The feminisation of education or are boys getting dumber?
Ancalagon wrote:
hyperlexian wrote:
there is less demand for strippers, so it's not a good counterpoint.
The point is that there is good-paying work that has significant drawbacks. Demand doesn't have anything to do with it.
being a teacher or social worker has drawbacks too (high burnout rate). stripping is not really comparable to working on the rigs in any other way except that it doesn't require higher education. perhaps waitressing or working in retail could be comparable... again, but they don't pay much. there are not many unskilled jobs that women can do that pay very much... AND that have high demand.
Ancalagon wrote:
Quote:
and *someone* needs to work the rigs to keep the economy strong. strippers are not necessary in this way.
Necessity is also beside the point.
i disagree. necessity drives demand and keeps people employed in an industry. it is rare to be employed as a stripper.
Ancalagon wrote:
Quote:
strippers also don't usually make much money.
what is your question there? do you have some labour market statistics?
_________________
on a break, so if you need assistance please contact another moderator from this list:
viewtopic.php?t=391105
LKL wrote:
If a man can get a job that pays as well as the job a woman needs a batchelor's degree for, without any college at all, why should he go tens of thousands of dollars into debt if he's happy with that level of pay?
I agree that there is a marked difference in the numbers of boys vs. girls being accepted to university; I'm just not sure that it's as much of a problem as has been claimed. Certainly it's not some sort of feminist conspiracy to 'feminize' the curriculum at lower levels.
I agree that there is a marked difference in the numbers of boys vs. girls being accepted to university; I'm just not sure that it's as much of a problem as has been claimed. Certainly it's not some sort of feminist conspiracy to 'feminize' the curriculum at lower levels.
Actually there is at the Elementary school level, a girls fine motor skills develop earlier than a a boy's. They are now pushing things that a girl is able to do like cursive at an earlier age, but a boy just doesn't have the fine motor to do cursive yet.
If you set a little kid up to fail in kindergarden and pre-school, you've generally caused them to stop trying at the higher grade levels.
Inuyasha wrote:
LKL wrote:
If a man can get a job that pays as well as the job a woman needs a batchelor's degree for, without any college at all, why should he go tens of thousands of dollars into debt if he's happy with that level of pay?
I agree that there is a marked difference in the numbers of boys vs. girls being accepted to university; I'm just not sure that it's as much of a problem as has been claimed. Certainly it's not some sort of feminist conspiracy to 'feminize' the curriculum at lower levels.
I agree that there is a marked difference in the numbers of boys vs. girls being accepted to university; I'm just not sure that it's as much of a problem as has been claimed. Certainly it's not some sort of feminist conspiracy to 'feminize' the curriculum at lower levels.
Actually there is at the Elementary school level, a girls fine motor skills develop earlier than a a boy's. They are now pushing things that a girl is able to do like cursive at an earlier age, but a boy just doesn't have the fine motor to do cursive yet.
If you set a little kid up to fail in kindergarden and pre-school, you've generally caused them to stop trying at the higher grade levels.
Is that your excuse? They started pushing "cursive" on you at too tender of an age?
Inuyasha wrote:
LKL wrote:
If a man can get a job that pays as well as the job a woman needs a batchelor's degree for, without any college at all, why should he go tens of thousands of dollars into debt if he's happy with that level of pay?
I agree that there is a marked difference in the numbers of boys vs. girls being accepted to university; I'm just not sure that it's as much of a problem as has been claimed. Certainly it's not some sort of feminist conspiracy to 'feminize' the curriculum at lower levels.
I agree that there is a marked difference in the numbers of boys vs. girls being accepted to university; I'm just not sure that it's as much of a problem as has been claimed. Certainly it's not some sort of feminist conspiracy to 'feminize' the curriculum at lower levels.
Actually there is at the Elementary school level, a girls fine motor skills develop earlier than a a boy's. They are now pushing things that a girl is able to do like cursive at an earlier age, but a boy just doesn't have the fine motor to do cursive yet.
If you set a little kid up to fail in kindergarden and pre-school, you've generally caused them to stop trying at the higher grade levels.
Ok, let's accept everything you've said at face value:
the fact that boys are worse at everything (if you're right) still does not mean that there's a vast feminist conspiracy to 'feminize' education.
hyperlexian wrote:
stripping is not really comparable to working on the rigs in any other way except that it doesn't require higher education.
It pays well without requiring a degree. That's about it, but that's all the analogy needs.
Quote:
there are not many unskilled jobs that women can do that pay very much... AND that have high demand.
Is there a restriction that disallows women from working the rigs?
Quote:
i disagree. necessity drives demand and keeps people employed in an industry. it is rare to be employed as a stripper.
Economic necessity is relevant to economics, and we're talking about education.
