Apr 2018, 7:46 pm

A potentially more grating picture seems to emerge for me:

Eternity without ultimate purpose.

The only sweetener perhaps being the company of Adam Kadmon (ie. the Jesus of NDE's) and Isis/Mary/Sophia/Shekinah/Elohim.

I often wonder, with respect to Yechidah/Atman, what It's religious beliefs are or would be. By all intents and purposes people would call it 'God' but conscious superstructure might perhaps be a better assessment. Maybe, by some sheer fluke of luck, it zapped into being built in such a way that it never had the capacity to sorrow over such questions.


_________________
The loneliest part of life: it's not just that no one is on your cloud, few can even see your cloud.


Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 26,635
Location: Australia

13 Apr 2018, 1:55 pm

Mikah wrote:
Pepe wrote:
What is your definition of a "soul"?


The part of us that lives on once our time here is done.


Like a parasite?
Seriously, what is it good for?



Mikah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Oct 2015
Age: 37
Posts: 3,201
Location: England

13 Apr 2018, 2:19 pm

Pepe wrote:
Mikah wrote:
Pepe wrote:
What is your definition of a "soul"?


The part of us that lives on once our time here is done.


Like a parasite?
Seriously, what is it good for?


It's more like a necessity for the traditional Judeo-monotheisms. We know our bodies don't transform into light and zap into the heavens, we leave them behind, therefore, for an afterlife (and Judgement) to exist, a part of us not seen or totally understood must make the journey there.


_________________
Behold! we are not bound for ever to the circles of the world, and beyond them is more than memory, Farewell!


Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 26,635
Location: Australia

13 Apr 2018, 2:45 pm

Mikah wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Mikah wrote:
Pepe wrote:
What is your definition of a "soul"?


The part of us that lives on once our time here is done.


Like a parasite?
Seriously, what is it good for?


It's more like a necessity for the traditional Judeo-monotheisms. We know our bodies don't transform into light and zap into the heavens, we leave them behind, therefore, for an afterlife (and Judgement) to exist, a part of us not seen or totally understood must make the journey there.


Wishful thinking doesn't make it so...
Some people with existential anxiety desperately look for an emotional crutch to satiate their emotional needs to gain emotional stability...

Most people can mature emotionally when confronted with the realities of life...
The problem is, some hold others back from achieving philosophical enlightenment...

Religious beliefs are primarily there for cocooning children from the harsh realities of life...
This naive belief system/mental-context is the metaphorical garden of Eden, and through "eating the fruit" of knowledge/sexual-awareness during puberty/adolescence, that innocence is lost, and the individual is confronted with the brutality of the real world...

Some cope by turning to denial of truth/reality...
This is an evolution inspired phenomenon which helped pre-scientific enlightenment but is an obsolete psychological coping mechanism these days...
But obviously, it is effective for a significant number of people even now...

In a nutshell:
You are living in the past man... :mrgreen:
Errm...
No offence intended... 8O



techstepgenr8tion
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2005
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 24,576
Location: 28th Path of Tzaddi

13 Apr 2018, 3:44 pm

Regardless of what religions need what there's at least at minimum some form of super-psy which takes a hammer to the naive forms of materialism. It strongly suggests that our consciousness is comprised of something that doesn't go away, it doesn't prove that we don't get reabsorbed by a larger environment and cease to exist in terms of losing personal identity but the assumption that it's absolute nonexistence is looking increasingly weaker.


_________________
The loneliest part of life: it's not just that no one is on your cloud, few can even see your cloud.