Page 3 of 4 [ 64 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 26,635
Location: Australia

21 Nov 2020, 8:31 pm

Sweetleaf wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Mona Pereth wrote:
Pepe wrote:
I don't really care.
Australia's literal existence may depend on a strong American ally. 8)


Brictoria wrote:
ving the threat aware that America is an ally can be all that is needed to deter the threat from taking action...


That being the case, why on Earth have you guys been in favor of Trump, who has been backing out of international treaties and distancing the U.S. from its allies???


Trump put trade pressure on China*, improved the American economy, brought manufacturing back to America, protected American IP, prohibited ownership of shares in China*s* owned companies(?) in America. Made Nato pay its way, improved the living standards of the coloured people through better wages and increased numbers of jobs, warp speeded the vaccine, but don't say I said that. 8O :mrgreen:

But I am not a Trump fanboy.
If the Democrats keep the pressure on the China*s*, I'd be happy with that too. 8)


What exactly do you mean by China*? China?

Also, he did not bring manufacturing back to America and all his china tariffs did was hurt the farmers and agriculture workers. He's also done everything he can to harm the environment and turn back any policies meant to help protect it. Also not really sure he really improved the standards that much for any of the poor regardless of ethnicity, if anything I have seen more homeless people than ever.


He lowered business tax, and as a result, a major Australian spent a billion dollars in building a company in America, rather than here. Morrison wouldn't have been happy with that. 8O

The lower tax rates would have made a lot of Amerikans invest/relocate in the US, rather than China*, as a result, also. 8)



Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 26,635
Location: Australia

21 Nov 2020, 8:34 pm

GGPViper wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Trump put trade pressure on 中国, improved the 美国 economy, brought manufacturing back to 美国, protected 美国 IP, prohibited ownership of shares in 中国 owned companies(?) in 美国. Made Nato pay its way, improved the living standards of the coloured 人 through better wages and increased numbers of 工作, warp speeded the vaccine, but don't say I said that. 8O :mrgreen:

But I am not a 笨蛋 fanboy.
If the Democrats keep the pressure on the 中国人, I'd be happy with that too. 8)

What pressure?

Image

Source: My own graph based on the following data from the IMF World Economic Outlook:
https://knoema.com/IMFWEO2020Oct/imf-wo ... ober-2020#

The 2020 figure is of course a preliminary estimate - as of October 2020 - but it is in line with the general expectation that the Chinese economy will still achieve net growth in 2020 despite of COVID-19.


What has that got to do with my statement that Trump is putting pressure on China*?
Interesting non-sequitur. 8)



Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 26,635
Location: Australia

21 Nov 2020, 8:40 pm

Sweetleaf wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Sweetleaf wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Mona Pereth wrote:
Pepe wrote:
I don't really care.
Australia's literal existence may depend on a strong American ally. 8)


Brictoria wrote:
ving the threat aware that America is an ally can be all that is needed to deter the threat from taking action...


That being the case, why on Earth have you guys been in favor of Trump, who has been backing out of international treaties and distancing the U.S. from its allies???


Trump put trade pressure on China*, improved the American economy, brought manufacturing back to America, protected American IP, prohibited ownership of shares in China*s* owned companies(?) in America. Made Nato pay its way, improved the living standards of the coloured people through better wages and increased numbers of jobs, warp speeded the vaccine, but don't say I said that. 8O :mrgreen:

But I am not a Trump fanboy.
If the Democrats keep the pressure on the China*s*, I'd be happy with that too. 8)


What exactly do you mean by China*? China?

Also, he did not bring manufacturing back to America and all his china tariffs did was hurt the farmers and agriculture workers. He's also done everything he can to harm the environment and turn back any policies meant to help protect it. Also not really sure he really improved the standards that much for any of the poor regardless of ethnicity, if anything I have seen more homeless people than ever.


So, are you saying everything/k republican is evil and everything/k democrat is angelic? :scratch:


No I would not say that. And I was a pretty reluctant democrat voter, since I think a lot of times the democrats just p**** foot around instead of making a stand and over-all the Democratic party is too centrist for my liking. But I do feel at this point they are the lesser of two evils therefore I vote that way.

I'd rather just have socialism, but that's probably not going to happen anytime soon. People are just too addicted to capitalism currently. I'd even go as far as saying I'd be fine with a cap on individual wealth.