Quote:
Ancalagon wrote:
Quote:
strippers also don't usually make much money.
what is your question there? do you have some labour market statistics?
Where you got this idea. Everything I know about this says the exact opposite.
_________________
"A dead thing can go with the stream, but only a living thing can go against it." --G. K. Chesterton
Inuyasha wrote:
Actually there is at the Elementary school level, a girls fine motor skills develop earlier than a a boy's. They are now pushing things that a girl is able to do like cursive at an earlier age, but a boy just doesn't have the fine motor to do cursive yet.
They should be teaching kids to type, not write cursive.
I know how to type, and I know how to use cursive. Guess which one I use every single day, and which one I can't remember last using.
_________________
"A dead thing can go with the stream, but only a living thing can go against it." --G. K. Chesterton
pandabear wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
LKL wrote:
If a man can get a job that pays as well as the job a woman needs a batchelor's degree for, without any college at all, why should he go tens of thousands of dollars into debt if he's happy with that level of pay?
I agree that there is a marked difference in the numbers of boys vs. girls being accepted to university; I'm just not sure that it's as much of a problem as has been claimed. Certainly it's not some sort of feminist conspiracy to 'feminize' the curriculum at lower levels.
I agree that there is a marked difference in the numbers of boys vs. girls being accepted to university; I'm just not sure that it's as much of a problem as has been claimed. Certainly it's not some sort of feminist conspiracy to 'feminize' the curriculum at lower levels.
Actually there is at the Elementary school level, a girls fine motor skills develop earlier than a a boy's. They are now pushing things that a girl is able to do like cursive at an earlier age, but a boy just doesn't have the fine motor to do cursive yet.
If you set a little kid up to fail in kindergarden and pre-school, you've generally caused them to stop trying at the higher grade levels.
Is that your excuse? They started pushing "cursive" on you at too tender of an age?
Actually, I have my Bachelors Degree, thank you kindly.
Ancalagon wrote:
hyperlexian wrote:
there is less demand for strippers, so it's not a good counterpoint.
The point is that there is good-paying work that has significant drawbacks. Demand doesn't have anything to do with it.
Quote:
and *someone* needs to work the rigs to keep the economy strong. strippers are not necessary in this way.
Necessity is also beside the point.
Quote:
strippers also don't usually make much money.
89717 - Strippers
Cut and arrange film into flats (layout sheets resembling a film negative of text in its final form) which are used to make plates. Prepare separate flat for each color. in precision printing.
both men and women can do it it only pays 14.50 an hour in my area and jobs are hard to get now with the shift to digital.
exotic dancers on the other hand make bank.
sometimes $300 $400 a night but somehow they can never make their cell phone bills
_________________
?We must not look at goblin men,
We must not buy their fruits:
Who knows upon what soil they fed
Their hungry thirsty roots??
http://jakobvirgil.blogspot.com/
Quote:
Actually there is at the Elementary school level, a girls fine motor skills develop earlier than a a boy's. They are now pushing things that a girl is able to do like cursive at an earlier age, but a boy just doesn't have the fine motor to do cursive yet.
Goes beyond that I think, girls mature faster mentally too (don't take that as a slight, dormice reach adulthood faster than human males too). It can be seen reflected in some of the more traditional cultures, women are considered legally adults at a much younger age than the men.
_________________
Crom is a grim, gloomy and unforgiving god, ever watching from atop his mountain in dark clouds and obscuring mists, ready to pass disapproving judgment on any and all. But he is said to value courage and tenacity in mortals, even if they ultimately fail.
Inuyasha wrote:
pandabear wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
LKL wrote:
If a man can get a job that pays as well as the job a woman needs a batchelor's degree for, without any college at all, why should he go tens of thousands of dollars into debt if he's happy with that level of pay?
I agree that there is a marked difference in the numbers of boys vs. girls being accepted to university; I'm just not sure that it's as much of a problem as has been claimed. Certainly it's not some sort of feminist conspiracy to 'feminize' the curriculum at lower levels.
I agree that there is a marked difference in the numbers of boys vs. girls being accepted to university; I'm just not sure that it's as much of a problem as has been claimed. Certainly it's not some sort of feminist conspiracy to 'feminize' the curriculum at lower levels.
Actually there is at the Elementary school level, a girls fine motor skills develop earlier than a a boy's. They are now pushing things that a girl is able to do like cursive at an earlier age, but a boy just doesn't have the fine motor to do cursive yet.
If you set a little kid up to fail in kindergarden and pre-school, you've generally caused them to stop trying at the higher grade levels.
Is that your excuse? They started pushing "cursive" on you at too tender of an age?
Actually, I have my Bachelors Degree, thank you kindly.
I know. You kept getting promoted along, until you finished your BA. And, you still have severe problems with basic English syntax.
pandabear wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
pandabear wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
LKL wrote:
If a man can get a job that pays as well as the job a woman needs a batchelor's degree for, without any college at all, why should he go tens of thousands of dollars into debt if he's happy with that level of pay?
