Question for Christians on Intelligent Design

Page 3 of 3 [ 45 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

Tempus Fugit
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 20 Oct 2020
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,545

16 Dec 2020, 1:03 pm

AngelRho wrote:
kitesandtrainsandcats wrote:
Tim_Tex wrote:
I think a lot of the Bible is metaphor, not to be taken literally

What is the standard for determining which part is literal and which part is metaphor?
And who created that standard?
And what was their agenda when they created it?

EXCELLENT questions, all of them. The Bible DOES make use of idiomatic language, so when a passage happens to be metaphor it’s usually fairly obvious. It’s a self-interpreting document. I get really nervous when I hear a believer say it’s all or mostly metaphor. If the scriptural basis for our faith has no or little literal basis, what objective basis do we even have for faith? I’m not sure I’d be a Christian if that were the case.

Just my opinion here, but if God is strictly limited to natural existence and cannot exhibit supernatural power, he’s not a god I’d be all that concerned with pleasing. Certainly not worth dying for. Christ crucified on a metaphor doesn’t carry quite the same strength as He literally died and was resurrected to save us from the eternal consequences of sin.


I believe what's required is an understanding of the language of the old testament, which is something that probably got passed down by teachers through the generations. A lot of the idiomatic language used in the new testament reflects back to the writings of the old testament prophets. So one has to be versed in what's called hermeneutics to get a better grasp of what's what. Or at least refer to those who are and how they interpret passages of scripture.



kitesandtrainsandcats
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2016
Age: 63
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,968
Location: Missouri

16 Dec 2020, 1:28 pm

envirozentinel wrote:
If we're indeed made "in his image" why does he seem to think so vastly differently from us?
Because God's mind is infinite compared to our finite minds & God's mind has the attributes of being infinitely pure and infinitely holy while our minds as well as being finite are contaminated by the poison of sin.

envirozentinel wrote:
Especially in the Old Testament. For instance, contradictory statements "do not kill" against injunctions to "mercifully" kill all the men, women, kids, animals etc in some places. And that's just a start.


Actually, in the commandment murder is the more accurate modern English word than kill, https://biblehub.com/exodus/20-13.htm
See also the commentary at bottom of the page.
And Jesus is understood to have understood the commandment as referring to murder, https://biblehub.com/matthew/5-21.htm

Contamination fits in there too.
And that killing of all life in a place is a result of a thing in Genesis that some people reject because of reasons such as "it just sounds too science-fictiony".

The basis is in Genesis 3 after the fall in to sin in the Garden of Eden.
Where God says,
Quote:
14 The LORD God said to the serpent, "Because you have done this, Cursed are you more than all cattle, And more than every beast of the field; On your belly you will go, And dust you will eat All the days of your life;
15 And I will put enmity Between you and the woman, And between your seed and her seed; He shall bruise (some translations use crush) you on the head, And you shall bruise (some translations use strike) him on the heel."


That in Genesis 3 verse 15 is seen as a forecast of the birth, crucifixion, death, and resurrection, of Jesus.
With the serpent/Satan will "strike his heel" being seen as referring to Jesus' death and burial.
And the "he will crush your head" referring to Jesus' victory over death via the resurrection & referring to Jesus' eventual judgement of the serpent/Satan and consignment of that being to the eternal lake of fire.
Here is a commentary on that, https://www.bibleref.com/Genesis/3/Genesis-3-15.html

While the coming of Jesus which is celebrated at the soon to arrive Christmas is his appearance in which he offers salvation and redemption to all who will accept and believe, he will eventually return to judge Satan and the world and me and everyone else. He several times in his first appearance in this world made either direct or indirect reference to that dual function,
https://bible.knowing-jesus.com/John/5/30
https://biblehub.com/john/9-39.htm

There is belief which goes from the Genesis 3 point to say that since as a result of God's declaration there Satan knew that eventually an offspring of the woman would bring redemption to humanity it was in Satan's best interest to corrupt the genetics of humans enough to render that birth of a redeemer not possible.

The next step in that effort is seen as Genesis 6 referring to fallen angels corrupting the genetics of humanity via impregnating human women who then had not fully human offspring & also the genetic corruption of all other forms of life.