The biggest issue in America is the abomination of the health system, imo.
Your government should look at Canada and Australia to see how is should be done. 8)

Regarding socialism:



Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 26,635
Location: Australia

21 Nov 2020, 8:46 pm

uncommondenominator wrote:
Pepe wrote:
uncommondenominator wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Brictoria wrote:
Sweetleaf wrote:
Pepe wrote:
I don't really care.
Australia's literal existence may depend on a strong American ally. 8)


damn, I sure hope not...we already have enough on our plate, without having to ensure the continuing existence of australia.


Sometimes, having the threat aware that America is an ally can be all that is needed to deter the threat from taking action...


That was the case with the Indonesians, a ways back.
Indonesia was threatening war with Australia.
They backed down 48 hours later when America made it clear they would back us. 8)


Are you referring to this?

https://www.awm.gov.au/articles/event/i ... rly%201963.

If not this, then to what are you referring?


Nope.
I think it was to do with the conflict over East Timor.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australia ... East_Timor


Try again, though at least this one mentions america. Indonesia was invading Timor after Timor's government collapsed when Portugal de-colonized it. Australia and America were both *helping* Indonesia. Indonesia was not threatening to invade Australia. America did not prevent anything. They helped the occupation.

Australia seems pretty proud of the fact that their invasion rate is between zero and one, depending on who's history you go by. Surrounded by reefs and shoals, historically difficult to navigate waters, large sections of coast not conducive to a landing party... Not to mention that if you look at Indonesia and Australia, it doesn't pose much of a threat.

It's pretty wild how some people seem to think they have laser-precise insight into the workings of a foreign nation, but don't even seem to know their own history too well...


I'm sure that was it.
I was literally watching the news about how Indonesia was trying to take over Timor, using rebels, but Australia intervened.

The "interesting" thing was, after Timor gain independence, the Howard government skrewed the Timorese of a large part of the oil rights. Charming. 8O



Brictoria
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Aug 2013
Age: 49
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,998
Location: Melbourne, Australia

21 Nov 2020, 11:10 pm

Pepe wrote:
Sweetleaf wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Sweetleaf wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Mona Pereth wrote:
Pepe wrote:
I don't really care.
Australia's literal existence may depend on a strong American ally. 8)


Brictoria wrote:
ving the threat aware that America is an ally can be all that is needed to deter the threat from taking action...


That being the case, why on Earth have you guys been in favor of Trump, who has been backing out of international treaties and distancing the U.S. from its allies???


Trump put trade pressure on China*, improved the American economy, brought manufacturing back to America, protected American IP, prohibited ownership of shares in China*s* owned companies(?) in America. Made Nato pay its way, improved the living standards of the coloured people through better wages and increased numbers of jobs, warp speeded the vaccine, but don't say I said that. 8O :mrgreen:

But I am not a Trump fanboy.
If the Democrats keep the pressure on the China*s*, I'd be happy with that too. 8)


What exactly do you mean by China*? China?

Also, he did not bring manufacturing back to America and all his china tariffs did was hurt the farmers and agriculture workers. He's also done everything he can to harm the environment and turn back any policies meant to help protect it. Also not really sure he really improved the standards that much for any of the poor regardless of ethnicity, if anything I have seen more homeless people than ever.


So, are you saying everything/k republican is evil and everything/k democrat is angelic? :scratch:


No I would not say that. And I was a pretty reluctant democrat voter, since I think a lot of times the democrats just p**** foot around instead of making a stand and over-all the Democratic party is too centrist for my liking. But I do feel at this point they are the lesser of two evils therefore I vote that way.

I'd rather just have socialism, but that's probably not going to happen anytime soon. People are just too addicted to capitalism currently. I'd even go as far as saying I'd be fine with a cap on individual wealth.


The biggest issue in America is the abomination of the health system, imo.
Your government should look at Canada and Australia to see how is should be done. 8)


If they did that, however, they may find that a lot of things that they like (public hospitals, for example) are actually state, not federal, responsibilities here (not sure how Canada manages their system), whereas they seem to see it as a federal issue over there (this may have a constitutional\legislative background, or simply be a misunderstanding of which level of government is constitutionaly\legislatively responsible, caused by seeing other countries systems and assuming they are federal systems there, so would automatically have to be the same in the U.S.A.):
Quote:
State, territory and local government responsibilities

managing and administering public hospitals
delivering preventive services such as breast cancer screening and immunisation programs
funding and managing community and mental health services
public dental clinics
ambulance and emergency services
patient transport and subsidy schemes
food safety and handling regulation
regulating, inspecting, licensing and monitoring health premises

Source: https://www.health.gov.au/about-us/the-australian-health-system

An additional benefit of pushing for state, rather than federal, implementation of public hospitals, ambulances, etc. is that it is something that can be organised and implemented in a much faster, more targetted way, as those who would be implementing this would have better knowledge of the areas where facilities were required. It could also be partially funded through charges (much like the current private system) for patients from outside the state, lowering the tax requirements on the individual state's residents, with agreements between states where it was implemented not to charge each other's residents for the service, which may encourage the states that hold out from implementing it to have their citizens demand it for their state as well.

