Board index › Topical Discussion › Politics, Philosophy, and Religion

Rampant issues with feminism....

Page 23 of 33 [ 515 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26 ... 33  Next

Previous topic | Next topic

ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 122
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

09 Feb 2013, 10:00 pm

No. That would be sexist. :shameonyou:

Their lack of coitus is purely due to chance, and being weak and submissive plays absolutely no role in the outcome.



LKL
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2007
Age: 50
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,402

10 Feb 2013, 12:26 am

ArrantPariah wrote:
LKL wrote:
do you really place so little value on partnership?


I didn't say that Feminists should abandon their partners.

It is the value of coitus that I would like to see diminish.

The way that Feminists keep their knees together, some heterosexual men are likely eventually to form the conclusion that Feminism isn't really so great after all.

Spreading the wealth more freely would promote egalitarianism, get more men on your side, and keep them there.

If sex is that meaningless to you, get yourself a fleshlight and quit nagging women.



ripped
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Jan 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 651

10 Feb 2013, 5:38 am

Isn't feminism anti-sex? I thought that feminism was anti-sex.
anti porn, anti prostitution, anti sex?



Who_Am_I
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Aug 2005
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,632
Location: Australia

10 Feb 2013, 6:02 am

ripped wrote:
Isn't feminism anti-sex? I thought that feminism was anti-sex.
anti porn, anti prostitution, anti sex?


No, it isn't anti-sex.


_________________
Music Theory 101: Cadences.
Authentic cadence: V-I
Plagal cadence: IV-I
Deceptive cadence: V- ANYTHING BUT I ! !! !
Beethoven cadence: V-I-V-I-V-V-V-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I
-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I! I! I! I I I


ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 122
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

10 Feb 2013, 8:32 am

Yes it is. Feminists are big promoters of fleshlights to keep men entertained.



ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 122
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

10 Feb 2013, 8:39 am

A scene from The Graduate

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=30H1u6oETbU[/youtube]

Benjamin considered the coitus that he had enjoyed with Mrs. Robinson to have been no more significant, and of no more value than a handshake.



Tequila
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 28,897
Location: Lancashire, UK

10 Feb 2013, 8:42 am

ArrantPariah wrote:
Benjamin considered the coitus that he had enjoyed with Mrs. Robinson to have been no more significant, and of no more value than a handshake.

The bad guy won in that film. He made me cringe so much.



MCalavera
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Dec 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,442

10 Feb 2013, 8:43 am

ripped wrote:
Isn't feminism anti-sex? I thought that feminism was anti-sex.
anti porn, anti prostitution, anti sex?


Feminism is a broad ideology with various forms of it. The only exclusively common theme among them all is the focus on women's rights. Sex or no sex is dependent on which version of feminism you're talking about.



Tequila
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 28,897
Location: Lancashire, UK

10 Feb 2013, 8:44 am

MCalavera wrote:
The only exclusively common theme among them all is the focus on women's rights.

Are you sure about that? Some of the religiously conservative and anti-sex forms of feminism certainly focus on denying women's rights, but is that covered?



MCalavera
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Dec 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,442

10 Feb 2013, 8:49 am

Tequila wrote:
MCalavera wrote:
The only exclusively common theme among them all is the focus on women's rights.

Are you sure about that? Some of the religiously conservative and anti-sex forms of feminism certainly focus on denying women's rights, but is that covered?


But the focus is still on women's rights even if it's according to the way they see things.

It doesn't matter if those branches conflict with one another in terms of what exactly they're fighting for.



Tequila
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 28,897
Location: Lancashire, UK

10 Feb 2013, 8:52 am

MCalavera wrote:
But the focus is still on women's rights even if it's according to the way they see things.

In the same way that the KKK has a focus on black people's rights...



MCalavera
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Dec 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,442

10 Feb 2013, 8:56 am

Tequila wrote:
MCalavera wrote:
But the focus is still on women's rights even if it's according to the way they see things.

In the same way that the KKK has a focus on black people's rights...


No, the focus is on suppressing those rights. That's their expressed motive.



Tequila
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 28,897
Location: Lancashire, UK

10 Feb 2013, 8:58 am

MCalavera wrote:
No, the focus is on suppressing those rights. That's their expressed motive.


So, if the motive and focus was expressed in the same way as, oh, religiously conservative 'feminists' but the actual detail of their policies would be much the same, it could be considered the same?



MCalavera
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Dec 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,442

10 Feb 2013, 9:01 am

Tequila wrote:
MCalavera wrote:
No, the focus is on suppressing those rights. That's their expressed motive.


So, if the motive and focus was expressed in the same way as, oh, religiously conservative 'feminists' but the actual detail of their policies would be much the same, it could be considered the same?


Keep things simple, Tequila.

These feminists that you speak of still have women's rights in the best interests. They just have different perceptions of what constitutes women's rights.



Tequila
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 28,897
Location: Lancashire, UK

10 Feb 2013, 9:04 am

MCalavera wrote:
These feminists that you speak of still have women's rights in the best interests. They just have different perceptions of what constitutes women's rights.


Yes: get in the kitchen and cook me a meal, then go to the bedroom where I will do whatever I want with you and you cannot ever object, because we are married. Whenever we go out (to church and to get supplies only), dress yourself in heaps of clothing in case you turn on some man and he will want to find you and rape you when I'm not in. If he does rape you, it's all your own fault.

That sounds like feminism alright.



MCalavera
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Dec 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,442

10 Feb 2013, 9:11 am

Tequila wrote:
MCalavera wrote:
These feminists that you speak of still have women's rights in the best interests. They just have different perceptions of what constitutes women's rights.


Yes: get in the kitchen and cook me a meal, then go to the bedroom where I will do whatever I want with you and you cannot ever object, because we are married. Whenever we go out (to church and to get supplies only), dress yourself in heaps of clothing in case you turn on some man and he will want to find you and rape you when I'm not in. If he does rape you, it's all your own fault.

That sounds like feminism alright.


Quote one feminist group that states this.