Sand wrote:
There is no doubt that some religious organizations have done wonderful things and some have done horrible things. The important question is whether it is religion is the inspiration for the good works or whether the people in these organizations would have acted well whether or not they were religious. And if religious organizations have done horrible things, does that indicate something about the power of religion to divert people from acting badly?
Historical data is too sparse to do much statistical analysis of the problem. Stalin and Mao killed a lot of people, and they were atheist. The Crusaders killed a lot of people, and they were Christian. And then too many complicating factors (such as the ease of killing large numbers of people) make it even harder to approach this in an objective manner. Religious organizations do tend to be more involved in charity work than non-religious organizations, but there could be other factors at play. I've met atheists who were very kind, generous, and charitable, and I've met atheists who were complete selfish dicks. Same for Christians I've met. I won't rely on anecdotal evidence from myself to decide which is more prevalent.
_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH