oscuria wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
I'd have to respectfully disagree with you there.
I've read four of her books, and she's actually quite insightful, to say the least!
Pearl upon pearl of wisdom in those books, if you want me to be totally honest.
Yes, she's every bit the drama queen for effect, but her points resonate loud and clear.
Sargon wrote:
I've interacted with the crazies on both sides during and after college, and the people are actually true believers in their respective ideologies. While the Ann Coulters (isn't she a women) of the world may exaggerate their beliefs for dramatic effect on occasion, I think they also genuinely believe in their causes and they are right (of course they probably also might say people like you are talk and they don't really believe in what they claim to).
I never said they didn't know anything of what they spoke or write about. I'm merely comparing them to televangelists. I don't see anything conservative in their movements. They're just anti-left radicals.
And the functional difference between anti-left radicals and true conservatives would be...?
I see none.
Conservativism means continuing to do what has worked.
Liberalism means forsaking what has worked for the sake of trying what hasn't.
_________________
Christianity is different than Judaism only in people's minds -- not in the Bible.