Genesis 6 is taken as referring to that, just before the account of Noah and the flood, where this explains why the flood;
Quote:
1 Now when men began to multiply on the face of the earth and daughters were born to them,
2the sons of God saw that the daughters of men were beautiful, and they took as wives whomever they chose.
3 So the LORD said, “My Spirit will not contend with man forever,a for he is mortal; his days shall be 120 years.”
4The Nephilim were on the earth in those days—and afterward as well—when the sons of God had relations with the daughters of men. And they bore them children who became the mighty men of old, men of renown.


And in the New Testament there is, in at least Matthew, a quote of Jesus which is taken as him referring to that situation being factually true,
Quote:
36 No one knows about that day or hour, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son,g but only the Father. 37 As it was in the days of Noah, so will it be at the coming of the Son of Man. 38 For in the days before the flood, people were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, up to the day Noah entered the ark. 39 And they were oblivious, until the flood came and swept them all away. So will it be at the coming of the Son of Man.


Now, where the Genesis 6 material says, "4The Nephilim were on the earth in those days—and afterward as well—"
That is taken as literally referring to the taken as literal giants referred to by the spies sent in to the promised land by Moses and Joshua at the end of the Exodus period,
From Numbers 13, I'll leave out the list of names,

Quote:
13 The Lord said to Moses, 2 “Send men to explore Canaan, which I’m giving to the Israelites. Send one leader from each of their ancestors’ tribes.”
3 So at the Lord’s command, Moses sent these men from the Desert of Paran. All of them were leaders of the Israelites.
4 These are their names:
...
5 Forty days later, they came back from exploring the land. 26 They came back to Moses, Aaron, and the whole community of Israel at Kadesh in the Desert of Paran. They gave their report and showed them the fruit from the land.

27 This is what they reported to Moses: “We went to the land where you sent us. It really is a land flowing with milk and honey. Here’s some of its fruit. 28 But the people who live there are strong, and the cities have walls and are very large. We even saw the descendants of Anak there. 29 The Amalekites live in the Negev. The Hittites, Jebusites, and Amorites live in the mountain region. And the Canaanites live along the coast of the Mediterranean Sea and all along the Jordan River.”

30 Caleb told the people to be quiet and listen to Moses. Caleb said, “Let’s go now and take possession of the land. We should be more than able to conquer it.”

31 But the men who had gone with him said, “We can’t attack those people! They’re too strong for us!” 32 So they began to spread lies among the Israelites about the land they had explored. They said, “The land we explored is one that devours those who live there. All the people we saw there are very tall. 33 We saw Nephilim there. (The descendants of Anak are Nephilim.) We felt as small as grasshoppers, and that’s how we must have looked to them.”


:arrow: So, because the people who lived in the area and all other life there were the products of the genetic corruption, which was inextricably entangled with un-redeemable spiritual and moral corruption, God gave the order for the Hebrews/Israelites to kill all the corrupted life.

And that they at least once did not follow the order continued to cause trouble for their nation throughout Old Testament times.


_________________
"There are a thousand things that can happen when you go light a rocket engine, and only one of them is good."
Tom Mueller of SpaceX, in Air and Space, Jan. 2011


kitesandtrainsandcats
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2016
Age: 63
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,968
Location: Missouri

16 Dec 2020, 1:32 pm

Udinaas wrote:
God didn't have to make sin inheritable.

I see the inheritance as logically unavoidable.
If Adam and Eve sinned and their bodies and beings were contaminated by sin, then what children were produced from their contaminated sperm and ovum could not be anything other than contaminated by the contaminated genetic and physical material which they originated from.


_________________
"There are a thousand things that can happen when you go light a rocket engine, and only one of them is good."
Tom Mueller of SpaceX, in Air and Space, Jan. 2011


AngelRho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jan 2008
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,366
Location: The Landmass between N.O. and Mobile

16 Dec 2020, 1:35 pm

Tempus Fugit wrote:
AngelRho wrote:
kitesandtrainsandcats wrote:
Tim_Tex wrote:
I think a lot of the Bible is metaphor, not to be taken literally

What is the standard for determining which part is literal and which part is metaphor?
And who created that standard?
And what was their agenda when they created it?

