pakled wrote:
freedom of the press is limited to those who own one
at the time...it was thought that actually letting people read it would only help the Unibomber's case, so except for the New York Times (it's been awhile, but I think that was the one), no one actually had a copy. It's probably on the Internet, somewhere...
The Oakland (California) Tribune published it, because it was thought that the Unabomber may have lived in Berkeley (just north of Oakland) either at the time or at one time, and that somebody in Oakland/Berkeley may know him. They bet that anybody who might agree with it would already have that tendency, and that in all it wouldn't gain him any converts. In addition, the Oakland Tribune is generally not distributed outside of the Bay Area, except for a couple newsstands you can't even buy it in Sacramento. So the impact would be limited.
As it turns out, I did get a copy of the manifesto issue in Sacramento, read it, and agreed with it, so he won at least ONE convert. As it turns out, he taught briefly at UC Berkeley. The insert with the manifesto was quite intimidating-they had to use small print to fit it all in-so I bet that most Tribune readers just tossed it. As for it being available online, just google "Unabomber Manifesto" and you'll get a few million sites.