Misogyny/MRA is a sign of weakness
Greb wrote:
That's very related with facial structure. Check that both Jack Kerouac and Albert Camus have a similar one, and that's what you find attractive. They only need to avoid overweight to keep 'hotness'. The same with, I don't know, Grace Kelly. She wouldn't need daily gym to be attractive.
Take Pete Doherty that likes this kind of shots and you see it's all about facial structure. And this is genetic. Some people have a pretty/exotic/attractive face and other don't.
Pete Doherty doesn't have the right facial structure to pull it off in pictures, so I see what you mean. If he wrote better music and wasn't such a waster, he'd be more attractive, though. I think part of it is the personality and talent of the guy. Doherty's too much of a wannabe.
I guess I like a handsome face, what can I say? None of the men I've been with would be able to pull off a 50s smoking beatnik photo, so I reckon that's the power of personality at work.
_________________
Zombies, zombies will tear us apart...again.
1000Knives wrote:
puddingmouse wrote:
1000Knives wrote:
Anyway, I wanna look like Lu Xiaojun. Chinese Olympic lifter.
http://farm5.staticflickr.com/4111/5062 ... 91cd_z.jpg
Don't kill yourself (figuratively) over it, though!
http://farm1.staticflickr.com/116/28069 ... 4494c8.jpg
That's Taner Sagir.
I pretty much look like this now. Oddly both those guys are in the same weight class, 77K, but Taner has a higher bodyfat than Lu.
Also I think bodybuilding is kind of lame, and does have much of it's roots in homosexual stuff. This is pretty easy to historically verify. Basically, I've heard bodybuilding described as "The male version of objectification" which I think is accurate. But I think bodybuilding is sorta...dead. The media ideal of the 70s and 80s of every guy being hyooge, is pretty much over. Now because of feminism (f**k it, I'll throw around the Matriarchy in this thread, why not) all that's sort of expected out of guys now is mega ultra low bodyfat. I'm sure many people here have seen the pictures Kurgan put up of Justin Beiber and whatnot.
I don't think the Arnold or Lou Ferrigno kinda look is really preferred anymore. Part of the reason is, it's actually really simple. Drugs. Up until about 1991, you could be like "sup doc, I wanna get big and muscular, give me some steroids" and that was it. They weren't controlled substances. So the unfortunate truth about those times was, well, lots of people were on drugs to attain the muscularity. Sylvester Stallone for example, recently (as in like 2 years ago?) got popped with HGH in Australia. He's still on drugs to this day to attain his muscularity.
IMO, the cultural trends sorta just favor different genetics. The old cultural trend favors the mesomorph and endomorph genetics, and the new one ectomorph. Going with feminism blah blah blah, I guess you can see sorta psychologically why. Bigger giant muscular dudes=unneeded by matriarchal society. Smaller dudes with abs=soft sensitive Edward from Twilight boy toy. I think this is how it works societally as in what is being pushed by the media or whatever.
Also, I think the whole skinny boy with abs thing is now more of a thing because of obesity. People who in an earlier time would not be obese are now obese. The only people left not obese who don't make it a hobby are usually the natural ectomorphs who tend to weigh 130lbs. So the whole somatotype thing might have something to do with media standards, too. All the naturally muscular dudes now have too big of a layer of fat covering their muscles now due to our modern environment with wonderful GMO foods and xenoestrogens and estrogen injected into the meat to make it cheap enough so we can live decadent as all hell for no reason (yep, meat has estradiol.)
In real life, people like whoever the hell. I don't think media standards really matter a whole lot. Or maybe it's just me and not really having even turned on a TV in months and having Adblock on. I'm inclined to think personally most girls probably would prefer a muscular guy, despite their opinions to the contrary. It's like big boobs and big butts. Sure, maybe some guys actually don't like them, but most guys do.
I don't think what you say is related to feminism so much as the diet industry. The modern diet makes people gain body fat but the modern aesthetic ideal derides bodyfat. That's not the matriarchy, that's just good business.
I've realised in this thread that I'm basically more into 'handsomeness' and intelligence than a particular body type. Endomorphy, ectomorph,etc don't matter much to me as long as a guy isn't obese.
_________________
Zombies, zombies will tear us apart...again.
puddingmouse wrote:
Greb wrote:
That's very related with facial structure. Check that both Jack Kerouac and Albert Camus have a similar one, and that's what you find attractive. They only need to avoid overweight to keep 'hotness'. The same with, I don't know, Grace Kelly. She wouldn't need daily gym to be attractive.
Take Pete Doherty that likes this kind of shots and you see it's all about facial structure. And this is genetic. Some people have a pretty/exotic/attractive face and other don't.
