slowmutant wrote:
Quote:
from a moral standpoint, i think the donatists have a very good point and i agree with their viewpoint of ex opere operantis. i'd say you seem like you would too but i doubt you have any actual morals of your own..just what you're spoonfed by others.
Who has ever developed spontaneous morals, independant of other human beings? If you're all alone, who is there to teach you values and right from-wrong? Inaminate objects? Sure, I was spoonfed my morals. They were given to me by others, but they have become my own. I think you're taking this "nonconformist freethinker rebel" stuff way too far.
John Donne said,
No man is an island. And he was right.
my point is that he has no morals other than what he is told. some people can develop morals through empathy like me while others have to rely on authoritative figures like church figures and that crap. my point is my morals are not marbles filling a glass but water. my morals while first introduced by others are refined and redefined as i go through life and learn more and see more of the world.
stagnant morality is as bad as no morality because it ends up with stupid garbage like that thread equating homosexuality to bestiality.
indeed, no man is an island...that's why my morals are ever evolving because i interact with people and gain different perspectives.
as far as taking nonconformist freethinker too far: obviously i haven't gone far enough yet.