do we deserve to perish in a nuclear holocaust?

Page 3 of 12 [ 190 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 12  Next


do we deserve to perish in a nuclear holocaust?
yes 28%  28%  [ 13 ]
no 59%  59%  [ 27 ]
other (please qualify) 13%  13%  [ 6 ]
Total votes : 46

iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

29 Aug 2008, 11:28 pm

Does there exist a function where:

0 = 1
AND
1 = 1

:?:



chever
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Aug 2008
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,291
Location: Earth

29 Aug 2008, 11:41 pm

Um no


_________________
"You can take me, but you cannot take my bunghole! For I have no bunghole! I am the Great Cornholio!"


NeantHumain
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jun 2004
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,837
Location: St. Louis, Missouri

29 Aug 2008, 11:53 pm

Obviously no. How can a species, a planet, be deserving of this?



chever
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Aug 2008
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,291
Location: Earth

30 Aug 2008, 12:00 am

NeantHumain wrote:
Obviously no. How can a species, a planet, be deserving of this?


Well it looks like we really want it for ourselves

Image


_________________
"You can take me, but you cannot take my bunghole! For I have no bunghole! I am the Great Cornholio!"


NeantHumain
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jun 2004
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,837
Location: St. Louis, Missouri

30 Aug 2008, 12:02 am

chever wrote:
NeantHumain wrote:
Obviously no. How can a species, a planet, be deserving of this?


Well it looks like we really want it for ourselves

I take it that's a photograph from the Holocaust, but this is a non sequitur.



chever
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Aug 2008
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,291
Location: Earth

30 Aug 2008, 12:11 am

NeantHumain wrote:
chever wrote:
NeantHumain wrote:
Obviously no. How can a species, a planet, be deserving of this?


Well it looks like we really want it for ourselves

I take it that's a photograph from the Holocaust, but this is a non sequitur.


The Dresden bombing actually.

But history suggests that we really want to get rid of ourselves once and for all. We simply need a third party to carry out the deed since we're too scared to do it ourselves.


_________________
"You can take me, but you cannot take my bunghole! For I have no bunghole! I am the Great Cornholio!"


NeantHumain
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jun 2004
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,837
Location: St. Louis, Missouri

30 Aug 2008, 12:17 am

chever wrote:
NeantHumain wrote:
chever wrote:
NeantHumain wrote:
Obviously no. How can a species, a planet, be deserving of this?


Well it looks like we really want it for ourselves

I take it that's a photograph from the Holocaust, but this is a non sequitur.


The Dresden bombing actually.

But history suggests that we really want to get rid of ourselves once and for all. We simply need a third party to carry out the deed since we're too scared to do it ourselves.

I still don't know what you're talking about. Maybe you have some bizarre urge to die in some blaze of self-condemning nuclear fire, but I don't think most people do. I certainly don't, and I don't see how mentioning wars proves your point. To me, the destruction and warefare is only evidence that there are some greedy, hateful people in the world who have had too much power.



iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

30 Aug 2008, 12:33 am

Everyone dies, it is inevitable. How you die is not known.



chever
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Aug 2008
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,291
Location: Earth

30 Aug 2008, 12:40 am

NeantHumain wrote:
I still don't know what you're talking about.


Hint: Why do you think I'm interested in Lisp?

NeantHumain wrote:
To me, the destruction and warefare is only evidence that there are some greedy, hateful people in the world who have had too much power.


Most of the rest are complacent and/or indifferent, which is just as bad

Anyway, the greedy and hateful will always hold all of the real power in the world, so the will of the majority you referenced earlier will not be recognized in the long run anyway.


_________________
"You can take me, but you cannot take my bunghole! For I have no bunghole! I am the Great Cornholio!"


skafather84
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Mar 2006
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,848
Location: New Orleans, LA

30 Aug 2008, 12:53 am

chever wrote:
NeantHumain wrote:
I still don't know what you're talking about.


Hint: Why do you think I'm interested in Lisp?

NeantHumain wrote:
To me, the destruction and warefare is only evidence that there are some greedy, hateful people in the world who have had too much power.


Most of the rest are complacent and/or indifferent, which is just as bad

Anyway, the greedy and hateful will always hold all of the real power in the world, so the will of the majority you referenced earlier will not be recognized in the long run anyway.



you should change your name to ozymandias.


_________________
Wherever they burn books they will also, in the end, burn human beings. ~Heinrich Heine, Almansor, 1823

?I wouldn't recommend sex, drugs or insanity for everyone, but they've always worked for me.? - Hunter S. Thompson


chever
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Aug 2008
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,291
Location: Earth

30 Aug 2008, 1:12 am

skafather84 wrote:
you should change your name to ozymandias.