EXCELLENT questions, all of them. The Bible DOES make use of idiomatic language, so when a passage happens to be metaphor it’s usually fairly obvious. It’s a self-interpreting document. I get really nervous when I hear a believer say it’s all or mostly metaphor. If the scriptural basis for our faith has no or little literal basis, what objective basis do we even have for faith? I’m not sure I’d be a Christian if that were the case.

Just my opinion here, but if God is strictly limited to natural existence and cannot exhibit supernatural power, he’s not a god I’d be all that concerned with pleasing. Certainly not worth dying for. Christ crucified on a metaphor doesn’t carry quite the same strength as He literally died and was resurrected to save us from the eternal consequences of sin.


I believe what's required is an understanding of the language of the old testament, which is something that probably got passed down by teachers through the generations. A lot of the idiomatic language used in the new testament reflects back to the writings of the old testament prophets. So one has to be versed in what's called hermeneutics to get a better grasp of what's what. Or at least refer to those who are and how they interpret passages of scripture.

Right. And not many people really like taking the time to do it. I actually enjoy this stuff. And some things are just relevant to the time in which they are written and the meaning gets lost. How on earth, for example, do we go from "don't boil a baby goat in its mother's milk" to "NO CHEESEBURGERS!! !"??? The context of that passage isn't all that helpful either, which leads me to believe it has nothing to do with diet or animal rights. Something more like "Winter is coming" or "I am Groot" or (my personal favorite) "Who is John Galt?"

In the New Testament you have mustard seeds and mountains, which is tied in more with highly colorful and hyperbolic language typical of the culture. It's kinda like how Yiddish jokes are STILL funny. Speaking of Jewish jokes, here's one:

A Jewish man is playing golf on the Sabbath. The angel Gabriel witnesses this and moves in closer to investigate, all the while hiding himself in a tree. Outraged, Gabriel calls out, "Almighty Lord in Heaven, how can you allow such a thing? Here is a man, a Jewish man, playing golf on your holy day! G-d, can you please do something about this?"

Adonai replies, "Indeed, this man is a sinner worthy of the most severe punishment." Gabriel, somewhat mollified, continues watching, eagerly awaiting a mighty display of G-d's power and wrath.

Suddenly, the man tees off on a par 5 and hits a hole in one. It's unbelievable! Gabriel is furious and cries out once more to G-d, "Lord, you are the highest above all earthly gods and kings. There is no one greater, and I am by no means worthy to question your infinite wisdom. But I don't understand. I thought you were about to strike him with the worst imaginable punishment, yet here he is, celebrating a hole in one on the Lord's day!"

G-d smiles at Gabriel and replies, "Yes, my faithful servant. He is celebrating NOW. But think about this: Who is he going to tell?"



AngelRho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jan 2008
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,366
Location: The Landmass between N.O. and Mobile

16 Dec 2020, 1:39 pm

Udinaas wrote:
God didn't have to make sin inheritable. Every theodicy assumes that God has to work within the rules, even though God is supposed to have created the rules.

Not necessarily. And you don't know that sin as inheritable has any possible alternative. It could be the final redemption of mankind can only happen following the present course. God doesn't make mistakes.



kitesandtrainsandcats
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2016
Age: 63
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,968
Location: Missouri

16 Dec 2020, 1:44 pm

AngelRho wrote:
And not many people really like taking the time to do it. I actually enjoy this stuff.

Indeed, this conversation is being enjoyable.
And fulfilling.


_________________
"There are a thousand things that can happen when you go light a rocket engine, and only one of them is good."
Tom Mueller of SpaceX, in Air and Space, Jan. 2011


kitesandtrainsandcats
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2016
Age: 63
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,968
Location: Missouri

16 Dec 2020, 1:52 pm

thinkinginpictures wrote:
A lot of Christians (and other religious people) believe in Intelligent Design.

