I don't like Cameron or his politics BUT on this point I would have to defend him.
There are plenty of people in nations that used to be a part of the British empire that justifiably have a feeling of resentment for what was done to them personally or to members of their family.
Acknowledging that fact and apologising for the bad things that we did is good ethics and very good politics, it costs us nothing but a delusion of grandeur and delivers relief to people who still bear the mental scars from the wounds we inflicted.
Good on him.
I'm not an empire lover or hater, we invented concentration camps during the second Boer War, we did seriously nasty things to the Mau Mau in Kenya which is why Obama has a serious beef with having a bust of Churchill in his office. The Irish were rightly pissed off that during the potato famine food exports to England continued.
Try reading through this blog from Adam Curtis to see one of the more unpleasant things about Empire that we have conveniently swept under the carpet.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/adamcurtis/2 ... r_one.html
Quote:
The tone of the BBC programme is of its time. It is determined also to show the dark side of the British Empire, the horrific acts of cruelty ordered by the British high command. It is saying - we may have lost an empire but we have become better people, and such horrors will never happen again.
At the end of the film is a scene showing how the British would tie Indian rebels to cannon muzzles and blow them to pieces. But a few years ago that section was edited out and you have to get special permission to show it. Things had changed again.
It is very horrific and absolutely not for the squeamish, but if you want to have a look at it - here it is.
But that said, when the British ruled Rhodesia it was the envy of Africa. It had the best health service, education and infrastructure in Africa, it was Africa's largest food exporter. Today the only thing Zimbabwe exports is cholera, typhoid and refuges. Our troops are back in Sierra Leone, not because we invaded them with nouveau-imperialist intentions but because they begged us for help to bring peace to their country which had been torn apart by civil war.
I haven't met an Afghan yet that didn't want the British and Americans in Afghan. Ok, I've only ever met Afghans in Britain so that may affect their publicly expressed opinion, but I was talking to an Afghan guy a few weeks ago, I said I could understand the Taliban killing soldiers that are occupying your country but I couldn't understand wasting explosives on brand new schools that the enemy had built in your country killing your own children instead of on the enemy.
His reply was quite interesting, a lot of foreign aid pours into Afghanistan for development work, there are three ways to spend it.
1. Give it to the local warlord who will steal it and not build anything.
2. Build it yourself and pay the local warlord ten times the construction cost to not blow it up.
3. Build it yourself, don't pay the right warlord who will then come and blow it up.
He was totally in favour of us doing the job properly - killing Karzai and importing lots of British people to run the country.
And they call autistic people nuts...