Page 3 of 3 [ 34 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,160
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

10 Oct 2020, 4:31 pm

MaxE wrote:
KT67 wrote:
I've heard the stereotype that female sexuality is more fluid.

As a man I was once slammed for suggesting that. Anyway, it's possible that straight men often have a culturally-imposed aversion to same-sex intimacy so that only men who are unambivalently gay indulge in it, whereas the same thing simply doesn't affect women very much. I can see other cultural trends that encourage same-sex intimacy for women for reasons of gender solidarity and within feminism there is a tendency to admire lesbians. In addition, many women who would probably otherwise be heterosexual seem to feel sexually threatened by men either due to bad personal experience or knowledge of same on the part of other women. In particular, women who grew up with any sort of disability may have been actively encouraged to have such feelings by parents or caregivers. For a concrete example of this, consider the TV program "Born This Way" in which a woman with Down Syndrome plans to get married so her parents must confess to her they lied about potential ill effects from having sex with a man; as a way to make her safe from predators when she was younger. It should be no surprise that a woman in this situation would find herself in a lesbian relationship even though left on her own might she have preferred male companionship.


My wife considers herself to be bisexual. While she's physically attracted to women, she's more interested in being emotionally intimate with men, or rather, a man (that's me).


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


PhosphorusDecree
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 May 2016
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,630
Location: Yorkshire, UK

11 Oct 2020, 6:57 am

Jiheisho wrote:
PhosphorusDecree wrote:
MaxE wrote:
I wonder if there's some evolutionary advantage to the fact that a consistent percent of the population is gay. If so, then it would have to be considered normal to be gay. Sorry if this is not a direct response to the OP, but it occurred to me when considering the question.


A few years back, there was a short piece in New Scientist about a gene that raised the odds of men being gay.


Largest study to date confirms overlap between autism and gender diversity


Huh. That may explain all the bisexual geeks I run into at science fiction conventions....


_________________
You're so vain
I bet you think this sig is about you