CubsBullsBears wrote:
. . . this isn’t even about the trans community or people who perfer they/them pronouns (meaning, people who are non-binary). I have no problem using people’s preferred pronouns. However, I have noticed that people who are not in those categories stating their pronouns. Honestly, whenever I come across that I can’t help but think “this is unnecessary. I can tell what your pronouns are just by looking at you”.
[opinion=mine]Demanding the use of one's pronouns of choice is a form of identity politics (coupled with political correctness) that does more to alienate people than to establish and connections between them. Controlling the speech of others also violates the free-speech rights of those others, and objecting to a binary person's insistence on
their preferred pronouns because it is a "genderfluid thing" is akin to objecting to the "appropriation" of cultural traditions as one's own.
(I like wearing a barong tagalog to church services, especially here in the Philippines, and no one objects to my "appropriation" of Filipino/Maharlika cultural traditions.)
So, if anyone is going to insist that I use their preferred pronouns and objects to my insistence on asserting my own claim to "He/Him/His" pronouns, then I will call out their hypocrisy to their faces.
If they have the right to control my speech, then I have the
same right to control theirs.
[/opinion]
_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.