Pete Doherty doesn't have the right facial structure to pull it off in pictures, so I see what you mean. If he wrote better music and wasn't such a waster, he'd be more attractive, though. I think part of it is the personality and talent of the guy. Doherty's too much of a wannabe.
I guess I like a handsome face, what can I say? None of the men I've been with would be able to pull off a 50s smoking beatnik photo, so I reckon that's the power of personality at work.
Probably the black and white is a big responsible of it. All pics of Camus are in B/W, like this one:

I found one in colour, he looks well, but a good part of this 'aura' disappears:

_________________
1 part of Asperger | 1 part of OCD | 2 parts of ADHD / APD / GT-LD / 2e
And finally, another part of secret spices :^)
XFilesGeek wrote:
marshall wrote:

Sorry. Forgot the /sarcasm/ tags.
Okay. Sarcasm could still be accomplished with a slightly more realistic number of hours.
Quote:
I do all of those things and I still find time to work out.
When in the military, I was working 12 hour shifts, but I still ran 30 miles a week, and lifted weights three times a week for an hour. And I still had to cook, clean, run errands, ect. (but despite what Kurgan seems to think, I still didn't look like Kristen Steward (sp?) or whatever female tart is considered "hot" these days).
When in the military, I was working 12 hour shifts, but I still ran 30 miles a week, and lifted weights three times a week for an hour. And I still had to cook, clean, run errands, ect. (but despite what Kurgan seems to think, I still didn't look like Kristen Steward (sp?) or whatever female tart is considered "hot" these days).
I could do that if my life was 100% rote routine. Not while having to do things that stress out my brain or a typical job where I spend miserable hours on end standing around or sitting at a desk fighting the urge to nod off. I also need some free time where I'm not too tired to enjoy anything.
Quote:
My advice is, if you want to exercise, exercise because you want to get fit, not because you want to look a certain way.
I'm working out now because I want to be able to scramble/climb mountains. Like this I climbed last year.

IMG_2665_edit by marshallbs, on Flickr
XFilesGeek wrote:
I do all of those things and I still find time to work out.
A week has 168 hours. Everyone has time for exercise.
Quote:
When in the military, I was working 12 hour shifts, but I still ran 30 miles a week, and lifted weights three times a week for an hour. And I still had to cook, clean, run errands, ect. (but despite what Kurgan seems to think, I still didn't look like Kristen Steward (sp?) or whatever female tart is considered "hot" these days).
You were probably more muscular than her, though (if your diet was right, that is). To look like Kristen Stewart, you need genetics (mostly high estrogen levels and a small frame) and you need to be slim; no exercise is needed.
Everyone has a fixed number of calories needed to retain the body temperature. Go 200 calories below that everyday for 2-3 months and a women with 25% will be about as lean as she is.
Most men who workout like madmen and gain a sh!tload of muscle won't look like Zyzz or Dolph Lundgren either; they'll typically look like Zack Wylde or Thomas Hansvoll. The difference is, a man with excellent genetics for aestethics will still have to exercise like there's no tomorrow to live up to the pressure. Most aestetically pleasing muscle men have an ectomorphic build and would thus need steroids as well (everyone knows for a fact that this is what killed Zyzz).
Quote:
My advice is, if you want to exercise, exercise because you want to get fit, not because you want to look a certain way.
Depends on how you define fit. Few people think the day they finally buy a gym membership that in a year, they're gonna look just like everyone else who doesn't workout. 18" biceps is a bonus in my case; I lift to become stronger--this will increase lean mass automatically.
Last edited by Kurgan on 28 May 2013, 3:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
puddingmouse wrote:
We should just make the real world black and white for the same of sexiness.
Some of his aura might disappear with him smiling, too.
But if we banned smiling, I'd be damned.
Some of his aura might disappear with him smiling, too.

Yeap. Too bad. There should be a B/W official day every year!

Though seriously, a pity there's not more B/W movies. They have something special.
_________________
1 part of Asperger | 1 part of OCD | 2 parts of ADHD / APD / GT-LD / 2e
And finally, another part of secret spices :^)
Kurgan wrote:
Most men who workout like madmen and gain a sh!tload of muscle won't look like Zyzz or Dolph Lundgren either; they'll typically look like Zack Wylde or Thomas Hansvoll. The difference is, a man with excellent genetics for aestethics will still have to exercise like there's no tomorrow to live up to the pressure. Most aestetically pleasing muscle men have an ectomorphic build and would thus need steroids as well (everyone knows for a fact that this is what killed Zyzz).
