Isaiah 7:14 and the Virginity of Mary, the Mother of Jesus

Page 4 of 4 [ 63 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4


Did Isaiah 7:14 accurately predict the mother of Jesus to be a virgin?
Isaiah nailed it! 17%  17%  [ 2 ]
Well, maybe 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
It was just an odd coincidence 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Absolutely not! 50%  50%  [ 6 ]
Just show the results 33%  33%  [ 4 ]
Total votes : 12

ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 122
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

09 Jul 2012, 9:26 am

Resurrected for the benefits of Joker and AngelRho.



Delphiki
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2012
Age: 183
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,415
Location: My own version of reality

09 Jul 2012, 9:34 am

ArrantPariah wrote:
Resurrected for the benefits of Joker and AngelRho.
Joker was banned...


_________________
Well you can go with that if you want.


ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 122
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

09 Jul 2012, 10:07 am

Delphiki wrote:
ArrantPariah wrote:
Resurrected for the benefits of Joker and AngelRho.
Joker was banned...


Huh? Well, that was mysterious. We were just having a conversation relevant to this topic, and I thought that he would like to read some of the previous discussions.

Oh well, topic resurrected for the benefit of anyone interested, then. We were going down the Isaiah 7:14 path again, and rather than grasping at the same straws all over again (with some members who are newer and hadn't previously participated in similar debates), I thought that this would help the discussion, and bring everyone up to the same page.



Touretter
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 18 Mar 2006
Age: 43
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 412

09 Jul 2012, 2:19 pm

Almah refers to maiden. Betulah is the Hebrew word for virgin. http://www.outreachjudaism.org/articles/alma-virgin.html So the writers of the Septuigent really blew it, when they mistranslated the Hebrew scriptures into Greek. But as the Septuigent seems to affirm conventional Christian doctrines, such as the immaculate conception, Christians continue to use it.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

09 Jul 2012, 3:47 pm

Touretter wrote:
Almah refers to maiden. Betulah is the Hebrew word for virgin. http://www.outreachjudaism.org/articles/alma-virgin.html So the writers of the Septuigent really blew it, when they mistranslated the Hebrew scriptures into Greek. But as the Septuigent seems to affirm conventional Christian doctrines, such as the immaculate conception, Christians continue to use it.


They didn't blow it exactly. The Greek language did not have an exact word for -almah- so the word portenos (virgin) was substituted. And now you know the REST of the story!

ruveyn



YippySkippy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Feb 2011
Age: 45
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,986

09 Jul 2012, 4:16 pm

A lot of the Bible has been lost/changed in translation. Who knows whether Isaiah originally read "maiden" or "virgin"? Back then, a maiden was presumed to be a virgin anyway, so the use of "maiden" might have been meant to imply "virgin".

At any rate, I think the only important reason to state that Mary was a virgin is that it rules out Joseph or any other man as a possible father. It's just a way of trying to establish paternity.



ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 122
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

09 Jul 2012, 4:23 pm

YippySkippy wrote:
A lot of the Bible has been lost/changed in translation. Who knows whether Isaiah originally read "maiden" or "virgin"? Back then, a maiden was presumed to be a virgin anyway, so the use of "maiden" might have been meant to imply "virgin".

At any rate, I think the only important reason to state that Mary was a virgin is that it rules out Joseph or any other man as a possible father. It's just a way of trying to establish paternity.


BUT, the genealogies of two of the gospels point to Joseph.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

09 Jul 2012, 4:26 pm

YippySkippy wrote:
A lot of the Bible has been lost/changed in translation. Who knows whether Isaiah originally read "maiden" or "virgin"? Back then, a maiden was presumed to be a virgin anyway, so the use of "maiden" might have been meant to imply "virgin".



Not in Hebrew. There is a word meaning a young woman of marriageable age and another word meaning virgin.

ruveyn



YippySkippy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Feb 2011
Age: 45
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,986

10 Jul 2012, 9:15 am

Quote:
BUT, the genealogies of two of the gospels point to Joseph.


I don't know what verses you're referencing.


Quote:
Not in Hebrew. There is a word meaning a young woman of marriageable age and another word meaning virgin.


Young women who weren't virgins weren't usually marriage material, though. The fact that Mary was engaged implies that she was either a virgin, or at least thought to be one.



Vigilans
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2008
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,181
Location: Montreal

10 Jul 2012, 9:57 am

Image


_________________
Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do


ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 122
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

10 Jul 2012, 10:07 am

Vigilans wrote:
Image


:lmao:



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

10 Jul 2012, 10:09 am

Vigilans wrote:
Image


You realize, don't you, that you are going to burn in Hell for eternity?

ruveyn



ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 122
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

10 Jul 2012, 10:17 am

ruveyn wrote:
You realize, don't you, that you are going to burn in Hell for eternity?

ruveyn


I see that AngelRho has finally converted Ruveyn. :wink:



Pyrite
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Mar 2012
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,247
Location: Mid-Atlantic United States

10 Jul 2012, 7:08 pm

I don't get the basis for the assumption of foreshadowing and hidden meanings.

What would the wording have to look like for there to be no doubt that it applied only to the matter at hand and not simultaneously making a second prophecy?

It's not as if it could have included a disclaimer saying "does not refer to Mary and Jesus", since that would amount to an explicit prophecy.


_________________
AQ 40. EQ 10/SQ 92. AS 184/NT 18. dx.


ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 122
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

14 Jul 2012, 10:37 am

Pyrite wrote:
I don't get the basis for the assumption of foreshadowing and hidden meanings.

What would the wording have to look like for there to be no doubt that it applied only to the matter at hand and not simultaneously making a second prophecy?

It's not as if it could have included a disclaimer saying "does not refer to Mary and Jesus", since that would amount to an explicit prophecy.


The wording would be as it is, but without the mistranslations into Greek and subsequent languages.