Alternatively, there is likely nothing to prevent the states from setting their own "health-care"\"health insurance" system up, where the state covers some, or all, of the costs of given procedures for all residents of the state (within their state, and by agreement, in other states as well) through an increase in state taxes, rather than having to go to the expence of building their own facilities which will compete with the existing private facilities\services.

Certainly, an implementation of our federal PBS and MBS would be beneficial to them (and are federal areas of responsibility, at least over here.), but the laws and constitution there may not allow\need large changes to permit this, both as it would entail costs (and so taxes to cover) and may entail issues related to setting prices and the restrictions placed on businesses as a result.

With that said, things like having aged-care services regulated by the federal, rather than state, governments may have saved many thousands of lives in the U.S.A. during the current pandemic, had they replicated that portion of our system, given certain states were requiring those who had tested positive to be returned to the aged-care locations, allowing the disease to spread through the known vulnerable population there, rather than taking a responsible approach and keeping them isolated thereby protecting those other residents.



Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,157
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

21 Nov 2020, 11:12 pm

Pepe wrote:
Sweetleaf wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Sweetleaf wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Mona Pereth wrote:
Pepe wrote:
I don't really care.
Australia's literal existence may depend on a strong American ally. 8)


Brictoria wrote:
ving the threat aware that America is an ally can be all that is needed to deter the threat from taking action...


That being the case, why on Earth have you guys been in favor of Trump, who has been backing out of international treaties and distancing the U.S. from its allies???


Trump put trade pressure on China*, improved the American economy, brought manufacturing back to America, protected American IP, prohibited ownership of shares in China*s* owned companies(?) in America. Made Nato pay its way, improved the living standards of the coloured people through better wages and increased numbers of jobs, warp speeded the vaccine, but don't say I said that. 8O :mrgreen:

But I am not a Trump fanboy.
If the Democrats keep the pressure on the China*s*, I'd be happy with that too. 8)


What exactly do you mean by China*? China?

Also, he did not bring manufacturing back to America and all his china tariffs did was hurt the farmers and agriculture workers. He's also done everything he can to harm the environment and turn back any policies meant to help protect it. Also not really sure he really improved the standards that much for any of the poor regardless of ethnicity, if anything I have seen more homeless people than ever.


So, are you saying everything/k republican is evil and everything/k democrat is angelic? :scratch:


No I would not say that. And I was a pretty reluctant democrat voter, since I think a lot of times the democrats just p**** foot around instead of making a stand and over-all the Democratic party is too centrist for my liking. But I do feel at this point they are the lesser of two evils therefore I vote that way.

I'd rather just have socialism, but that's probably not going to happen anytime soon. People are just too addicted to capitalism currently. I'd even go as far as saying I'd be fine with a cap on individual wealth.


The biggest issue in America is the abomination of the health system, imo.
Your government should look at Canada and Australia to see how is should be done. 8)

Regarding socialism:



I will watch it a little later, but quite sure it will not sway me. And yeah our healthcare system is crap, that needs to be fixed.


_________________
Metal never dies. \m/


Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 26,635
Location: Australia

22 Nov 2020, 2:35 am

Sweetleaf wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Sweetleaf wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Sweetleaf wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Mona Pereth wrote:
Pepe wrote:
I don't really care.
Australia's literal existence may depend on a strong American ally. 8)


Brictoria wrote:
ving the threat aware that America is an ally can be all that is needed to deter the threat from taking action...


That being the case, why on Earth have you guys been in favor of Trump, who has been backing out of international treaties and distancing the U.S. from its allies???


Trump put trade pressure on China*, improved the American economy, brought manufacturing back to America, protected American IP, prohibited ownership of shares in China*s* owned companies(?) in America. Made Nato pay its way, improved the living standards of the coloured people through better wages and increased numbers of jobs, warp speeded the vaccine, but don't say I said that. 8O :mrgreen:

But I am not a Trump fanboy.
If the Democrats keep the pressure on the China*s*, I'd be happy with that too. 8)


What exactly do you mean by China*? China?

