kouzoku wrote:
ArrantPariah wrote:
Shatbat wrote:
They'd also not think of two lesbians as two people who love each other, but as two objects whose purpose is to kiss each other for the benefit of any guys that might be watching.
The two are not mutually exclusive.

One thing you don't seem to grasp is that people aren't objects.
Merriam Webster wrote:
1 a: something material that may be perceived by the senses <I see an object in the distance>
b: something that when viewed stirs a particular emotion (as pity) <look to the tragic loading of this bed … the object poisons sight; let it be hid — Shakespeare>
2 a: something mental or physical toward which thought, feeling, or action is directed <an object for study> <the object of my affection> <delicately carved art objects>
b: something physical that is perceived by an individual and becomes an agent for psychological identification <the mother is the primary object of the child>
3 a: the goal or end of an effort or activity : purpose, objective <their object is to investigate the matter thoroughly>
b: a cause for attention or concern <money is no object>
4: a thing that forms an element of or constitutes the subject matter of an investigation or science
5 a: a noun or noun equivalent (as a pronoun, gerund, or clause) denoting the goal or result of the action of a verb
b: a noun or noun equivalent in a prepositional phrase
6 a: a data structure in object-oriented programming that can contain functions as well as data, variables, and other data structures
b: a discrete entity (as a window or icon) in computer graphics that can be manipulated independently of other such entities
The definition of the noun "object" does not exclude people, however much some people might object.
People are material, and can be perceived by the senses.
Definition 2 even includes a person as an example of an object.
At the risk of being spanked for sexism once again: people do constitute a subset of objects.