Jacoby wrote:
zer0netgain wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
I don't want to read thru 27 pages, has the Texas abortion law been discussed? If not, then maybe that could warrant its own thread since I think it is an interesting discussion.
It's much ado about nothing.
Other states have as strict, or stricter, laws on the books and you see nothing being done about that or those laws being decried as a horrible affront to women's rights.
It's pretty hilarious considering left wingers are essentially admitting regulation kills industry. The abortion industry is actually in desperate need of regulation in light of the fact that is more dangerous getting an abortion than giving birth and the disgusting Kermit Gosnell case. You have this idiots in Texas walking around with used tampons and jugs of piss to throw at people, they should look at themselves in the mirror sometimes and realize that they're own worst enemy. I can't help but laugh, the foaming at the mouth left made did the same thing in Wisconsin when it came to the new collective bargaining law. Democracy in action people.
Your data are not reflective of reality.
First, the 'regulations' you are descirbing are specifically designed to shut down abortion providers, not to make them safer; second, abortions are actually about ten times safer than giving birth. Third, Gosnell was the equivalent of a back-alley abortionist, taking women who could not afford to go through regular channels or who had been denied regular channels for one reason or another; if safe, legal abortion is restricted, you can expect to see more cases like him, not fewer.