Thinking back to that specific concept, I'm going to recommend a book to read,

Who Designed the Designer?: A Rediscovered Path to God’s Existence, 2015
by Michael Augros

Text from Amazon;
Quote:
The “New Atheists” are pulling no punches. If the world of nature needs a designer, they ask, then why wouldn't the designer itself need a designer, too? Or if it can exist without any designer behind it, then why can't we just say the same for the universe and wash our hands of a designer altogether?

Interweaving its pursuit of the First Cause with personal stories and humor, this ground-breaking book takes a fresh approach to ultimate questions. While attentive to empirical science, it builds its case not on authoritative pronouncements of experts that readers must take on faith, but instead on a nuanced understanding of universal principles implicit in everyone's experience.

Here is essential reading for all people who care about contemplating God, not exclusively as a best-explanation for the findings of science, but also as the surprising-yet-inevitable implication of our commonsense contact with reality. Augros harnesses such intellects as Plato, Aristotle, and Aquinas, ushering into the light a wealth of powerful inferences that have hitherto received little or no public exposure. The result is an easygoing yet extraordinary journey, beginning from the world as we all encounter it and ending in the divine mind.


_________________
"There are a thousand things that can happen when you go light a rocket engine, and only one of them is good."
Tom Mueller of SpaceX, in Air and Space, Jan. 2011


madbutnotmad
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 20 Nov 2016
Age: 53
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,678
Location: Jersey UK

16 Dec 2020, 2:01 pm

Creationists who subscribe to Abrahamic faiths, may sound the the genetic flaws in our genetics
were given to us as our punishment for breaking God's law, by biting of the forbidden fruit.

In essence, the human race have been sent to our room with a eternal spanking, so as to give us something
to think about while we are there.

Sent to bed without supper and no desert! Naughty Naughty.

If you are a creationist who subscribes to Hinduism or Buddhism, then the universe came into existence because God got bored and decided to create existence, to give himself something to do, giving himself zilion incarnations
so that he could play with himself, acting out all parts of the play from all perspectives, each individual, a different
aspect of God's or the universes entirety.



Udinaas
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Sep 2020
Age: 30
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,270

16 Dec 2020, 2:38 pm

kitesandtrainsandcats wrote:
Udinaas wrote:
God didn't have to make sin inheritable.

I see the inheritance as logically unavoidable.
If Adam and Eve sinned and their bodies and beings were contaminated by sin, then what children were produced from their contaminated sperm and ovum could not be anything other than contaminated by the contaminated genetic and physical material which they originated from.


Sinful behavior does not logically entail a substance that contaminants bodies. That would be a contingent metaphysical law that God did not have to create. You're equivocating by using the word "sin" to refer to both the behavior and the substance that the behavior creates.



kitesandtrainsandcats
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2016
Age: 63
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,968
Location: Missouri

16 Dec 2020, 3:04 pm

Udinaas wrote:
You're equivocating by using the word "sin" to refer to both the behavior and the substance that the behavior creates.

I disagree about equivocating.
And yes, I am referring to both substance and behavior.
Quote:
verb
gerund or present participle: equivocating
use ambiguous language so as to conceal the truth or avoid committing oneself.


I am not being ambiguous, I am saying outright and definitely that the Biblical statement is that sin has affected both the material of this world and the behavior of we who live in it.
And the affected material and the affected behavior are fully intertwined, entangled, enmeshed.
We have a heart/mind/soul/spirit which is affected by sin.
We have bodies which are made of the minerals from a sin-affected planet.
This entire system is saturated with sin in both its material and mental/behavioral parts.
Even the unthinking physical behavior of the merely material world is affected by, even controlled by, sin.

Quote:
Secondly, the environment was cursed through sin. The punishment of Genesis 3:17–18 reveals that man’s sin caused the curse against the ground, resulting in the troublesome thorns and thistles and a change in the way the natural world works (Romans 8:19–22). The ground was cursed not only in the garden of Eden, from which Adam was taken. It was also cursed outside of it throughout the whole earth.


