Joined: 18 Jan 2019 Age: 43 Gender: Male Posts: 1,644 Location: Warner Robins, Ga
31 Mar 2019, 5:05 pm
techstepgenr8tion wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4svUKPeDa5A
Yea, to each his or her own, I don't see me ever having sex with a robot. Just seems so dull and fake, mostly because it is. I love to get a woman off, that's the portion of sex that makes it worth it for me, I don't even have to have an orgasm to be satisfied, as long as I get to experience her having many orgasms, which of course is not possible with a robot.
I think Rogan is not seeing something. Women like vibrators and dildo's, a robot would just be a bigger toy for a woman. I think it's possible women would like sex-bots more than men.
The part that I don't understand about the MeToo site's narrative - that he killed himself to 'defame the movement'. That needs some careful pause for thought. He may have been guilty of the accusations, he may not have been, this never went to court so there's no way to conclude what an impartial body of law would have decided but regardless... suicide to besmirch political enemies? Something in that statement is really telling of what these people's valuation of human life has sunk to.
_________________ The loneliest part of life: it's not just that no one is on your cloud, few can even see your cloud.
The part that I don't understand about the MeToo site's narrative - that he killed himself to 'defame the movement'. That needs some careful pause for thought. He may have been guilty of the accusations, he may not have been, this never went to court so there's no way to conclude what an impartial body of law would have decided but regardless... suicide to besmirch political enemies? Something in that statement is really telling of what these people's valuation of human life has sunk to.
I have heard Tim talking about the me too movement a lot. It started out as a good thing then exploded into a big negative movement where women are simply taking advantage of what was created, making false accusations for their shot in the spotlight, to take political enemies out or to seek money. Now people are just going ape s**t with it, like the case against Neal deGrasse Tyson as one example. It's having a devestating repercussion, making men want to separate themselves from women in the work place from fear of being outed for unreasonable me too claims which is damaging women's rights because men are becoming less likely to hire women to avoid trouble in the work place. To expose legit cases is important, but like most movements as has been corrupted and women have been getting caught making false claims and overreacting with other claims. Basically men are becoming more scared to work with women as a result to prevent ridiculous and false claims being made.
And yes, some men do not take lightly to false accusations that may blast them all over media as a rapist. Like you said, it never made it to court, the far left wing approach tends to be to believe the so called victim. I've had a false claim on me, it's gotten ridiculous, you can't even give a woman a compliment or you risk it being blown out of proportion and that, for someone like me, made work rather uncomfortable, it honestly made me feel like killing myself so I wouldn't have to face the situation, all I did was say she looked nice today, it wasn't even at work, she did work with me, so she called my work place and got them involved, it even got sent to a lawyer, which said that she was overreacting. I would be scared to work with women also, if all it takes is a compliment to be considered as sexual harrasment.
I guess the point isn't to claim he is innocent, but to show how even false accusations could cause one to kill themselves. It's rather embarrassing and extremely uncomfortable for something like that to go down, especially when it escalates to a degree where you have several people at work sitting down to talk to you about it.
Joined: 6 Feb 2005 Age: 45 Gender: Male Posts: 24,593 Location: 28th Path of Tzaddi
02 Apr 2019, 10:43 pm
I'm watching this a bit late in the evening so I may not be able to finish tonight but I remember Jonathan talking about this several months ago (or at least in an interview before this saying it's where he was going). It's finally out - ie. his IQSquared panel from November 2018.
_________________ The loneliest part of life: it's not just that no one is on your cloud, few can even see your cloud.
Joined: 18 Jan 2019 Age: 43 Gender: Male Posts: 1,644 Location: Warner Robins, Ga
03 Apr 2019, 3:25 pm
techstepgenr8tion wrote:
I'm watching this a bit late in the evening so I may not be able to finish tonight but I remember Jonathan talking about this several months ago (or at least in an interview before this saying it's where he was going). It's finally out - ie. his IQSquared panel from November 2018.
I watched this one last night, it was pretty good. My mind is pretty made up on free speech for a lot of reasons. I will listen to others to see why they think speech should be limited, I don't think they grasp the dangers of it though, some people try to deny the slippery slope argument, it seems pretty obvious that it is a slippery slope, who gets to decide what is illegal speech? Once you start policing speech, who ever is in power or what the majority thinks, thus in times where religion was more a majority belief, it would be illegal to say otherwise...just as it was in the past. Gays would be condemned without free speech because they would not have had their right to speak out about it thus preventing it from becoming a majority view.
These early generations do not understand the danger of limiting free speech, the dangers are when it turns against you, be very careful at what powers you allow a government to have because that power can be used against you. Then to add, I am very against what these people suggest, they are racist and don't even understand it. Tim Pool pointed this out, I had never actually made the connection, but these people, the radicals that believe in segregation and banning free speech have more in common with white supremacists than moderate conservatives. I like when minorities speak out at these people to show them how wrong they are, these days the message is just more powerful coming from a minority. Towards the end in the Q & A, a black women stepped in to try to point the obvious out, you do not overcome racism by segregation, that's more so how you spread racism.
People need to come together, not divide themselves. Also, one black guy spoke out with a powerful message, he said, when I look at this majority white crowd, I don't see a room full of white people, I see a room full of individuals. So the guy on stage replies with just more racist thoughts, "you may not think you are seen as a black man but that is what you are seen as", all that is is racial paranoia, the root of racism. These people seem rather ridiculous to me, she claimed they needed to ban hate speech while it was pointed out that they already do that on campus, you can't get up on a college platform and start preaching about white supremacy(if they do in any schools I can understand banning that), but what they are doing is trying to silence speech they do not agree with and attempt to false label particular ideas or even facts that they disagree with as racist. Anyway, it was a pretty good talk.