Anarchy

Post Reply New Topic

How would you define racism then?


That's the point.


That's also the point, moron. Thanks for proving them for me... again.

I find it funny how you made my insults 42% more efficient just by saying three sentences. Maybe if you weren't such an attention seeker, then you wouldn't fail at life so hard.

"In this day and age, an era where people throw s**t at each other, anything is possible".

Hohohohoho. Anarchy.

MAY be possible, but only when everyone is intelligent, educated, and compassionate enough to work in cooperation. It sounds all nice and fun, but it is far from possible at the moment. It's naive to think that anarchist societies are possible at this age, and even then, there are assumptions about human nature which are uncertain. The world still needs law, order, and government, and will continue to for at least another two centuries, maybe more. Humanity is still far from mature enough for this to happen.
However, maybe with massively increasing knowledge which is free to access, good. stable living standards which are only possible with a more stable, possibly more mixed economic system, and the elimination of disease, poverty, genetic modification, and full literacy, this will become even more of a possibility.
Perhaps it will not happen. Perhaps the only real difference will be technological. Never has the future of the world had so many imaginable possibilities. It could twist in so many different ways.

The point was showing your exceedingly poor programming skills? And you really got distinctions for those apps? Look at the people sitting around you in your classroom. Are they:

• Flapping their hands?
• Using safety pencils?
• Hyperextending their arms and fingers?

If so, and it seems likely considering how low your school's standards are, you may want to consider transferring to a 'normal' school for a greater challenge. (But only if you can handle the heavier course load of course.)

No. The point was that my awful code is better than your awful intelligence. You have got to be the dumbest person on the planet.

• This was 3 years ago, I passed the whole course with a Triple Merit.
• It was college not school.
• I never saw you anywhere.
• The course was Software Development, which entails: -
  
  • Gathering requirements for the proposed business solution
  • Analyzing the problem
  • Devising a plan or design for the software-based solution
  • Implementation (coding) of the software
  • Testing the software
  • Deployment
  • Maintenance and bug fixing
• And thus more about the paperwork, not the app.

I don't think deliberately writing a poor app to get better grades counts as incompetant. [sarcasm]Sorry to f**k up your quest, dude.[/sarcasm]

Dumb people don't learn Lisp. Dumb people brag about how easy and unfulfilling technical careers are (while making it clear as day they aren't cut out for the same), make insensitive comments about people of other ethnicities, and then flood the board with pictures from /b/, obnoxiously breaking up the page layout in doing so. And then jerk it to loli porn for the rest of the afternoon.

And before you jump on my balls for making insensitive comments about English people, I should point out that it's not exactly an 'other ethnicity' in this case. For I have a little in me, too. But more Irish. You can tell by my full set of teeth, the reddish tinge to my beard, and the fact that Thai people don't run screaming away from me by default.



How?



College is a kind of school.



That's what we call a 'BS class' here.

And I don't buy your excuse for sucking either.

All this nastiness from someone who attends a Pentecostal church and claims to believe in Jesus. Tsk, tsk...

Yes, humanity has been bred and programmed to be sheep.. and most people will sign their life away without reading the documents.. people really are uneducated and gullible. Maturity is a big factor as well, we have lived for thousands of years letting someone else make our major decisions.. (well, our ancestors and so on).





Yes, like bringing back HEMP, the single greatest substance in the world.. we could survive independantly..




And healing via vibrations:

http://liberatedlinguists.ning.com/prof ... st%3A17847





as long as you believe in the possibilities, then that is what matters.. you think with some real sense in you. anarchy is a risky subject, but the government is afraid of us.. we should not fear them.

If by fulfilling you mean wealthy then yes it must be fulfilling.. but I've heard of many intelligent people who put down those experts that you admire so much.. the government needs all of these 'experts' to think for us because they don't want us to become real experts ourselves.

Knowing Lisp, or any other programming language for that matter, doesn't make you smart. It may mean you have a good memory but other than that it doesn't show much.

You fall under this category.


Yet again, something I never did.


Macrochan is not /b/ DIYDespair is not /b/ and Photobucket is not /b/ You also clearly have no idea what /b/ or 4chan are.


Once again, proving you have no idea what racism, or ethnicity is. Now I can sit here and endure your racist hate speech or you can be a civilised human being.


You clearly have no idea was Systems Analysis and Design is then.


The apps did what they were supposed to do. Adding extra functions would have been unneccessary not to mention a complete waste of time, and besides, using bad code as an insult is not an excuse.

[sarcasm]Becuase you are at the ultimate pinnacle of enlightenment, right?[/sarcasm]And besides, me calling you up for being an obnoxious arrogant prick is not 'nastiness', you baby.

