Board index › Topical Discussion › Politics, Philosophy, and Religion

Final Vote for Atheistic Stridency

Page 4 of 6 [ 89 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

Previous topic | Next topic

Who is the most stridently atheistic and/or antireligious member of Wrong Planet?
Poll ended at 09 Jun 2010, 10:05 pm
First Choice: Awesomelyglorious Second Choice: Sand 29%  29%  [ 9 ]
First Choice: Awesomelyglorious Second Choice: ruveyn 13%  13%  [ 4 ]
First Choice: Awesomelyglorious Second Choice: DentArthurDent 10%  10%  [ 3 ]
First Choice: Sand Second Choice: Awesomelyglorious 10%  10%  [ 3 ]
First Choice: Sand Second Choice: ruveyn 16%  16%  [ 5 ]
First Choice: Sand Second Choice: DentArthurDent 10%  10%  [ 3 ]
First Choice: ruveyn Second Choice: Awesomelyglorious 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
First Choice: ruveyn Second Choice: Sand 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
First Choice: ruveyn Second Choice: DentArthurDent 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
First Choice: DentArthurDent Second Choice: Awesomelyglorious 6%  6%  [ 2 ]
First Choice: DentArthurDent Second Choice: Sand 6%  6%  [ 2 ]
First Choice: DentArthurDent Second Choice: ruveyn 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Total votes : 31

Master_Pedant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Mar 2009
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,903

06 Jun 2010, 11:09 pm

Awesomelyglorious wrote:
Master_Pedant wrote:
Awesomelyglorious, is there anything you don't consider Platonism?! :tongue:

No. Thought is Platonistic. The way to oppose Platonism is to oppose everything. I try to do exactly that. :P :wink:


Then is nominalism Platonistic?! ! 8O



Awesomelyglorious
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,157
Location: Omnipresent

06 Jun 2010, 11:30 pm

Master_Pedant wrote:
Then is nominalism Platonistic?! ! 8O

Way too Platonistic.



Master_Pedant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Mar 2009
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,903

06 Jun 2010, 11:42 pm

One the plus side, I need only five more votes for my voter turnout goal (30 people) to be realized.

I must compliment you, Sand had a pretty tigh lead at the start of this campaign and you blew him out of the water, so to speak.



Awesomelyglorious
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,157
Location: Omnipresent

06 Jun 2010, 11:55 pm

Master_Pedant wrote:
I must compliment you, Sand had a pretty tigh lead at the start of this campaign and you blew him out of the water, so to speak.

I am a testament to what a good propaganda campaign can do to democracy.



AngelRho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jan 2008
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,366
Location: The Landmass between N.O. and Mobile

07 Jun 2010, 10:13 am

AG opposes EVERYTHING. That necessarily includes his own opposition of his opposition. Hell is certainly about to break forth, as AG has made a self-defeating statement.

All that is left now, AG, is for you to tell your voters NOT to vote for you!
:lol:



Awesomelyglorious
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,157
Location: Omnipresent

07 Jun 2010, 10:47 am

AngelRho wrote:
AG opposes EVERYTHING. That necessarily includes his own opposition of his opposition. Hell is certainly about to break forth, as AG has made a self-defeating statement.

Why would hell break forth? If I am illogical enough to make a self-defeating statement, then I am illogical enough to ignore that fact or even only invoke it when I feel like it. :P That being said, I think it is obvious I am just being utterly ridiculous.



Orwell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Aug 2007
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,518
Location: Room 101

07 Jun 2010, 4:55 pm

DentArthurDent wrote:
Damn my bungling fingers I just voted first choice AG second choice Dent, I intended 1st Sand 2nd Dent, unlike AG I am not a narcissist

Hanging chads! The ballot was too difficult for voters to understand! AG had preferential placement at the top of the ballot. This is clearly a biased, unfair election, and the results cannot be allowed to stand as they are when clearly many of the people who voted AG did so mistakenly when they really intended to vote STRIDENTLY for Dent.


_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH


Awesomelyglorious
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,157
Location: Omnipresent

07 Jun 2010, 5:17 pm

Orwell wrote:
DentArthurDent wrote:
Damn my bungling fingers I just voted first choice AG second choice Dent, I intended 1st Sand 2nd Dent, unlike AG I am not a narcissist

Hanging chads! The ballot was too difficult for voters to understand! AG had preferential placement at the top of the ballot. This is clearly a biased, unfair election, and the results cannot be allowed to stand as they are when clearly many of the people who voted AG did so mistakenly when they really intended to vote STRIDENTLY for Dent.

You mean that it is too difficult for Dent to understand. Look, do we want an idiot being our representative of STRIDENT atheism? Even further, shouldn't we expect this kind of error from a Marxist anyway? I mean, it takes a certain level of... well... y'know, mental difficulties to subscribe to a thoroughly debunked 19th century philosophy. Whether Dent wants to recognize it or not, any objective historian knows that Dent's idol Stalin didn't do good things to the Russian people.



