How "Moderates" Serve The Right
funeralxempire
Veteran
Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 34,202
Location: Right over your left shoulder
Dox47 wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Saving it from itself how? He's not working to make the Democratic Party deliver jackshit for working people, he's a good example of someone who will deliver on corporate welfare but get cold feet when it comes to helping families.
Well, he's preventing them from passing a budget busting inflation boosting mess of a bill when they're already staring down electoral Armageddon next year, and he's blocking them from tearing down the filibuster, the only thing standing between them and ruin the next time the GOP has control, which McConnell has explicitly threatened.
I don't think they understand how weak they are, I'm pretty sure they've managed to alienate or at least disappoint every single demographic bloc that turned out strong in their favour in 2020.
They're the Washington Generals.
_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
Just a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.
ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 68
Gender: Male
Posts: 39,637
Location: Long Island, New York
NoClearMind53 wrote:
ASPartOfMe wrote:
roronoa79 wrote:
Conservatives: "Change to the status quo is bad, unless it reverts us to a previous status quo!"
Those who benefit from the status quo: "I like your way of thinking."
Moderates: "Change to the status quo is bad, unless it is slow and carried out through means I consider respectable."
Those who benefit from the status quo: "I like your way of thinking too."
Progressives: "The status quo is awful, and trying to change it through means the establishment finds acceptable is a recipe for change not coming at all."
Those who benefit from the status quo: "I like you much less than the other guys."
Those who benefit from the status quo: "I like your way of thinking."
Moderates: "Change to the status quo is bad, unless it is slow and carried out through means I consider respectable."
Those who benefit from the status quo: "I like your way of thinking too."
Progressives: "The status quo is awful, and trying to change it through means the establishment finds acceptable is a recipe for change not coming at all."
Those who benefit from the status quo: "I like you much less than the other guys."
A lot of truth but the big fallacy is the apparent assumption that all change is good. If all change is good any opposition to any change is a form of enabling the bad status quo. Otherwise, somebody has to say no or slow down. Slowing down gives people time to realize a mistake has been made and correct course and limit damage.
Strawman. Nobody thinks that all change is good. Also, the status quo is a moving train. Climate change keeps getting worse while doing nothing.
That is how I read what roronoa79 was saying. But I did write "apparently". Beyond roronoa79 I would be rich if I got money every time I read certain progressives saying resistance is futile to whatever we think is inevitable progress.
_________________
“Self Acceptance is a process not a performance”
“You are autistic enough. And you always have been”
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity.
funeralxempire
Veteran
Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 34,202
Location: Right over your left shoulder
ASPartOfMe wrote:
NoClearMind53 wrote:
ASPartOfMe wrote:
roronoa79 wrote:
Conservatives: "Change to the status quo is bad, unless it reverts us to a previous status quo!"
Those who benefit from the status quo: "I like your way of thinking."
Moderates: "Change to the status quo is bad, unless it is slow and carried out through means I consider respectable."
Those who benefit from the status quo: "I like your way of thinking too."
Progressives: "The status quo is awful, and trying to change it through means the establishment finds acceptable is a recipe for change not coming at all."
Those who benefit from the status quo: "I like you much less than the other guys."
Those who benefit from the status quo: "I like your way of thinking."
Moderates: "Change to the status quo is bad, unless it is slow and carried out through means I consider respectable."
Those who benefit from the status quo: "I like your way of thinking too."
Progressives: "The status quo is awful, and trying to change it through means the establishment finds acceptable is a recipe for change not coming at all."
Those who benefit from the status quo: "I like you much less than the other guys."
A lot of truth but the big fallacy is the apparent assumption that all change is good. If all change is good any opposition to any change is a form of enabling the bad status quo. Otherwise, somebody has to say no or slow down. Slowing down gives people time to realize a mistake has been made and correct course and limit damage.
Strawman. Nobody thinks that all change is good. Also, the status quo is a moving train. Climate change keeps getting worse while doing nothing.
That is how I read what roronoa79 was saying. But I did write "apparently". Beyond roronoa79 I would be rich if I got money every time I read certain progressives saying resistance is futile to whatever we think is inevitable progress.
Both Marxists and Whigs are big on the idea of certain changes being inevitable, basically two different reads of the idea that 'the arc of history bends towards justice'.
Personally I'm not sure that's the case, people cause it to bend in that direction or allow it to bend away from that direction depending on how hard and how many of them are leaning on it.
_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
Just a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.
ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 68
Gender: Male
Posts: 39,637
Location: Long Island, New York
funeralxempire wrote:
ASPartOfMe wrote:
NoClearMind53 wrote:
ASPartOfMe wrote:
roronoa79 wrote:
Conservatives: "Change to the status quo is bad, unless it reverts us to a previous status quo!"
Those who benefit from the status quo: "I like your way of thinking."
Moderates: "Change to the status quo is bad, unless it is slow and carried out through means I consider respectable."
Those who benefit from the status quo: "I like your way of thinking too."
Progressives: "The status quo is awful, and trying to change it through means the establishment finds acceptable is a recipe for change not coming at all."
Those who benefit from the status quo: "I like you much less than the other guys."
Those who benefit from the status quo: "I like your way of thinking."
Moderates: "Change to the status quo is bad, unless it is slow and carried out through means I consider respectable."
Those who benefit from the status quo: "I like your way of thinking too."
Progressives: "The status quo is awful, and trying to change it through means the establishment finds acceptable is a recipe for change not coming at all."
Those who benefit from the status quo: "I like you much less than the other guys."
A lot of truth but the big fallacy is the apparent assumption that all change is good. If all change is good any opposition to any change is a form of enabling the bad status quo. Otherwise, somebody has to say no or slow down. Slowing down gives people time to realize a mistake has been made and correct course and limit damage.
Strawman. Nobody thinks that all change is good. Also, the status quo is a moving train. Climate change keeps getting worse while doing nothing.
That is how I read what roronoa79 was saying. But I did write "apparently". Beyond roronoa79 I would be rich if I got money every time I read certain progressives saying resistance is futile to whatever we think is inevitable progress.
Both Marxists and Whigs are big on the idea of certain changes being inevitable, basically two different reads of the idea that 'the arc of history bends towards justice'.
Personally I'm not sure that's the case, people cause it to bend in that direction or allow it to bend away from that direction depending on how hard and how many of them are leaning on it.
The world needs both idealistic rebels who say FU we ARE going change the bad like it or not, and the stodgy old cumorgedons not so fast because my experience says you are going to lead us to disaster.
_________________
“Self Acceptance is a process not a performance”
“You are autistic enough. And you always have been”
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity.
ASPartOfMe wrote:
The world needs both idealistic rebels who say FU we ARE going change the bad like it or not, and the stodgy old cumorgedons not so fast because my experience says you are going to lead us to disaster.
A functional vehicle needs both engine and brakes.
_________________
Let's not confuse being normal with being mentally healthy.
<not moderating PPR stuff concerning East Europe>
magz wrote:
ASPartOfMe wrote:
The world needs both idealistic rebels who say FU we ARE going change the bad like it or not, and the stodgy old cumorgedons not so fast because my experience says you are going to lead us to disaster.
A functional vehicle needs both engine and brakes.funeralxempire
Veteran
Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 34,202
Location: Right over your left shoulder
_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
Just a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.