You: -

• Can't understand what other people are saying.
• Are an attention seeking ballbag.
• Have no concept of the application of the English language.
• Have no idea what intelligence is.
• Have no idea what trolling is, or how to counter it.
• Can't understand satire, irony, sarcasm, black comedy or any form of humour whatsoever.
• Have no idea what Systems Analysis and Design is or what it entails.
• Are an obnoxious arrogant prick with no sense of manners.
• Denied things in the face of blatant evidence.
• Have exploded like a 13 year old child on crystal meth with a gun.
• Displayed nothing but a puny Internet tough guy mentality.
• Bragged about skills you clearly don't have.
• Tried to call me up on things that I either: a)never did, b)you are also doing or c)both.
• Continuously made things up.
• Are still an immature prick.
• Are still unable to engage in reasoned debate.
• Still have the Aesthetic and Linguistic ability of a turd.
• Have jumped from pre-suppositions to unwarranted conclusions.
• Have made it blatantly obvious how incapable you are of functioning in society.
• Have an abnegating cecity and an ego larger than the moon.
• Harped on about irrelevant pieces of information that clearly show you have no clue what you are on about.
• Have have been led away from your arguments and points without even realising.
• Failed to back up your arguments at all.
• Provided inadequate evidence.
• Have no idea what a dictionary is.
• Have no idea what an expert is.
• Have no idea what Synonyms are.
• Have no idea what Similes and Metaphors are.
• Have no idea what colloquisms are.
• Do everything you criticise me for doing (things I don't even do anyway).
• Have continously committed a vast number of argumental fallacies

I could go on.

By your own admission, you are a racist bigoted sociopath with no life outside of this forum and that nothing you are saying is true anyway. You are also continously proving my points for me.

That's pretty stupid, by any definition of the word.

It's okay to fight but you are all getting a little too personal and it's not funny anymore, it's just sad.

I'll stop butting and playing the polly anna role in just a minute.

The system that we were talking about would eliminate the need to misdirect aggression through wars.
Has anyone looked into the Bonobo idea yet?
Remember?

If you haven't been paying attention, then reread Accelerators post.

It's good to fight though. Maybe you should take up a wrestling class or boxing or something. How about try out for a football team?
I'm serious and I'm not being sarcastic. Or, maybe get a nice girlfriend to have sex with on a daily basis. Sex and Aggression release the same chemicals in the brain. I'll butt out again...

Lol..

I think anarchy is good, because the government is afraid of it.. just like they are afraid of hemp, because it causes people to rebel.. "but rebel against what?" -Bob Marley.

I dont recommend sports.. there is nothing worldly or intellectual about it.. lift a few weights or run around, and stay in shape... ugh, sports are so lame. And pointless..

deleted...oh...why do I care?

To paraphrase Henri Poincaré, a programming language is a collection of facts. But a collection of facts is no more a programming language than a pile of stones is a house.

There's a lot more to programming than rote memorization. Since you don't know how to do it well, this must come as a surprise, but, especially with applicative languages such as Lisp, there's a lot of abstraction and theoretical content you have to master in order to program efficiently (i.e. not copy and paste to build up an ugly switch/case statement).



How am I not cut out for computer science and math?

Where did I say these fields are unfulfilling?

Are you using the "I am rubber, you are glue" defense? That got old in 2nd grade.



Making fun of someone's name for having the word 'porn' in it.



I don't care how impressive the name sounds, your class is extremely lax.



LOL, bounds checking and not repeating yourself are not extraneous bells and whistles.

Those are basic software engineering standards, really.



WWJD, tsk tsk...



You sure could.



You're a shoe-in for 'Hater of the Year'



LOL. Do you want pix of my life outside this forum?

I oppose anarchy for a very simple reason Magnus. Under anarchy, there are no rules set in place and people can do whatever they feel like. Under anarchy, I could steal whatever I want, kill anyone who gets in my way, and do as I please without anyone holding me accountable for my behavior. Of course, because I'm a Christian, I would never do these things, but if anarchy existed, no one would be safe. Thugs and criminals could do whatever they wanted, and people who were previously restricted by laws would do exactly as they pleased. Read Lord of the Flies, and you'll understand how dangerous anarchy is.

The government was established to make sure that people's rights are protected, that people are justly compensated for their damages, and that there would be peace and rules/regulations to live by. Our government is by no means perfect, but if you look at the rest of the world and their governments, ours works much better. Yes, there are greedy politicians, and politics turn people against each other, but there are no wars going on in America because we have a balance of powers between the Executive (President), Judicial (Courts), and Legislative branches. I disagree with the War in Iraq, I do think that Bush greatly misused his power, but since we're there, we may as well make the best of it.

As for your idea of a dominant leader in the government, that is a scary thought, sounds like an anti-christ like figure. After winning the Reveloutionary War, Thomas Jefferson and Anti-Federalists wanted to make sure that no one like King George III would take over the new formation of the United States of America and that people would be in control of the government. The Federalists, including John Adams, George Washington, and Alexander Hamilton, wanted the government to have more power and influence on the people, and it would be more than likely under a federalist government that the President could become more of a king figure. I don't want a monarchy, I want a democracy and a republic where people control the government, not one person becoming so powerful that they override the system.

I have a shorter argument: Somalia.

Our founding fathers were anarchists. They rebelled because they didn't want to pay all the British taxes.

Begin at the beginning and rethink what you said AutisticMalcontent. It's quite entertaining if you have time to read it all.

And Chever, go sit in the corner and think about what you just said.

Or, let's just change the subject altogether and use this thread for disorderly ranting.

They obviously weren't anarchists, because they formed two new governments after they threw off the British yoke, the latter of which was necessarily stronger than the first.