Quote:
When the first people sinned, they sent the good world God made into a tailspin. The Bible says that the world was subjected to futility, which means that brokenness is the default setting. And we see the evidence of this all around us:

The fact that light from the sun puts us at risk of cancer.
That rivers, lakes, and oceans turn chaotic and deadly whenever a storm begins.
That earthquakes level homes and occasionally move entire nations. Droughts, tornadoes, wildfires…

All of this is the result of sin’s presence in the world.

https://www.gospelproject.com/sin-effect-world/

Here, the entangling of the material and the spirit evidenced by the use of "flesh" to refer simultaneously to both material and spiritual, because in our life and be-ing as humans the material and spiritual are both at the same time different and combined in to one.
Quote:
Berean Study Bible

Walking by the Spirit
(Ezekiel 36:16–38; Galatians 5:16–26)

1Therefore, there is now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus.a 2For in Christ Jesus the law of the Spirit of life set youb free from the law of sin and death. 3For what the law was powerless to do in that it was weakened by the flesh, God did by sending His own Son in the likeness of sinful man, as an offering for sin.c He thus condemned sin in the flesh, 4so that the righteous standard of the law might be fulfilled in us, who do not walk according to the flesh but according to the Spirit.

5Those who live according to the flesh set their minds on the things of the flesh; but those who live according to the Spirit set their minds on the things of the Spirit. 6The mind of the flesh is death, but the mind of the Spirit is life and peace, 7because the mind of the flesh is hostile to God: It does not submit to God’s law, nor can it do so. 8Those controlled by the fleshd cannot please God.

9You, however, are controlled not by the flesh, but by the Spirit, if the Spirit of God lives in you. And if anyone does not have the Spirit of Christ, he does not belong to Christ. 10But if Christ is in you, your body is dead because of sin, yet your spirit is alivee because of righteousness. 11And if the Spirit of Him who raised Jesus from the dead is living in you, He who raised Christ Jesus from the deadf will also give life to your mortal bodies through His Spirit, who lives in you.
https://biblehub.com/bsb/romans/8.htm


_________________
"There are a thousand things that can happen when you go light a rocket engine, and only one of them is good."
Tom Mueller of SpaceX, in Air and Space, Jan. 2011


aghogday
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Nov 2010
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,369

16 Dec 2020, 3:18 pm

It Just Doesn't Get More Face Palm Thick And Qualifiable Malignant

Narcissistic Than A Good Cop Jesus Who Always Eternally Forgives

The Enemy Eternally Loving Them Now Turning the Other Cheek

Until

Mr. Hyde Comes

And Says No, If They Don't

Do Good Not Only Will i Slap

Them; i'll Torture Them As 'Left-Hand Goats';

Indeed, Yes, Scape Goat Them For

All Others to See In Advance

Per the Book of Matthew

In Plain View For all to See;

No Different Really Than Suggesting

Someone Will Be Beloved Still if they Shoot

Someone on 5th Avenue By Loyal Minions Yet

You See? That is Not Nearly as Psychopathic As Any

Psychopath or Even 'Third World Banana Republican'

Will Do In Terms of Torturing Humanity forever Now; Oh, How

The Ultimate Bad Cop Jesus and Bad Cop God Fires, One Who

Tortures Forever Any Part Now of Loving the Enemy, Turning

The Other Cheek to Hell; Good Cop, Super Bad Cop Jesus Again....

If We Will Not Learn this Lesson

From 'the Trump Meme', It is No

Wonder Folks

Still Follow

Both Mr. Hyde

And Beyond the Evil that

Jack The Ripper Could Still Ever

Do Now to Another Part of Living Existence....

It's True, There is the Intelligence of Standard IQ

Book Smart, Bible Smart, in Science And Fiction

Black And White Talk; And then there is the

Intelligence of Love That Never Fears

Criticism And only Finds

Disgrace in

Worship for what

in the World Are ya Gonna

Do to someone Who already is Incarnate All of Love Agape...

'That God' Partially Exists; Yes, in Some Parts of the Bible

Yet is Clear that the Other Parts Are Appropriated by

Malignant Personality Types, Never Tasting the Nirvana of

Love Free to Give and Share; No Use, Trying to get 'them' to

See through

An Opaque

Window of

Love Until they

Naturally Breathe

Altruistic Love and

See How Totally Unintelligent

Is the IQ of Love Out of Integrity; the Book, the Old Bible is As Whole;

Yet true, It does much to bring into View Difficulties With Personality

Disorders, Humans Do Tend to Have, in respect to Empathy and Forgiveness Same...

