Page 3 of 3 [ 43 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

peebo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Mar 2006
Age: 51
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,624
Location: scotland

25 May 2008, 6:35 am

oscuria wrote:
kraken wrote:
...note that Aryan always means Nordic...


no. it means noble. historically, the aryans were a culture of peoples who invaded india from the north and "civilised" the area.


_________________
?Civil government, so far as it is instituted for the security of property, is in reality instituted for the defense of the rich against the poor, or of those who have some property against those who have none at all.?

Adam Smith


oscuria
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,748

25 May 2008, 6:45 am

peebo wrote:
no. it means noble. historically, the aryans were a culture of peoples who invaded india from the north and "civilised" the area.


Did they invade or did they migrate? Who knows. I highly doubt the people who entered what is northern India came in chariots of war to kill its Dravidian people. The theory as far as I'm aware was proposed mainly because of the languages and certain passages in the Rg veda.

Besides, in my post I was explaining the Stormfront's interpretation of the word Aryan. I am well aware of what Arya means.

I still say Arya is just a title, and not actually a people. Unless of course you mean the Iranian people.


_________________
sticks and stones may kill you.


peebo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Mar 2006
Age: 51
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,624
Location: scotland

25 May 2008, 9:27 am

well i'm far from an expert but judging solely from what i've read it seems the consensus of opinion is that they invaded. you say you are well aware of what the word means, which is strange since in the post i quoted you stated that the word always means nordic. however, carry on...


_________________
?Civil government, so far as it is instituted for the security of property, is in reality instituted for the defense of the rich against the poor, or of those who have some property against those who have none at all.?

Adam Smith


oscuria
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,748

25 May 2008, 10:14 am

peebo wrote:
well i'm far from an expert but judging solely from what i've read it seems the consensus of opinion is that they invaded. you say you are well aware of what the word means, which is strange since in the post i quoted you stated that the word [b]always means nordic. however, carry on...[/b]


Because you aren't paying attention to context. Here, I'll help you out since I'm feeling alright.



Original Quote:
Quote:
I've visited Stormfront countless of times and their beliefs are as crazy as afrocentrists when it comes to history. Aryans (note that Aryan always means Nordic) came and settled into Egypt? An Aryan taught the mesoamericans how to build the Pyramids? Whaaaaaat?



Break Down I:
Quote:
Stormfront (A White Supremacist Website)'s . . . beliefs are crazy . . . when it comes to history.


Break Down II
Quote:
Aryans (note that Aryan always means Nordic {to a White Supremacist}) came and settled into Egypt (Which shows how ridiculous their beliefs in history is)?




Now read all of it again:


Quote:
I've visited Stormfront countless of times and their beliefs are as crazy as afrocentrists when it comes to history. Aryans (note that Aryan always means Nordic) came and settled into Egypt? An Aryan taught the mesoamericans how to build the Pyramids? Whaaaaaat?


Hmm???


Oh and there is no consensus on it which is why it is still called a theory, along with the Aryan Migration Theory. There hasn't been much evidence to believe that "Aryans" came into the region, deposed the "Dravidians" to Chandala status, taught the good ones Sanskrit and Hinduism, and finally taking the whole region by force to become one happy quad-caste family.


_________________
sticks and stones may kill you.


Odin
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2006
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,475
Location: Moorhead, Minnesota, USA

25 May 2008, 11:19 am

oscuria wrote:
peebo wrote:
no. it means noble. historically, the aryans were a culture of peoples who invaded india from the north and "civilised" the area.


Did they invade or did they migrate? Who knows. I highly doubt the people who entered what is northern India came in chariots of war to kill its Dravidian people. The theory as far as I'm aware was proposed mainly because of the languages and certain passages in the Rg veda.

Besides, in my post I was explaining the Stormfront's interpretation of the word Aryan. I am well aware of what Arya means.

I still say Arya is just a title, and not actually a people. Unless of course you mean the Iranian people.


Based on my reading it was the typical "barbarians munching on the carcass of a dead civilization and then taking over" pattern, the carcass being the Indus Valley Civilization. IIRC it was eastern Indo-European peoples (speakers of Proto-Indo-Iranian) in Central Asia around 2000BC that invented the war chariot. The Indo-Iranian speakers who stayed in Central Asia and SW Russia became the Scythians.

IIRC the Sanskrit word "Arya," and the Greek word "Aristos" (as in aristocracy) come from the same Proto-Indo-European root "Aryos" meaning "noble" or "virtuous" and seems to have been an ethnic self-label (tribal peoples tend to label themselves with terms like "the noble and good people" and label their neighbors with derogatory terms) that turned into a class or caste label


_________________
My Blog: My Autistic Life


Orwell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Aug 2007
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,518
Location: Room 101

25 May 2008, 11:24 am

Thomas1138 wrote:
Orwell wrote:
In other news, Hamas does not support Olmert. :D


Of course not. They're too busy supporting Obama ;)

Yes. As we all know, al-Qaida votes Democrat. :roll:


_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH


oscuria
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,748

25 May 2008, 12:03 pm

Odin wrote:

Based on my reading it was the typical "barbarians munching on the carcass of a dead civilization and then taking over" pattern, the carcass being the Indus Valley Civilization. IIRC it was eastern Indo-European peoples (speakers of Proto-Indo-Iranian) in Central Asia around 2000BC that invented the war chariot. The Indo-Iranian speakers who stayed in Central Asia and SW Russia became the Scythians.

IIRC the Sanskrit word "Arya," and the Greek word "Aristos" (as in aristocracy) come from the same Proto-Indo-European root "Aryos" meaning "noble" or "virtuous" and seems to have been an ethnic self-label (tribal peoples tend to label themselves with terms like "the noble and good people" and label their neighbors with derogatory terms) that turned into a class or caste label



The Harappan culture was on decline (or rather declined) before it was absorbed by the Arya. I haven't heard anything lately on it being considered an invasion, something which was heavily proposed during Indian colonization. From the sources that I read, it was just centuries of intermixing/mingling between the original inhabitants and the newer. How extensive were the Aryans in taking over? I'm pretty sure they just became swallowed into what is now India which is reflective on the people's dna.









Barrack Obama is not an official Aryan (remaining on topic)


_________________
sticks and stones may kill you.


kraken
Pileated woodpecker
Pileated woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 10 May 2008
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 180

25 May 2008, 1:01 pm

peebo wrote:
well i'm far from an expert but judging solely from what i've read it seems the consensus of opinion is that they invaded. you say you are well aware of what the word means, which is strange since in the post i quoted you stated that the word always means nordic. however, carry on...


Peebo, what oscuria means is that within the white nationalist mythos, the term 'aryan' is equated with the stereotypical 'nordic' phenotype. This usually means tall, physically hardy, blond hair, blue eyes, and a light complexion. He's pointing out that white nationalists mythologize their ideological roots in order to justify their positions on racial/ethnic relations today.



MissPickwickian
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Nov 2007
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,044
Location: Tennessee

26 May 2008, 9:22 pm

Ku Klux Klan DOES NOT endorse Barack Obama







DUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUHHHHH.


_________________
Powered by quotes since 7/25/10


burnse22
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 6 Apr 2008
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 383

27 May 2008, 6:18 am

Here is Snopes debunking the myth.


_________________
"Was that the bad thing?"
"Floss is boss. Floss is boss! FLOSS IS BOSS!! !"


theQuail
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 9 Dec 2007
Age: 33
Gender: Female
Posts: 231

27 May 2008, 8:47 am

:lol: This thread completely made my day.

The KKK still has members?