Has anyone here ever done Rick Perry?
Master_Pedant wrote:
Orwell wrote:
Weiner sent out some flirtatious e-mails and a picture of himself in his underwear, and it was all the media could talk about for weeks, leading to him being forced out of Congress. Vitter was sleeping with hookers (which, unlike salacious e-mails, is actually a crime in this country) and it was a complete non-story. Not only did he not resign his office, but he didn't even have the decency to step down at the end of his term and the Republican party supported him to re-election.
With the exception of certain parts of Nevada.
He didn't do it in Nevada. Vitter broke the law; Weiner did not. And yet Weiner was the one who took a political fall. This is sufficient to refute any notions that the Democrats are given a free ride by the media on their alleged immorality.
_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH
By the way, the whores are already preparing themselves for the next Republican convention.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/09/0 ... .html?href
Orwell wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
pandabear wrote:
techstepgenr8tion wrote:
Dox47 wrote:
What is it with you and gay innuendo about republicans, panda? I mean its fine if that's what you're into, but shouldn't these posts be in the adult section, or perhaps on craigslist?
Maybe they just authentically get him hot. I suppose there's fetishes every which way in this day and age.
We are discussing authentic political issues--Republicans are libidinous maniacs who should not serve in government. There needs to be a formal separation of filth and State.
It wouldn't surprise me if the Democrats are doing far worse and the lamestream media is simply ignoring it. Furthermore, considering the left's tendency to fabricate "evidence" it wouldn't surprise me if Rick Perry isn't as tied to this as they are trying to lead us to believe.
Weiner sent out some flirtatious e-mails and a picture of himself in his underwear, and it was all the media could talk about for weeks, leading to him being forced out of Congress. Vitter was sleeping with hookers (which, unlike salacious e-mails, is actually a crime in this country) and it was a complete non-story. Not only did he not resign his office, but he didn't even have the decency to step down at the end of his term and the Republican party supported him to re-election.
Uh Orwell, from what I heard from multiple sources, is that apparently Weiner was sending pictures to underage girls where he wasn't wearing underwear.
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
Inuyasha wrote:
Orwell wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
pandabear wrote:
techstepgenr8tion wrote:
Dox47 wrote:
What is it with you and gay innuendo about republicans, panda? I mean its fine if that's what you're into, but shouldn't these posts be in the adult section, or perhaps on craigslist?
Maybe they just authentically get him hot. I suppose there's fetishes every which way in this day and age.
We are discussing authentic political issues--Republicans are libidinous maniacs who should not serve in government. There needs to be a formal separation of filth and State.
It wouldn't surprise me if the Democrats are doing far worse and the lamestream media is simply ignoring it. Furthermore, considering the left's tendency to fabricate "evidence" it wouldn't surprise me if Rick Perry isn't as tied to this as they are trying to lead us to believe.
Weiner sent out some flirtatious e-mails and a picture of himself in his underwear, and it was all the media could talk about for weeks, leading to him being forced out of Congress. Vitter was sleeping with hookers (which, unlike salacious e-mails, is actually a crime in this country) and it was a complete non-story. Not only did he not resign his office, but he didn't even have the decency to step down at the end of his term and the Republican party supported him to re-election.
Uh Orwell, from what I heard from multiple sources, is that apparently Weiner was sending pictures to underage girls where he wasn't wearing underwear.
Was that ever verified that he was sending his pictures to underage girls?
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Kraichgauer wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Orwell wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
pandabear wrote:
techstepgenr8tion wrote:
Dox47 wrote:
What is it with you and gay innuendo about republicans, panda? I mean its fine if that's what you're into, but shouldn't these posts be in the adult section, or perhaps on craigslist?
Maybe they just authentically get him hot. I suppose there's fetishes every which way in this day and age.
We are discussing authentic political issues--Republicans are libidinous maniacs who should not serve in government. There needs to be a formal separation of filth and State.
It wouldn't surprise me if the Democrats are doing far worse and the lamestream media is simply ignoring it. Furthermore, considering the left's tendency to fabricate "evidence" it wouldn't surprise me if Rick Perry isn't as tied to this as they are trying to lead us to believe.
Weiner sent out some flirtatious e-mails and a picture of himself in his underwear, and it was all the media could talk about for weeks, leading to him being forced out of Congress. Vitter was sleeping with hookers (which, unlike salacious e-mails, is actually a crime in this country) and it was a complete non-story. Not only did he not resign his office, but he didn't even have the decency to step down at the end of his term and the Republican party supported him to re-election.
Uh Orwell, from what I heard from multiple sources, is that apparently Weiner was sending pictures to underage girls where he wasn't wearing underwear.
Was that ever verified that he was sending his pictures to underage girls?
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
It was investigated and no wrongdoing on Weiner's part was found. And as far as I know, there were never even allegations of completely nude pictures being involved. That one is just a product of Inuyasha's fevered imagination.
