JohnPowell wrote:
Biscuitman wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
You just completely ignored what I wrote. Parliament had already voted to leave without a deal!! ! ! ! !
I ignored it as it was factually incorrect. They have not voted to do that. They voted against no deal in parliament, same as they voted against revoking A50 and against a 2nd referendum.
They voted to leave with or without a deal on the 29th of March. It was enshrined in British law but International Law was used by May to stop us leaving. Which is absurd as it was International Law that Assange had the right to asylum. None of those votes changed British Law. You are clueless.
Why must you all use media insults to sidle with a mock house jury whose ears cannot be reached? The slaughterhouse insignia treaty is taking place at number 10, Downing street.
I am not interested in so called conspiracy theories anyway, or people trying to demonstrate their awareness of media political debates and highlighting news media coverage, already seen and heard, whether to be believed or not by the press or public. Distinguish the mad hype from the media coverage, is like a leaver trying to go Bremain, but going, ''Where's Nigel?'', in a foray of tidal wave Brexiteering.
The toning down approach of leaving the E.U, is.- let us all think, is, to Leave and not back out.
If the triage is to stay, then good luck to the backlash of ex-hypodermis royal Britannia cohorts.
Focus on tomorrows E.U result of the polls might raise a few eyebrows, but damn if new voters should be allowed the final say on a backlash of heated exchanges and suicide notes. I know whose head I'd like to see on a stick, and seeing as Guy Fawkes failed that mission, I'd say the impossible is about to happen, ten-four.
We'll be seeing more of you peeps on tomorrows grapevine, and new world exchanges. Ditto.