Board index › Topical Discussion › Politics, Philosophy, and Religion

Rampant issues with feminism....

Page 22 of 33 [ 515 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 ... 33  Next

Previous topic | Next topic

ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 122
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

08 Feb 2013, 11:33 pm

LKL wrote:
As for why women don't 'reward nice guys with sex,' the reason is that you shouldn't expect a cookie for being a decent human being.


I wasn't talking about cookies--just reward your toadies with a little sex. They'll enjoy it, and you really won't be out anything anyway, will you?

LKL wrote:
Being a decent human being is the *minimum* acceptable behavior, not something that inspires a woman to leave her current partner or even to break a stretch of celibacy.


No one is talking about leaving anyone's current partner. Just providing a little sex. Think of it as nothing more significant than shaking hands.



LKL
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2007
Age: 50
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,402

08 Feb 2013, 11:36 pm

do you really place so little value on partnership?



AspieOtaku
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Feb 2012
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,051
Location: San Jose

09 Feb 2013, 12:29 am

It is a war between the penis and the vagina! Eventually the vagina will assume control over the penis devour it then suck the life force from it!Leaving the penis drained and tired!


_________________
Your Aspie score is 193 of 200
Your neurotypical score is 40 of 200
You are very likely an aspie
No matter where I go I will always be a Gaijin even at home. Like Anime? https://kissanime.to/AnimeList


Tyri0n
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Nov 2012
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,879
Location: Douchebag Capital of the World (aka Washington D.C.)

09 Feb 2013, 12:51 am

ArrantPariah wrote:
YippySkippy wrote:
Quote:
And it turned out it was all for nothing.


Did you think the feminists were supposed to pay you with sex for supporting their ideals?
That if you do or say something a woman likes, you're entitled to a shag?
And if she doesn't pay up, she's a b***h?
Is that your thought process? Really?
:roll:


I suppose it is fair to ask: Why shouldn't Feminists reward the "nice guys" who support their positions with a bit of shagging?.


Because they're ugly?



ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 122
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

09 Feb 2013, 8:47 am

LKL wrote:
do you really place so little value on partnership?


I didn't say that Feminists should abandon their partners.

It is the value of coitus that I would like to see diminish.

The way that Feminists keep their knees together, some heterosexual men are likely eventually to form the conclusion that Feminism isn't really so great after all.

Spreading the wealth more freely would promote egalitarianism, get more men on your side, and keep them there.



Tequila
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 28,897
Location: Lancashire, UK

09 Feb 2013, 8:49 am

ArrantPariah wrote:
The way that Feminists keep their knees together, some heterosexual men are likely eventually to form the conclusion that Feminism isn't really so great after all.


What makes you think that an awful lot of them haven't formed that conclusion already?

There are reasons why marriage and birthrates are falling through the roof.



ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 122
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

09 Feb 2013, 8:49 am

Tyri0n wrote:
ArrantPariah wrote:
I suppose it is fair to ask: Why shouldn't Feminists reward the "nice guys" who support their positions with a bit of shagging?.


Because they're ugly?


That's very unegalitarian of you. :shameonyou:



Tequila
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 28,897
Location: Lancashire, UK

09 Feb 2013, 8:50 am

ArrantPariah wrote:
That's very unegalitarian of you. :shameonyou:


Does it stop it being the truth?

I think there is a difference between the types of feminists being talked about. I think the bitter, angry type is the one that is referred to so negatively.



ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 122
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

09 Feb 2013, 9:10 am

Tequila wrote:
ArrantPariah wrote:
That's very unegalitarian of you. :shameonyou:


Does it stop it being the truth?

.


If Feminists want men to stop objectifying women, the Feminists should take the first step and stop objectifying men.

Equal Access for All!



Misslizard
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jun 2012
Age: 61
Gender: Female
Posts: 20,550
Location: Aux Arcs

09 Feb 2013, 10:44 am

What exactly to you mean by "feminist"?
I think I should get payed the same for the same job,if I can physically do the job,be hired as same as a man,expect the same pay raise,etc.....
I don't want to be judged on my looks or because I'm a girl.and I hate it when men make remarks about women drivers,statistically men are more reckless behind the wheel.
If a woman hits a man she should be charged with a domestic,you know the old saying,
"what's good for the goose is good for the gander."
And most men are fine the way they are,the few obnoxious a$$holes make the whole male sex look bad.But I'm glad men are around,some are stand up fellows. :wink:


_________________
I am the dust that dances in the light. - Rumi


ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 122
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

09 Feb 2013, 4:46 pm

ArrantPariah wrote:
Also, many Feminists, like most women, seem interested in scoring themselves a high-status alpha dog. Once she has him, she then wants to go to work changing him.....(etc.)


Having been convicted of sexism, against both men and women, for offering the above observations for discussion, I retract the said observations unreservedly.

Instead, I posit the following for discussion:

Sex between people occurs in a purely random and completely unpredictable manner, without regard to either party's sexiness, social status or personality. If some people feel that they aren't getting enough, then this is purely due to chance, and imagined social disadvantage plays absolutely no role in the outcome.



Tequila
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 28,897
Location: Lancashire, UK

09 Feb 2013, 4:48 pm

Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!



ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 122
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

09 Feb 2013, 6:52 pm

Tequila wrote:
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!


That had better not be a sexist laugh. :shameonyou:



Tequila
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 28,897
Location: Lancashire, UK

09 Feb 2013, 7:03 pm

Not at all, my purely gender-neutral acquaintance.



ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 122
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

09 Feb 2013, 7:04 pm

:salut:



ripped
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Jan 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 651

09 Feb 2013, 9:07 pm

ArrantPariah wrote:
YippySkippy wrote:
Quote:
And it turned out it was all for nothing.


Did you think the feminists were supposed to pay you with sex for supporting their ideals?
That if you do or say something a woman likes, you're entitled to a shag?
And if she doesn't pay up, she's a b***h?
Is that your thought process? Really?
:roll:


I suppose it is fair to ask: Why shouldn't Feminists reward the "nice guys" who support their positions with a bit of shagging?


Because they are weak and submissive and they turn the women off.