I heard Zyzz was on coke, AND Trenbolone. Smart. Get a rec drug stimulant that massively raises blood pressure and pulse, and take it together with a steroid known for being the most aggressive of all steroids in the aspect of raising blood pressure/being horrible for you, and go in a sauna. I mean not that I think steroids are good, but to say "zomg roids killed Zyzz" is a bit stupid. Zyzz killed Zyzz. Also Zyzz was nuts and is rumored to have even used DNP to cut fat. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2,4-Dinitrophenol
But yes, bodybuilding is a weird basically anorexic thing taken to it's extreme end. People like to talk about things like "Little Girls in Tiny Boxes" regarding female weight issues, and certainly that's something to discuss. But I think ignoring men's issues like this and just saying "LOL GUYS STOP BEING A p**** AND TOUGHEN UP AND JUST BE CONFIDENT LOLOL" is bad. The male body image issues and routes they take to achieve said image is every bit as dangerous, if not more so, than girls starving themselves/etc (not that guys don't starve themselves whilst bodybuilding, all the guys on stage/in photoshoots are also dehydrated and pretty much on the verge of death.)
And this goes perfectly to Men's Rights. To diminish male problems like this and only play up female ones, on the news, in the media, etc, is bad. Is a man "weak" or a "loser" for being concerned about these issues, and "strong" if he goes and talks to people about how tragic it is girls are starving themselves eating like 500 calories a day trying to lose weight?
Tyri0n
Veteran

Joined: 24 Nov 2012
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,879
Location: Douchebag Capital of the World (aka Washington D.C.)
1000Knives wrote:
Kurgan wrote:
Most men who workout like madmen and gain a sh!tload of muscle won't look like Zyzz or Dolph Lundgren either; they'll typically look like Zack Wylde or Thomas Hansvoll. The difference is, a man with excellent genetics for aestethics will still have to exercise like there's no tomorrow to live up to the pressure. Most aestetically pleasing muscle men have an ectomorphic build and would thus need steroids as well (everyone knows for a fact that this is what killed Zyzz).
I heard Zyzz was on coke, AND Trenbolone. Smart. Get a rec drug stimulant that massively raises blood pressure and pulse, and take it together with a steroid known for being the most aggressive of all steroids in the aspect of raising blood pressure/being horrible for you, and go in a sauna. I mean not that I think steroids are good, but to say "zomg roids killed Zyzz" is a bit stupid. Zyzz killed Zyzz. Also Zyzz was nuts and is rumored to have even used DNP to cut fat. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2,4-Dinitrophenol
But yes, bodybuilding is a weird basically anorexic thing taken to it's extreme end. People like to talk about things like "Little Girls in Tiny Boxes" regarding female weight issues, and certainly that's something to discuss. But I think ignoring men's issues like this and just saying "LOL GUYS STOP BEING A p**** AND TOUGHEN UP AND JUST BE CONFIDENT LOLOL" is bad. The male body image issues and routes they take to achieve said image is every bit as dangerous, if not more so, than girls starving themselves/etc (not that guys don't starve themselves whilst bodybuilding, all the guys on stage/in photoshoots are also dehydrated and pretty much on the verge of death.)
And this goes perfectly to Men's Rights. To diminish male problems like this and only play up female ones, on the news, in the media, etc, is bad. Is a man "weak" or a "loser" for being concerned about these issues, and "strong" if he goes and talks to people about how tragic it is girls are starving themselves eating like 500 calories a day trying to lose weight?
Exactly. I totally agree. If MRA were about protecting men's rights, I'd be totally on board. Unfortunately, MRA is about attacking feminists, returning us to the Stone Age, and advocating male entitlement to women's bodies, not to mention Asian fetishes and rape threats. MRA is a misnomer for "scumbag."
I've been pestering Meems and several MRA friends of mine to find me a legitimate MRA group that is about men's rights rather than the things I mentioned. So far, none of them have been successful.
1000Knives wrote:
I heard Zyzz was on coke, AND Trenbolone. Smart. Get a rec drug stimulant that massively raises blood pressure and pulse, and take it together with a steroid known for being the most aggressive of all steroids in the aspect of raising blood pressure/being horrible for you, and go in a sauna. I mean not that I think steroids are good, but to say "zomg roids killed Zyzz" is a bit stupid. Zyzz killed Zyzz. Also Zyzz was nuts and is rumored to have even used DNP to cut fat. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2,4-Dinitrophenol
I never said that steroids automatically will kill you (they have their place in sports), but for a man with a scrawny build to look like Zyzz, lethal amounts of various drugs are needed.