Never read Watchmen


_________________
"You can take me, but you cannot take my bunghole! For I have no bunghole! I am the Great Cornholio!"


BokeKaeru
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Jun 2008
Age: 38
Gender: Female
Posts: 535
Location: Boston, MA

30 Aug 2008, 1:35 am

No reason for the many to be punished for the bad doings of a few. Besides, what a waste of sentient life! I'd think our purpose is for much more than getting blown up, even if it's only a small number of people who ever do something truly magnificent. You could probably say that most people, beside genocidal dictators and corrupt corporate executives and child molesters and a few other unsavory types, achieve something magnificent in a way sometime in their lives.

I'm sick of the eco-freak argument that humanity is evil and rotten and needs to go. It completely misses the fact that, for all of humanity's flaws, it's also the only species that is able to recognize those flaws, recognize them to be bad, and perhaps deal with them. Slowly, yes, but it happens. No other species, given dominance of the planet, would do the same. I'm sorry, but the idea that somehow if only animals were in charge they'd be loving and respectful and wonderful to every living thing and the planet is complete bullcrap. Humans are the only beings, at least to my knowledge, with a conscience, and the genius and ability, to make progress from one era to the next. We might make mistakes, but we, unlike any other creature, have the power to fix them and make amends. For this reason alone, even if we didn't have a larger purpose, it can't be said that every living person deserves to die.



iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

30 Aug 2008, 1:42 am

This thread reminds me of the Quantum-Bomb controversy on a movie I watched a few weeks ago.



chever
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Aug 2008
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,291
Location: Earth

30 Aug 2008, 1:55 am

BokeKaeru wrote:
No reason for the many to be punished for the bad doings of a few.


You have a strange definition of 'few'.

BokeKaeru wrote:
Besides, what a waste of sentient life!


You have a strange definition of 'sentient'.

BokeKaeru wrote:
I'm sorry, but the idea that somehow if only animals were in charge they'd be loving and respectful and wonderful to every living thing and the planet is complete bullcrap.


They can go too. I'm not an 'eco freak' per se; we're marginally better than the rest of the animal kingdom. I am however an efficiency freak and it so happens that we will eventually impede progress, so we need to be scrapped at some point.

BokeKaeru wrote:
We might make mistakes, but we, unlike any other creature, have the power to fix them and make amends.


We also rarely use it.

It's the same shit, year in, year out.


_________________
"You can take me, but you cannot take my bunghole! For I have no bunghole! I am the Great Cornholio!"


Awesomelyglorious
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,157
Location: Omnipresent

30 Aug 2008, 9:37 am

NeantHumain wrote:
Obviously no. How can a species, a planet, be deserving of this?

Well, now we get into some weird moral issue, as the problem is "how can something deserve X?" and to be honest, I don't know how that works, but the fact is that it does.

BokeKaeru wrote:
No reason for the many to be punished for the bad doings of a few.

Ok, well, I think I've already argued that it is true that all human beings deserve to be destroyed in a nuclear holocaust.

Quote:
Besides, what a waste of sentient life!

I tend to think it is a good thing to get rid of defective material.
Quote:
I'd think our purpose is for much more than getting blown up, even if it's only a small number of people who ever do something truly magnificent. You could probably say that most people, beside genocidal dictators and corrupt corporate executives and child molesters and a few other unsavory types, achieve something magnificent in a way sometime in their lives.

You would think that, but then you'd be wrong. You could also say that, but you'd still be wrong.

Quote:
I'm sick of the eco-freak argument that humanity is evil and rotten and needs to go.

Who cares about mother nature? Have you ever thought about what a nuclear holocaust will do to the earth? Not a lot of good.
Quote:
It completely misses the fact that, for all of humanity's flaws, it's also the only species that is able to recognize those flaws, recognize them to be bad, and perhaps deal with them.

Well, yes, we can perhaps, maybe deal with them in a theoretical sense.... actual sense, no.

Quote:
Slowly, yes, but it happens. No other species, given dominance of the planet, would do the same. I'm sorry, but the idea that somehow if only animals were in charge they'd be loving and respectful and wonderful to every living thing and the planet is complete bullcrap. Humans are the only beings, at least to my knowledge, with a conscience, and the genius and ability, to make progress from one era to the next. We might make mistakes, but we, unlike any other creature, have the power to fix them and make amends. For this reason alone, even if we didn't have a larger purpose, it can't be said that every living person deserves to die.

So? Have you seen those other species? They're cool! We just suck. You could say that last part, but you'd be wrong.



Averick
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Mar 2007
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,709
Location: My tower upon the crag. Yes, mwahahaha!

30 Aug 2008, 8:59 pm

No, absolutely not!! Bio-weapons, perhaps, but not nuclear weapontry! Let the lucky ones who will tolerate the virus, bacteria, etc. inherit the earth after 99.9% of the morons disappear. I don't want to see such a beautiful planet go to waste.