Fraya wrote:
I think greed in that case would be replacing peoples jobs with machines and gaming the system to pay his employees the least amount possible while paying himself the maximum and growing the business simply to improve his own cut of the profits.
Most businesses today though only provide busy work at best. They exist for no other purpose than to create jobs. Other than infrastructure expansion and maintenance, construction, and food production what jobs are really essential? Any?
Actually, that's how the system is supposed to work, that isn't gaming. Gaming would be cheating and dishonesty in trades, the only exception may be the "paying himself the maximum" as that might represent a principle-agent problem, but honestly, growing the business for personal incentives is also expected.
I tend to doubt the validity of your notions. If they only exist to create jobs, then who pays them for those jobs? Why is there a threat of replacing jobs with machines, if businesses exist only to create jobs? In any case, either you are defining your terms broadly, essentialness narrowly(in which case I could argue that it could be narrower), or you have left off a lot of jobs that create value.