Also, he did not bring manufacturing back to America and all his china tariffs did was hurt the farmers and agriculture workers. He's also done everything he can to harm the environment and turn back any policies meant to help protect it. Also not really sure he really improved the standards that much for any of the poor regardless of ethnicity, if anything I have seen more homeless people than ever.


So, are you saying everything/k republican is evil and everything/k democrat is angelic? :scratch:


No I would not say that. And I was a pretty reluctant democrat voter, since I think a lot of times the democrats just p**** foot around instead of making a stand and over-all the Democratic party is too centrist for my liking. But I do feel at this point they are the lesser of two evils therefore I vote that way.

I'd rather just have socialism, but that's probably not going to happen anytime soon. People are just too addicted to capitalism currently. I'd even go as far as saying I'd be fine with a cap on individual wealth.


The biggest issue in America is the abomination of the health system, imo.
Your government should look at Canada and Australia to see how is should be done. 8)

Regarding socialism:



I will watch it a little later, but quite sure it will not sway me. And yeah our healthcare system is crap, that needs to be fixed.


It is 12 seconds long. :mrgreen:



ElabR8Aspie
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

Joined: 9 Apr 2017
Gender: Male
Posts: 448
Location: Universe

22 Nov 2020, 2:54 am

.Question is it pertinent to remain in the loop?

What does it,and keep you in the loop of suffering and questioning.

Without answer.



Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,157
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

22 Nov 2020, 3:12 am

Pepe wrote:
Sweetleaf wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Sweetleaf wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Sweetleaf wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Mona Pereth wrote:
Pepe wrote:
I don't really care.
Australia's literal existence may depend on a strong American ally. 8)


Brictoria wrote:
ving the threat aware that America is an ally can be all that is needed to deter the threat from taking action...


That being the case, why on Earth have you guys been in favor of Trump, who has been backing out of international treaties and distancing the U.S. from its allies???


Trump put trade pressure on China*, improved the American economy, brought manufacturing back to America, protected American IP, prohibited ownership of shares in China*s* owned companies(?) in America. Made Nato pay its way, improved the living standards of the coloured people through better wages and increased numbers of jobs, warp speeded the vaccine, but don't say I said that. 8O :mrgreen:

But I am not a Trump fanboy.
If the Democrats keep the pressure on the China*s*, I'd be happy with that too. 8)


What exactly do you mean by China*? China?

Also, he did not bring manufacturing back to America and all his china tariffs did was hurt the farmers and agriculture workers. He's also done everything he can to harm the environment and turn back any policies meant to help protect it. Also not really sure he really improved the standards that much for any of the poor regardless of ethnicity, if anything I have seen more homeless people than ever.


So, are you saying everything/k republican is evil and everything/k democrat is angelic? :scratch:


No I would not say that. And I was a pretty reluctant democrat voter, since I think a lot of times the democrats just p**** foot around instead of making a stand and over-all the Democratic party is too centrist for my liking. But I do feel at this point they are the lesser of two evils therefore I vote that way.

I'd rather just have socialism, but that's probably not going to happen anytime soon. People are just too addicted to capitalism currently. I'd even go as far as saying I'd be fine with a cap on individual wealth.


The biggest issue in America is the abomination of the health system, imo.
Your government should look at Canada and Australia to see how is should be done. 8)

Regarding socialism:



I will watch it a little later, but quite sure it will not sway me. And yeah our healthcare system is crap, that needs to be fixed.


It is 12 seconds long. :mrgreen:


Well I was busy earlier, with them miniatures only a real man can paint lol. watched it now and also that's the oldest argument ever and I don't buy it. And it shouldn't be 'everyone elses money' its if you live in a society you should contribute to said society. So there should be a cap on wealth, so a person can only earn so much which leaves more for the rest of us because their over-flow would go to the state and than that could be used to help people. No one needs to be a multi-billionaire its not necessary and if anything it is harmful to have a single person ever controlling that much wealth. Like human beings are the worst, so can one be trusted with so much wealth?


_________________
Metal never dies. \m/


Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 26,635
Location: Australia

22 Nov 2020, 3:55 am

Sweetleaf wrote:
And it shouldn't be 'everyone elses money' its if you live in a society you should contribute to said society. So there should be a cap on wealth, so a person can only earn so much which leaves more for the rest of us because their over-flow would go to the state and than that could be used to help people. No one needs to be a multi-billionaire its not necessary and if anything it is harmful to have a single person ever controlling that much wealth. Like human beings are the worst, so can one be trusted with so much wealth?