Yeah, More

Compassion

Than Torturing

Any Part of Life

Forever Now; only

A Person Now

Without Empathy,

Could Dream Up A Book

Like that Unless they were

Just writing Another Horror Story to make Bucks...

And It works as Some Folks get a thrill by telling

Someone else they are gonna be tortured forever

to fulfill some 'Little Man And or Woman Syndrome'

Never 'Big' 'Enough'

Just to Live

And Let

Live

And Breathe

Free as a Mouse

Has More Love than

that Non-Sense for Real;

'Mice or Men' As 'They' Bring...

Heaven Or Hell Real To See And Do...


_________________
KATiE MiA FredericK!iI

Gravatar is one of the coolest things ever!! !

http://en.gravatar.com/katiemiafrederick


AngelRho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jan 2008
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,366
Location: The Landmass between N.O. and Mobile

16 Dec 2020, 3:40 pm

kitesandtrainsandcats wrote:
Udinaas wrote:
You're equivocating by using the word "sin" to refer to both the behavior and the substance that the behavior creates.

I disagree about equivocating.
And yes, I am referring to both substance and behavior.
Quote:
verb
gerund or present participle: equivocating
use ambiguous language so as to conceal the truth or avoid committing oneself.


I am not being ambiguous, I am saying outright and definitely that the Biblical statement is that sin has affected both the material of this world and the behavior of we who live in it.
And the affected material and the affected behavior are fully intertwined, entangled, enmeshed.
We have a heart/mind/soul/spirit which is affected by sin.
We have bodies which are made of the minerals from a sin-affected planet.
This entire system is saturated with sin in both its material and mental/behavioral parts.
Even the unthinking physical behavior of the merely material world is affected by, even controlled by, sin.

Quote:
Secondly, the environment was cursed through sin. The punishment of Genesis 3:17–18 reveals that man’s sin caused the curse against the ground, resulting in the troublesome thorns and thistles and a change in the way the natural world works (Romans 8:19–22). The ground was cursed not only in the garden of Eden, from which Adam was taken. It was also cursed outside of it throughout the whole earth.


Quote:
When the first people sinned, they sent the good world God made into a tailspin. The Bible says that the world was subjected to futility, which means that brokenness is the default setting. And we see the evidence of this all around us:

The fact that light from the sun puts us at risk of cancer.
That rivers, lakes, and oceans turn chaotic and deadly whenever a storm begins.
That earthquakes level homes and occasionally move entire nations. Droughts, tornadoes, wildfires…

All of this is the result of sin’s presence in the world.

https://www.gospelproject.com/sin-effect-world/

Here, the entangling of the material and the spirit evidenced by the use of "flesh" to refer simultaneously to both material and spiritual, because in our life and be-ing as humans the material and spiritual are both at the same time different and combined in to one.
Quote:
Berean Study Bible

Walking by the Spirit
(Ezekiel 36:16–38; Galatians 5:16–26)

1Therefore, there is now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus.a 2For in Christ Jesus the law of the Spirit of life set youb free from the law of sin and death. 3For what the law was powerless to do in that it was weakened by the flesh, God did by sending His own Son in the likeness of sinful man, as an offering for sin.c He thus condemned sin in the flesh, 4so that the righteous standard of the law might be fulfilled in us, who do not walk according to the flesh but according to the Spirit.

5Those who live according to the flesh set their minds on the things of the flesh; but those who live according to the Spirit set their minds on the things of the Spirit. 6The mind of the flesh is death, but the mind of the Spirit is life and peace, 7because the mind of the flesh is hostile to God: It does not submit to God’s law, nor can it do so. 8Those controlled by the fleshd cannot please God.