Here are the facts: Weiner acted foolishly. Vitter acted criminally. Only Weiner had to face any consequences, while Vitter got off scot free.
_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH
Orwell wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Orwell wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
pandabear wrote:
techstepgenr8tion wrote:
Dox47 wrote:
What is it with you and gay innuendo about republicans, panda? I mean its fine if that's what you're into, but shouldn't these posts be in the adult section, or perhaps on craigslist?
Maybe they just authentically get him hot. I suppose there's fetishes every which way in this day and age.
We are discussing authentic political issues--Republicans are libidinous maniacs who should not serve in government. There needs to be a formal separation of filth and State.
It wouldn't surprise me if the Democrats are doing far worse and the lamestream media is simply ignoring it. Furthermore, considering the left's tendency to fabricate "evidence" it wouldn't surprise me if Rick Perry isn't as tied to this as they are trying to lead us to believe.
Weiner sent out some flirtatious e-mails and a picture of himself in his underwear, and it was all the media could talk about for weeks, leading to him being forced out of Congress. Vitter was sleeping with hookers (which, unlike salacious e-mails, is actually a crime in this country) and it was a complete non-story. Not only did he not resign his office, but he didn't even have the decency to step down at the end of his term and the Republican party supported him to re-election.
Uh Orwell, from what I heard from multiple sources, is that apparently Weiner was sending pictures to underage girls where he wasn't wearing underwear.
Was that ever verified that he was sending his pictures to underage girls?
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
It was investigated and no wrongdoing on Weiner's part was found. And as far as I know, there were never even allegations of completely nude pictures being involved. That one is just a product of Inuyasha's fevered imagination.
Here are the facts: Weiner acted foolishly. Vitter acted criminally. Only Weiner had to face any consequences, while Vitter got off scot free.
The nude pictures to women was verified, the one to underage girls (as far as we know) have not been verified.
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/police-inves ... ware-girl/
As many people here have claimed, people that are politically well connected often get away with things that normal people don't so who can say.
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
Inuyasha wrote:
Orwell wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Orwell wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
pandabear wrote:
techstepgenr8tion wrote:
Dox47 wrote:
What is it with you and gay innuendo about republicans, panda? I mean its fine if that's what you're into, but shouldn't these posts be in the adult section, or perhaps on craigslist?
Maybe they just authentically get him hot. I suppose there's fetishes every which way in this day and age.
We are discussing authentic political issues--Republicans are libidinous maniacs who should not serve in government. There needs to be a formal separation of filth and State.
It wouldn't surprise me if the Democrats are doing far worse and the lamestream media is simply ignoring it. Furthermore, considering the left's tendency to fabricate "evidence" it wouldn't surprise me if Rick Perry isn't as tied to this as they are trying to lead us to believe.
Weiner sent out some flirtatious e-mails and a picture of himself in his underwear, and it was all the media could talk about for weeks, leading to him being forced out of Congress. Vitter was sleeping with hookers (which, unlike salacious e-mails, is actually a crime in this country) and it was a complete non-story. Not only did he not resign his office, but he didn't even have the decency to step down at the end of his term and the Republican party supported him to re-election.
Uh Orwell, from what I heard from multiple sources, is that apparently Weiner was sending pictures to underage girls where he wasn't wearing underwear.
Was that ever verified that he was sending his pictures to underage girls?
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
It was investigated and no wrongdoing on Weiner's part was found. And as far as I know, there were never even allegations of completely nude pictures being involved. That one is just a product of Inuyasha's fevered imagination.
Here are the facts: Weiner acted foolishly. Vitter acted criminally. Only Weiner had to face any consequences, while Vitter got off scot free.
The nude pictures to women was verified, the one to underage girls (as far as we know) have not been verified.
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/police-inves ... ware-girl/
As many people here have claimed, people that are politically well connected often get away with things that normal people don't so who can say.
And it's also true that people in the public eye can be easily slandered with unproven charges. Even a falsehood can stick.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Inuyasha wrote:
The nude pictures to women was verified,
I hadn't read that, but even if it is the case, whatever. It's still not illegal. Sleeping with hookers is.
Quote:
the one to underage girls (as far as we know) have not been verified.
And yet you still go ahead and cite it as though it were established fact. Worse than that, you combined two different accusations into one far worse. Sending nude pictures to adult women who were into it would have been stupid and slightly inappropriate- but not illegal. Sending such pictures to high-school girls would be a serious crime and would see him sitting behind bars. Despite police investigations, there is no hard evidence of any inappropriate contact between Weiner and underage girls.
You keep ignoring Vitter. Don't want to talk about that, eh? It would be inconvenient for you to admit that a conservative Republican is far more sexually immoral than Weiner ever will be, and actually broke the law without facing any consequences for his crimes?