Stalin, Putin, Jijinping, Kim Jong-un, Bloomberg, Clinton, Biden. All filthy rich.
Where is the egalitarianism there?
Hypocrisy Trumps wins. 8)



Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,157
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

22 Nov 2020, 4:28 am

Pepe wrote:
Sweetleaf wrote:
And it shouldn't be 'everyone elses money' its if you live in a society you should contribute to said society. So there should be a cap on wealth, so a person can only earn so much which leaves more for the rest of us because their over-flow would go to the state and than that could be used to help people. No one needs to be a multi-billionaire its not necessary and if anything it is harmful to have a single person ever controlling that much wealth. Like human beings are the worst, so can one be trusted with so much wealth?


Stalin, Putin, Jijinping, Kim Jong-un, Bloomberg, Clinton, Biden. All filthy rich.
Where is the egalitarianism there?
Hypocrisy Trumps wins. 8)


What? none of those guys were/are socialists...f**k em all except Biden, he's ok a little centrist for sure but for sure influenceable, to be pushed further left.

And no Trump does not win no matter how hard his loyalists and bootlickers wave their trump flags in front of the grocery store. That is what I saw today and my boyfriend gave them a thumbs down while I gave them the rude american middle finger gesture.


_________________
Metal never dies. \m/


Last edited by Sweetleaf on 22 Nov 2020, 4:39 am, edited 2 times in total.

Brictoria
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Aug 2013
Age: 49
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,998
Location: Melbourne, Australia

22 Nov 2020, 4:32 am

Pepe wrote:
Sweetleaf wrote:
And it shouldn't be 'everyone elses money' its if you live in a society you should contribute to said society. So there should be a cap on wealth, so a person can only earn so much which leaves more for the rest of us because their over-flow would go to the state and than that could be used to help people. No one needs to be a multi-billionaire its not necessary and if anything it is harmful to have a single person ever controlling that much wealth. Like human beings are the worst, so can one be trusted with so much wealth?


Stalin, Putin, Jijinping, Kim Jong-un, Bloomberg, Clinton, Biden. All filthy rich.
Where is the egalitarianism there?
Hypocrisy Trumps wins. 8)

I believe you missed Bezos, Zuckerberg, and Dorsey as well (among many others in their field).



The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 43
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,459
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

22 Nov 2020, 6:52 am

I think US, UK, Australia and New Zealand should become one nation; as meant to be. Hawaï which was totally culturally different yet joined the US, why the UK and OZ can’t?



KT67
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2019
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,807

22 Nov 2020, 7:04 am

The problem with capitalism is eventually you run out of other people's labour...


_________________
Not actually a girl
He/him


roronoa79
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Jan 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,420
Location: Indiana

22 Nov 2020, 7:09 am

I always imagined it to be sort of tiring to have to keep up with US politics on top of your own country's politics. The US has its nose in everyone's business so if we screw up, it affects everyone. I'm always embarrassed knowing how much attention our politicians get around the world :( . I try to keep up with world politics to some extent, but I feel most of my countrymen don't give much mind to international politics unless it affects the US. And as we become more isolationist, I worry we'll only become more ignorant of the outside world as a whole.
Hopefully once Trump is kicked out things will start to improve. If Trump was benefitting anybody abroad, it was just a side-effect of his being cutthroat in pursuing America's interests before anyone else's, and his own interests before anyone else's. People like Putin and Xi will be saddened to not have such a pliable moron as Trump in charge anymore. Biden is still not much of an improvement, but, my god, it's something at least.


_________________
Diagnoses: AS, Depression, General & Social Anxiety
I guess I just wasn't made for these times.
- Brian Wilson

Δυνατὰ δὲ οἱ προύχοντες πράσσουσι καὶ οἱ ἀσθενεῖς ξυγχωροῦσιν.
Those with power do what their power permits, and the weak can only acquiesce.

- Thucydides

Conservatism discourages thought, discussion, consensus, empathy, and hope.


holymackerel
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 30 Aug 2020
Gender: Male
Posts: 271

22 Nov 2020, 7:18 am

Even with Biden. I dont see the US as the go to example everyone has for democracy. It seems like a cruel, money driven, everyones the enemy type society. It wont be long before its self proclaimed rhetoric of being the best country in the world is not just questionable but easily dismissed and people will look to Europe, South Korea, Australia or New Zealand for examples of how governments should do things. Who knows, maybe it has already happened?