Quote:
But yes, bodybuilding is a weird basically anorexic thing taken to it's extreme end. People like to talk about things like "Little Girls in Tiny Boxes" regarding female weight issues, and certainly that's something to discuss. But I think ignoring men's issues like this and just saying "LOL GUYS STOP BEING A p**** AND TOUGHEN UP AND JUST BE CONFIDENT LOLOL" is bad. The male body image issues and routes they take to achieve said image is every bit as dangerous, if not more so, than girls starving themselves/etc (not that guys don't starve themselves whilst bodybuilding, all the guys on stage/in photoshoots are also dehydrated and pretty much on the verge of death.)
And this goes perfectly to Men's Rights. To diminish male problems like this and only play up female ones, on the news, in the media, etc, is bad. Is a man "weak" or a "loser" for being concerned about these issues, and "strong" if he goes and talks to people about how tragic it is girls are starving themselves eating like 500 calories a day trying to lose weight?
And this goes perfectly to Men's Rights. To diminish male problems like this and only play up female ones, on the news, in the media, etc, is bad. Is a man "weak" or a "loser" for being concerned about these issues, and "strong" if he goes and talks to people about how tragic it is girls are starving themselves eating like 500 calories a day trying to lose weight?
Nobody said anorexia was a good thing. Few men and few women's magazines tell women that 500 calories a day and looking like a stick figure is the ideal either. Most of the female actresses you see aren't anorectic, nor are most female singers or reality show contestants.
Most women rated as the most attractive by Ask Men aren't undernourished, but are in the lower end of the ideal fat range.
1000Knives wrote:
Kurgan wrote:
Most men who workout like madmen and gain a sh!tload of muscle won't look like Zyzz or Dolph Lundgren either; they'll typically look like Zack Wylde or Thomas Hansvoll. The difference is, a man with excellent genetics for aestethics will still have to exercise like there's no tomorrow to live up to the pressure. Most aestetically pleasing muscle men have an ectomorphic build and would thus need steroids as well (everyone knows for a fact that this is what killed Zyzz).
I heard Zyzz was on coke, AND Trenbolone. Smart. Get a rec drug stimulant that massively raises blood pressure and pulse, and take it together with a steroid known for being the most aggressive of all steroids in the aspect of raising blood pressure/being horrible for you, and go in a sauna. I mean not that I think steroids are good, but to say "zomg roids killed Zyzz" is a bit stupid. Zyzz killed Zyzz. Also Zyzz was nuts and is rumored to have even used DNP to cut fat. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2,4-Dinitrophenol
But yes, bodybuilding is a weird basically anorexic thing taken to it's extreme end. People like to talk about things like "Little Girls in Tiny Boxes" regarding female weight issues, and certainly that's something to discuss. But I think ignoring men's issues like this and just saying "LOL GUYS STOP BEING A p**** AND TOUGHEN UP AND JUST BE CONFIDENT LOLOL" is bad. The male body image issues and routes they take to achieve said image is every bit as dangerous, if not more so, than girls starving themselves/etc (not that guys don't starve themselves whilst bodybuilding, all the guys on stage/in photoshoots are also dehydrated and pretty much on the verge of death.)
And this goes perfectly to Men's Rights. To diminish male problems like this and only play up female ones, on the news, in the media, etc, is bad. Is a man "weak" or a "loser" for being concerned about these issues, and "strong" if he goes and talks to people about how tragic it is girls are starving themselves eating like 500 calories a day trying to lose weight?
I would love their to be a more open discussion about men's body issues in the media and in society in general. I see it as important to the advancement of gender equality. I don't think of it as antagonistic to feminist or women's issues. Men and women have different issues but we can only work on them if people actually talk about them. I'm up for actively challenging the system that keeps men from discussing these things.
_________________
Zombies, zombies will tear us apart...again.
Kurgan wrote:
1000Knives wrote:
I heard Zyzz was on coke, AND Trenbolone. Smart. Get a rec drug stimulant that massively raises blood pressure and pulse, and take it together with a steroid known for being the most aggressive of all steroids in the aspect of raising blood pressure/being horrible for you, and go in a sauna. I mean not that I think steroids are good, but to say "zomg roids killed Zyzz" is a bit stupid. Zyzz killed Zyzz. Also Zyzz was nuts and is rumored to have even used DNP to cut fat. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2,4-Dinitrophenol
I never said that steroids automatically will kill you (they have their place in sports), but for a man with a scrawny build to look like Zyzz, lethal amounts of various drugs are needed.