_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH
Orwell wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
The nude pictures to women was verified,
I hadn't read that, but even if it is the case, whatever. It's still not illegal. Sleeping with hookers is.
Quote:
the one to underage girls (as far as we know) have not been verified.
And yet you still go ahead and cite it as though it were established fact. Worse than that, you combined two different accusations into one far worse. Sending nude pictures to adult women who were into it would have been stupid and slightly inappropriate- but not illegal. Sending such pictures to high-school girls would be a serious crime and would see him sitting behind bars. Despite police investigations, there is no hard evidence of any inappropriate contact between Weiner and underage girls.
You keep ignoring Vitter. Don't want to talk about that, eh? It would be inconvenient for you to admit that a conservative Republican is far more sexually immoral than Weiner ever will be, and actually broke the law without facing any consequences for his crimes?
I had to look up Vitter, and the fact he's from Louisanna kinda explains the situation...
In a perfect world Vitter would be out too, unfortunately Louisanna is rather well known for corruption (has been cleaned up a lot by Governor Bobby Jindal, but looks like there still needs to be a lot more cleaning). Sad part is that he could be thrown out and then end up right back in the Senate because he'd probably be voted right back into office. It also wouldn't surprise me if Clinton was also one of the clients.
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
Inuyasha wrote:
Orwell wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
The nude pictures to women was verified,
I hadn't read that, but even if it is the case, whatever. It's still not illegal. Sleeping with hookers is.
Quote:
the one to underage girls (as far as we know) have not been verified.
And yet you still go ahead and cite it as though it were established fact. Worse than that, you combined two different accusations into one far worse. Sending nude pictures to adult women who were into it would have been stupid and slightly inappropriate- but not illegal. Sending such pictures to high-school girls would be a serious crime and would see him sitting behind bars. Despite police investigations, there is no hard evidence of any inappropriate contact between Weiner and underage girls.
You keep ignoring Vitter. Don't want to talk about that, eh? It would be inconvenient for you to admit that a conservative Republican is far more sexually immoral than Weiner ever will be, and actually broke the law without facing any consequences for his crimes?
I had to look up Vitter, and the fact he's from Louisanna kinda explains the situation...
In a perfect world Vitter would be out too, unfortunately Louisanna is rather well known for corruption (has been cleaned up a lot by Governor Bobby Jindal, but looks like there still needs to be a lot more cleaning). Sad part is that he could be thrown out and then end up right back in the Senate because he'd probably be voted right back into office. It also wouldn't surprise me if Clinton was also one of the clients.
But it had never been reported on if Clinton had been. As his presidency is over, there was no reason not to report it, I doubt that he was. And the whole thing about Clinton is, he never has to pay for it - so why would he?
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Inuyasha wrote:
It also wouldn't surprise me if Clinton was also one of the clients.
One of Mr. Vitter's clients? Which Clinton? President, Mrs., or Ms.? Or, maybe the dog?
I suspect that having paid sexual relations with a member of the Clinton family would mark the beginning of the end of Mr. Vitter's career.
Kraichgauer wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Orwell wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
The nude pictures to women was verified,
I hadn't read that, but even if it is the case, whatever. It's still not illegal. Sleeping with hookers is.
Quote:
the one to underage girls (as far as we know) have not been verified.
And yet you still go ahead and cite it as though it were established fact. Worse than that, you combined two different accusations into one far worse. Sending nude pictures to adult women who were into it would have been stupid and slightly inappropriate- but not illegal. Sending such pictures to high-school girls would be a serious crime and would see him sitting behind bars. Despite police investigations, there is no hard evidence of any inappropriate contact between Weiner and underage girls.
You keep ignoring Vitter. Don't want to talk about that, eh? It would be inconvenient for you to admit that a conservative Republican is far more sexually immoral than Weiner ever will be, and actually broke the law without facing any consequences for his crimes?
I had to look up Vitter, and the fact he's from Louisanna kinda explains the situation...
In a perfect world Vitter would be out too, unfortunately Louisanna is rather well known for corruption (has been cleaned up a lot by Governor Bobby Jindal, but looks like there still needs to be a lot more cleaning). Sad part is that he could be thrown out and then end up right back in the Senate because he'd probably be voted right back into office. It also wouldn't surprise me if Clinton was also one of the clients.
But it had never been reported on if Clinton had been. As his presidency is over, there was no reason not to report it, I doubt that he was. And the whole thing about Clinton is, he never has to pay for it - so why would he?
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Bill Clinton still has a lot of powerful friends, and friends in the liberal media.
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
pandabear wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Bill Clinton still has a lot of powerful friends, and friends in the liberal media.
Is that why the "Liberal Media" was on him about Monica Lewinski for years on end?
They had to be dragged kicking and screaming to cover it and then decided it got them good ratings.
Here is a question: Why did it take the National Enquirer to expose the John Edwards affair?
