Rant about housing policies + bonus rant
goldfish21 wrote:
Slow incremental changes aren’t enough to meet housing demand asap.
The rental market is so tight that the average rent for a 1 bedroom apartment in Vancouver has hit $2945/mo in a city where the average salary is $62k. We need 6 storey apartment buildings, not duplexes.
The rental market is so tight that the average rent for a 1 bedroom apartment in Vancouver has hit $2945/mo in a city where the average salary is $62k. We need 6 storey apartment buildings, not duplexes.
The more high-demand locales need apartment buildings that are even taller than six storeys. The only question is where to put them. Putting them in neighborhoods zoned for single family houses just won't fly politically. But it might be possible (with a LOT of political effort) to increase the maximum height in neighborhoods that already have tall-ish buildings, or in neighborhoods that were formerly industrial zones.
goldfish21 wrote:
There is an empty homes tax for completely empty properties no one lives in. This got some of them rented, but even as the empty home tax increased rich people just pay it as a cost of their investment/vacation home. The tax would be unaffordable to us, but it’s nothing to some of them.
Then the tax should be increased even more. It should be increased until a significant number of those properties get rented or sold to people who will actually live there year-round.
_________________
- Autistic in NYC - Resources and new ideas for the autistic adult community in the New York City metro area.
- Autistic peer-led groups (via text-based chat, currently) led or facilitated by members of the Autistic Peer Leadership Group.
Last edited by Mona Pereth on 14 Aug 2023, 3:47 am, edited 1 time in total.
WirSindDasVolk wrote:
I think it's interesting that in the USA and Canada, self-identified leftist progressives want affordable housing, but they also want all of the housing to be open and spacious and have luxury quality. I recently had a conversation with someone who used the fact that you couldn't rent a two bedroom apartment with 30% of a minimum wage income to support one of his arguments (I don't remember what the argument was). Back when there were actually leftist countries, they gave people affordable housing, sure, but affordable housing meant a small room for your whole family on the fifth floor of a concrete building with no elevator.
I would actually support these types of commie blocks, because they would really put a dent in rent, and I personally don't need a lot of space. Unfortunately, people think they're an "eyesore" and would rather pay 60% of their paycheck on rent than have to look at rectangular buildings.
I would actually support these types of commie blocks, because they would really put a dent in rent, and I personally don't need a lot of space. Unfortunately, people think they're an "eyesore" and would rather pay 60% of their paycheck on rent than have to look at rectangular buildings.
Certainly, more apartment buildings are needed, with good public transportation access.
Too much "Open and spacious" housing, with its inevitable accompanying need for cars, is not only expensive but also very fuel-inefficient and thus one of the main causes of climate change. High-density housing is much "greener" in terms of its actual effect on the Earth.
_________________
- Autistic in NYC - Resources and new ideas for the autistic adult community in the New York City metro area.
- Autistic peer-led groups (via text-based chat, currently) led or facilitated by members of the Autistic Peer Leadership Group.
goldfish21
Veteran
Joined: 17 Feb 2013
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 22,612
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Mona Pereth wrote:
WirSindDasVolk wrote:
I think it's interesting that in the USA and Canada, self-identified leftist progressives want affordable housing, but they also want all of the housing to be open and spacious and have luxury quality. I recently had a conversation with someone who used the fact that you couldn't rent a two bedroom apartment with 30% of a minimum wage income to support one of his arguments (I don't remember what the argument was). Back when there were actually leftist countries, they gave people affordable housing, sure, but affordable housing meant a small room for your whole family on the fifth floor of a concrete building with no elevator.
I would actually support these types of commie blocks, because they would really put a dent in rent, and I personally don't need a lot of space. Unfortunately, people think they're an "eyesore" and would rather pay 60% of their paycheck on rent than have to look at rectangular buildings.
I would actually support these types of commie blocks, because they would really put a dent in rent, and I personally don't need a lot of space. Unfortunately, people think they're an "eyesore" and would rather pay 60% of their paycheck on rent than have to look at rectangular buildings.
Certainly, more apartment buildings are needed, with good public transportation access.
Too much "Open and spacious" housing, with its inevitable accompanying need for cars, is not only expensive but also very fuel-inefficient and thus one of the main causes of climate change. High-density housing is much "greener" in terms of its actual effect on the Earth.
Yep.
Very evident here where very wealthy people live in the city and the working class are commuting ever farther. There are people living in Hope and working in Vancouver now.. they're 152km apart.
The price of gas is becoming yet another kick in the wallet. We're at 207.9/L now and I heard on the radio that regular may be going to $2.50 in the next few weeks. I drive my little car for MOST things, truck very rarely as it takes twice as much gas. Motorcycle is only $1/100km cheaper than my car lol. I can foresee a lot of long distance commuters buying 2nd smaller cars/EV's for their commute. Maybe a lot of big trucks and SUV's will be sold off because the fuel bill is just crushing.
_________________
No
