AceOfSpades wrote:
Yeah I guess watching porn substitutes doing it for real

.
It is only YOU who is asserting personal experience of a phenomena is needed to explain its mechanisms, so this is a circular....comment.
In any case, a holistic view of human sexuality would require general knowledge in psychology, gender studies, biology, and more.
(Oh, and equating sex with porn is like equating food with McDonald's.)
AceOfSpades wrote:
Sitting back and analyzing something is much different from living it. A controlled environment allows you to see things as they are more reductively, but it will not give you the subtle cues you pick up on from living in an uncontrolled environment which allows you to see the bigger picture.
The exact opposite, actually.
Personal experiences are exactly that-personal, and devoid of any academic understanding of the themes involved apart from the personal feelings they happen to provoke.
"The bigger picture" is necessarily only seen by someone
outside a situation- an impartial observer.
AceOfSpades wrote:
Bethie wrote:
Science fail.
Huh?
You fail at science, if you assert (rolling with your example) banging X number of chicks is
remotely, dimensionally as authoritative when making assertions about sex as a whole as peer-reviewed cross-discipline research.
_________________
For there is another kind of violence, slower but just as deadly, destructive as the shot or the bomb in the night. This is the violence of institutions; indifference and inaction and slow decay.