Atheism and Satanism

Post Reply New Topic

What is this action then

Yeah the game matrix for that one would be huge

Because you say it is profound does not make it profound. It approaches a phenomenon from an angle that assumes its profundity without the understanding to propose the right questions to investigate the phenomenon. Philosophy frequently mistakes the structure of language for the structure of reality and ties itself into stupid knots over non-existent problems.

Stephen Hawking has been regarded by some as an advocate of modern postivism, at least in the physical sciences. In The Universe in a Nutshell (p. 31) he writes:

Any sound scientific theory, whether of time or of any other concept, should in my opinion be based on the most workable philosophy of science: the positivist approach put forward by Friedrich Hayek and Karl Popper and others. According to this way of thinking, a scientific theory is a mathematical model that describes and codifies the observations we make. A good theory will describe a large range of phenomena on the basis of a few simple postulates and will make definite predictions that can be tested… If one takes the positivist position, as I do, one cannot say what time actually is. All one can do is describe what has been found to be a very good mathematical model for time and say what predictions it makes

I sincerely doubt that Hawking's approach to reality is, as you more or less stated no longer accepted as useful.

Human awareness insofar as I experience it consists of the construction of a virtual universe within my mind which is continuously modified by my sense input. Naturally my sense input is selective as it is impossible to contain all the data possible that could come in and it is sure that each of us, depending upon our genetics and our experience, constructs a slightly different internal virtual universe. Nevertheless sufficient agreement amongst the various internal virtual universes permits rational social interaction. Humans tend to assign only to themselves this awareness which they label consciousness but vital elements in this system are necessary for any life form to sustain itself so every living thing has a form of consciousness in order to survive. Even plants which must be structured to be aware of gravity, wind pressures, light and dark, have some sense of their surroundings but it is improbable that they construct the complex sense of self that humans call consciousness. Psychological tests with mirrors indicate that great apes, elephants, dolphins, crows and magpies have a sense of self and it is likely that this "consciousness" is far more widely distributed than most humans will admit.

And what gives you confidence in that belief?

It's rather depressing that whenever rational analysis bumps up against a problem that might be somewhat puzzling some previously sensible people start screaming GOD or SUPERNATURAL and curl up into fetal positions.

Goodness how you do love the inscrutability of things. Consciousness is a system aware of its surroundings and aware of itself as part of its surroundings. Big deal!