ironpony wrote:
I guess I just don't understand why some people are against the idea of being able to shootback in self defense to prevent from possibly being killed. What's wrong with defending one's self, or why are there so many people who are pro-pacifism, and just let the attackers, attack you, etc? What's with the pro pacifism, turn the other cheek attitude? Or in a more extreme like this, it's more like a 'turn the other testicle' attitude.
I think a lot of people try to protect themselves with group-think and gangs, but in reality, in the event they would be alone and defenseless, they would want at the very least a pistol to defend themselves with, they would
need that gun. To save their sorry lives!