9You, however, are controlled not by the flesh, but by the Spirit, if the Spirit of God lives in you. And if anyone does not have the Spirit of Christ, he does not belong to Christ. 10But if Christ is in you, your body is dead because of sin, yet your spirit is alivee because of righteousness. 11And if the Spirit of Him who raised Jesus from the dead is living in you, He who raised Christ Jesus from the deadf will also give life to your mortal bodies through His Spirit, who lives in you.
https://biblehub.com/bsb/romans/8.htm

Wait, is that really a Gospel Project link??? Friend, you need to get away from LifeWay and get you some Jesus! 8O

Am half kidding, of course, but LifeWay has been steady going down a very bad path over the last few years. Their literature isn’t all bad. Their approach to worship leadership and music over the last few years has been...sad. They’re selling off assets left and right BEFORE the pandemic and abandoned all the stuff that was really working best in their favor.

I don’t begrudge anybody making money every chance they get. I just don’t like liars. The final nail in the coffin for me was when their music guy came out and said worship leaders should never use their own songs with their own congregations. Uh huh. How about all that multi-gen material you publish from Houston First?

I wish a bunch of Baptists would get together and start a company that could compete with LifeWay, preferably to buy them out and dismantle the company forever. There are enough Pharisees in the SBC as it is. We shouldn’t have to buy our literature from them.

Back to topic, all of this stuff is exactly what I’ve been talking about. Well done!



thinkinginpictures
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 May 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,310

20 Dec 2020, 3:56 pm

roronoa79 wrote:
(I'm not a theist, this is just my perspective if I *were* a theist)

God didn't create genetic disorders as a kind of punishment. The bio-chemical processes that allows life to exist and perpetuate itself are not perfect. They are prone to errors from within and interference from without. Many factors can cause genes to mutate in ways that are harmful to an organism, much in the same way that they can mutate in ways that are beneficial to an organism. (Assuming your creationism accommodates evolution as a creation of God).
The laws of the universe are not meant to bend to prevent human misfortune. Asking genes to not combine or mutate in ways that harm people is like asking food not to go bad or asking gravity to stop working when you fall off a building.
The laws of the universe are mechanisms that keep the universe running consistently. Questioning why they are sometimes unfairly harmful to us specifically or life in general sounds like human self-importance.
God didn't create these scientific processes so they *would* harm us so much as god created these processes such that they *could* harm us. Being subject to these laws is just what it is to be mortal.


I've had similar ideas just like the above.

The reason it doesn't work for me, is because an omnipotent deity could simply create us without sin, and put us in paradise from the beginning, without the suffering.

But I've also come to realize that perhaps God is subject to the laws of logic like everything is. For instance, an all-powerful God could not make a rock so heavy it cannot carry it, because that would be a logical contradiction and hence outlawed - not by God, but because that's just how things work, its commons sense.

Which leaves us with the possibility that God's only choice would be to create a multiverse and let quantum darwinism play its part for the universe selected for life - then let nature's evolution do its part to create humans.

But then the question arise: Why the need for God anyway?

The Universe seems not to require a divine intervention.

Which has lead me to the following conclusion:

God is not outside the universe, but in it.
God is not a supernatural thing, but a result of complex set of human interactions.

What are those human interactions then, that God consists of?
The answer is, it is the interactions which makes life worth living for the individual and the humanity as a whole.
The individual and the group is equally important.

In other words, God is a personification of a specific set of ideas of how to order a society, and how to live in it.
This is what shapes mankind. In that sense, you could say that humans created God, but God shaped humans in his image - when we allow for God.

You could then argue that if God is "just" a personification of a specific set of ideas, then there could be more than one God. I say there cannot be more than one God, for the very simple reason that moral relativism is wrong.

Example: A culture that requires burning of widows (like India, before the British colonization ending the practice) is wrong and is certainly not equally as good as a culture that prohibits such practices, because there is no need for burning widows to make society work or make the individuals happy. Quite the contrary.

What constitutes the only righteous ideas is personal liberty, the freedom to not be forced into labor of any kind, the freedom to be with whomever you want to be with, provided their acceptance, and all other sorts of ideas which we take for granted in the Western culture.

In short: God is the personifcation of the ideas of Liberty, Peace and Compassion.
It can be nothing else.

...Regardless of whatever so-called "holy scripture" tells us. What we call holy scripture was written by humans, edited by humans - and copied or burned by humans. It has been either canonized - by humans or banned by humans.