Master_Pedant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Mar 2009
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,903

07 Jun 2010, 10:35 pm

Orwell wrote:
DentArthurDent wrote:
Damn my bungling fingers I just voted first choice AG second choice Dent, I intended 1st Sand 2nd Dent, unlike AG I am not a narcissist

Hanging chads! The ballot was too difficult for voters to understand! AG had preferential placement at the top of the ballot. This is clearly a biased, unfair election, and the results cannot be allowed to stand as they are when clearly many of the people who voted AG did so mistakenly when they really intended to vote STRIDENTLY for Dent.


Are you saying I should have randomly scrambled the choices? I ranked them in the order of poll victories (with a slight bias to AG even though he was tied to Sand). Dent was my preferred candidate and so far I am the only guy or gal to give him a first choice voite.

I engineered this system against my own candidate?



sartresue
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Age: 71
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,313
Location: The Castle of Shock and Awe-tism

08 Jun 2010, 10:21 am

Ballot ballyhoo topic

WP rejected my choice in that it did not input my vote. :P

Taking this all in stride. :lol:

Update: It allowed my vote after a second try. Conspiracy? :wink:


_________________
Radiant Aspergian
Awe-Tistic Whirlwind

Phuture Phounder of the Philosophy Phactory

NOT a believer of Mystic Woo-Woo


Master_Pedant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Mar 2009
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,903

08 Jun 2010, 8:34 pm

http://www.elsewhere.org/pomo/

^ Do we want people whose thoughs are equivalent to quasi-randomly generated nonsense representing atheistic stridency?

VOTE DENT #1 - LET'S MAKE SURE DENT MAKES A DENT IN THE VOTE!

This message has been paid for and authorized by Concerned Atheistic Netizens for Dent.



Awesomelyglorious
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,157
Location: Omnipresent

08 Jun 2010, 8:47 pm

Master_Pedant wrote:
http://www.elsewhere.org/pomo/

^ Do we want people whose thoughs are equivalent to quasi-randomly generated nonsense representing atheistic stridency?

VOTE DENT #1 - LET'S MAKE SURE DENT MAKES A DENT IN THE VOTE!

This message has been paid for and authorized by Concerned Atheistic Netizens for Dent.

My thoughs AREN'T equivalent to quasi-randomly generated nonsense. My thoughts might be, but not my thoughs!!

Even further, I think everybody knows I am much more awesome. I mean, how do we know I am awesome? I am winning. And because I am winning, I am awesome. And because I am awesome, you should vote for me. It is that simple!

Heck, the strategies all attributed to Dent aren't even original. It seems that Dent only has dead ideas. Really though, I am awesome, and I am glorious, both of which are traits we NEED from an atheist candidate.



Master_Pedant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Mar 2009
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,903

08 Jun 2010, 9:30 pm

Awesomelyglorious wrote:
Master_Pedant wrote:
http://www.elsewhere.org/pomo/

^ Do we want people whose thoughs are equivalent to quasi-randomly generated nonsense representing atheistic stridency?

VOTE DENT #1 - LET'S MAKE SURE DENT MAKES A DENT IN THE VOTE!

This message has been paid for and authorized by Concerned Atheistic Netizens for Dent.

My thoughs AREN'T equivalent to quasi-randomly generated nonsense. My thoughts might be, but not my thoughs!!

Even further, I think everybody knows I am much more awesome. I mean, how do we know I am awesome? I am winning. And because I am winning, I am awesome. And because I am awesome, you should vote for me. It is that simple!

Heck, the strategies all attributed to Dent aren't even original. It seems that Dent only has dead ideas. Really though, I am awesome, and I am glorious, both of which are traits we NEED from an atheist candidate.


Dent clearly is more awesome, since he has two distinct campaigns trying to draft him! :twisted:



Awesomelyglorious
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,157
Location: Omnipresent

08 Jun 2010, 9:32 pm

Master_Pedant wrote:
Dent clearly is more awesome, since he has two distinct campaigns trying to draft him! :twisted:

No he doesn't. He has one madman on a religious crusade to make a man of a discredited faith into our most strident atheist as well as the payroll of swarms of Mormons.

If we are to select Dent, then why not a Muslim???



Master_Pedant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Mar 2009
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,903

08 Jun 2010, 9:34 pm

Awesomelyglorious wrote:
Master_Pedant wrote:
Dent clearly is more awesome, since he has two distinct campaigns trying to draft him! :twisted:

No he doesn't. He has one madman on a religious crusade to make a man of a discredited faith into our most strident atheist as well as the payroll of swarms of Mormons.

If we are to select Dent, then why not a Muslim???


There may be only one user willing to post the statments of the indepedent committees, but rest assured that there are two committees each with 0.5 people.



Sand
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Age: 100
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,484
Location: Finland

08 Jun 2010, 9:35 pm

Awesomelyglorious wrote:
Master_Pedant wrote:
Dent clearly is more awesome, since he has two distinct campaigns trying to draft him! :twisted:

No he doesn't. He has one madman on a religious crusade to make a man of a discredited faith into our most strident atheist as well as the payroll of swarms of Mormons.

If we are to select Dent, then why not a Muslim???


Why are you so sure Dent isn't a Muslim? He could be very devious.