I can see the debate here about it with Hitler as an example, as well, several examples we can put about acts we find aborrent, most of us, but why do we find them and define them like that?
I think this question has taken different perspectives on how evil does exist and how it is suppose to exist to us to be able accept the validity of its existence.
Does evil really exist?
I believe that in order to accurately answer that question we have to have a concept of evil, some say that it doesn't exist, but why?
matsuiny2004 wrote:
Evil is a human concept and does therefore not exist, people are jsut as capable of doing good as they are at doing bad. They have a choice.
I agree that evil is a human concept, if evil does not exist then how come people are also capable of doing good and bad, they shouldn't exist either, wouldn't they?
As I perfectly agree that the concept of evil or bad and good are human concepts, they still have validity, evil is a concept based on human constructs made to identify actions that are considered morally wrong by some standards, which I know the concept of what is wrong have changed over time and it is quite different in many societies.
A concept most accepted today, is that evil is doing something that causes pain and suffering and damage to others in which the person who does the action is completely aware of it or the action is
Intentional. Other than that then it is not actually evil, even though depending on the situation some actions get punishment even if they are not actually intentional.
So, yes, evil does exist, and yes it is a human construct and perhaps measurement could be a better way to say it, clearly it is not as a solid object (which I find funny the claim of nonexistence because of this) that we can touch or smell, but a concept that has perfect value in society just as the the whole concept of morality.
_________________
?Everything is perfect in the universe - even your desire to improve it.?