Quote:
But yes, bodybuilding is a weird basically anorexic thing taken to it's extreme end. People like to talk about things like "Little Girls in Tiny Boxes" regarding female weight issues, and certainly that's something to discuss. But I think ignoring men's issues like this and just saying "LOL GUYS STOP BEING A p**** AND TOUGHEN UP AND JUST BE CONFIDENT LOLOL" is bad. The male body image issues and routes they take to achieve said image is every bit as dangerous, if not more so, than girls starving themselves/etc (not that guys don't starve themselves whilst bodybuilding, all the guys on stage/in photoshoots are also dehydrated and pretty much on the verge of death.)
And this goes perfectly to Men's Rights. To diminish male problems like this and only play up female ones, on the news, in the media, etc, is bad. Is a man "weak" or a "loser" for being concerned about these issues, and "strong" if he goes and talks to people about how tragic it is girls are starving themselves eating like 500 calories a day trying to lose weight?
And this goes perfectly to Men's Rights. To diminish male problems like this and only play up female ones, on the news, in the media, etc, is bad. Is a man "weak" or a "loser" for being concerned about these issues, and "strong" if he goes and talks to people about how tragic it is girls are starving themselves eating like 500 calories a day trying to lose weight?
Nobody said anorexia was a good thing. Few men and few women's magazines tell women that 500 calories a day and looking like a stick figure is the ideal either. Most of the female actresses you see aren't anorectic, nor are most female singers or reality show contestants.
Most women rated as the most attractive by Ask Men aren't undernourished, but are in the lower end of the ideal fat range.
Regarding the 500 cal a day thing, you're correct in that it's extreme, but so is taking DNP or trenbolone. Most mainstream people will not recommend such things, but people take them anyway in pursuit of an ideal.
marshall wrote:
I could do that if my life was 100% rote routine. Not while having to do things that stress out my brain or a typical job where I spend miserable hours on end standing around or sitting at a desk fighting the urge to nod off. I also need some free time where I'm not too tired to enjoy anything.
I wish my life was rote routine......
Quote:
I'm working out now because I want to be able to scramble/climb mountains. Like this I climbed last year.
A very good reason to exercise. Good luck to you.
Quote:
You were probably more muscular than her, though (if your diet was right, that is).
No.
Quote:
To look like Kristen Stewart, you need genetics (mostly high estrogen levels and a small frame) and you need to be slim; no exercise is needed.
The majority of women need to exercise to look like Kristen Steward.
Quote:
The difference is, a man with excellent genetics for aestethics will still have to exercise like there's no tomorrow to live up to the pressure. Most aestetically pleasing muscle men have an ectomorphic build and would thus need steroids as well (everyone knows for a fact that this is what killed Zyzz).
Not even remotely accurate.
_________________
"If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced."
-XFG (no longer a moderator)
puddingmouse wrote:
The women in this list would probably be harassed for being masculine: http://www.afterellen.com/people/2007/7 ... page=1%2C0
But they are actually very attractive not at all ugly. Gender stereotypes again.
But they are actually very attractive not at all ugly. Gender stereotypes again.
Wow, first time I've ever felt a little bit of zing towards women. Thanks for the link - new experiences are good!
Greb wrote:
puddingmouse wrote:
Those are just two people. When I get harassed it's not because I look ugly because I don't really - I'm quite well-groomed and have an attractive face. I get harassed because I'm not dressing or acting in a typically feminine way - that's due to gender stereotypes. If a guy gets made fun of if he takes off his shirt and is not muscular, or if he's wearing a floral shirt or whatever, then he's a victim of gender stereotypes, too.
This is not about gender. If you look different from most of the people in your group, you get harassed. If you're a woman dressing as a man, you get harassed. If you're a WASP dressing as a gangsta bro, you get harassed. If you're 60 years old and you're dressing as a teenager, you get harassed. If you live in our decade and you dress as you lived in 70s, you get harassed. If you go out to a Pub a Friday night and you dress as you were in Hawaii, you get harassed. If you walk naked in the promenade, you get harassed. If you use a plantpot as a hat, you get harassed.
This is not about f***ing genders. I'm sorry, but the world doesn't rotate around women that don't care to look feminine enough.
Nor does it rotate around people who own ferrets in California (where it is illegal), and yet there are people who have PACs and action groups advocating for people who own ferrets in California. The fact that a movement does not encompass everyone does not make the movement illegitimate.
Kurgan wrote:
If the female beauty standards were as demanding as male beatury standards (i.e. any Hollywood woman had to workout as hard as Hugh Jackman does), pretty much any woman in any lightly dressed role would look like a bikini fitness woman (the 21. century one, that is, not the 1990's one). If standards were "fair", Spartacus would be filled with actors with mediocre amounts of lean mass and 12-14% body fat.
*snort* And if male body standards were as strict as female ones, Hugh Jackman would have to starve himself until he was having heart palpitations due to malnutrition.