I agree that there is a marked difference in the numbers of boys vs. girls being accepted to university; I'm just not sure that it's as much of a problem as has been claimed. Certainly it's not some sort of feminist conspiracy to 'feminize' the curriculum at lower levels.
I agree that there is a marked difference in the numbers of boys vs. girls being accepted to university; I'm just not sure that it's as much of a problem as has been claimed. Certainly it's not some sort of feminist conspiracy to 'feminize' the curriculum at lower levels.
Actually there is at the Elementary school level, a girls fine motor skills develop earlier than a a boy's. They are now pushing things that a girl is able to do like cursive at an earlier age, but a boy just doesn't have the fine motor to do cursive yet.
If you set a little kid up to fail in kindergarden and pre-school, you've generally caused them to stop trying at the higher grade levels.
Is that your excuse? They started pushing "cursive" on you at too tender of an age?
Actually, I have my Bachelors Degree, thank you kindly.
I know. You kept getting promoted along, until you finished your BA. And, you still have severe problems with basic English syntax.
Whatever.
Inuyasha wrote:
pandabear wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
pandabear wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
LKL wrote:
If a man can get a job that pays as well as the job a woman needs a batchelor's degree for, without any college at all, why should he go tens of thousands of dollars into debt if he's happy with that level of pay?
I agree that there is a marked difference in the numbers of boys vs. girls being accepted to university; I'm just not sure that it's as much of a problem as has been claimed. Certainly it's not some sort of feminist conspiracy to 'feminize' the curriculum at lower levels.
I agree that there is a marked difference in the numbers of boys vs. girls being accepted to university; I'm just not sure that it's as much of a problem as has been claimed. Certainly it's not some sort of feminist conspiracy to 'feminize' the curriculum at lower levels.
Actually there is at the Elementary school level, a girls fine motor skills develop earlier than a a boy's. They are now pushing things that a girl is able to do like cursive at an earlier age, but a boy just doesn't have the fine motor to do cursive yet.
If you set a little kid up to fail in kindergarden and pre-school, you've generally caused them to stop trying at the higher grade levels.
Is that your excuse? They started pushing "cursive" on you at too tender of an age?
Actually, I have my Bachelors Degree, thank you kindly.
I know. You kept getting promoted along, until you finished your BA. And, you still have severe problems with basic English syntax.
Whatever.
Exactly!
pandabear wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
pandabear wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
pandabear wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
LKL wrote:
If a man can get a job that pays as well as the job a woman needs a batchelor's degree for, without any college at all, why should he go tens of thousands of dollars into debt if he's happy with that level of pay?
I agree that there is a marked difference in the numbers of boys vs. girls being accepted to university; I'm just not sure that it's as much of a problem as has been claimed. Certainly it's not some sort of feminist conspiracy to 'feminize' the curriculum at lower levels.
I agree that there is a marked difference in the numbers of boys vs. girls being accepted to university; I'm just not sure that it's as much of a problem as has been claimed. Certainly it's not some sort of feminist conspiracy to 'feminize' the curriculum at lower levels.
Actually there is at the Elementary school level, a girls fine motor skills develop earlier than a a boy's. They are now pushing things that a girl is able to do like cursive at an earlier age, but a boy just doesn't have the fine motor to do cursive yet.
If you set a little kid up to fail in kindergarden and pre-school, you've generally caused them to stop trying at the higher grade levels.
Is that your excuse? They started pushing "cursive" on you at too tender of an age?
Actually, I have my Bachelors Degree, thank you kindly.
I know. You kept getting promoted along, until you finished your BA. And, you still have severe problems with basic English syntax.
Whatever.
Exactly!
Seriously, grow up Pandabear, you aren't funny, you're just plain annoying.
Ancalagon wrote:
It pays well without requiring a degree. That's about it, but that's all the analogy needs.
there are more analogous trades. ones that require no education and have a comparable number of women participating in it, and that are also economically necessary. therd is no reason to compare apples and oranges.
Ancalagon wrote:
Economic necessity is relevant to economics, and we're talking about education.
education is driven by the economy. community stakeholders including members of the dominant industries help determine the curriculum.
Ancalagon wrote:
Where you got this idea. Everything I know about this says the exact opposite.
the best stats i could find had exotic dancers on average (at all experience levels) earning what first-year rig pigs earned. but the stats are from different locations so are not exactly comparable. dunno where you are getting your information from.
p.s. to the people arguing about cursive writing... it is hardly even taught anymore. it's unnecessary.
_________________
on a break, so if you need assistance please contact another moderator from this list:
viewtopic.php?t=391105
Inuyasha wrote:
pandabear wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
pandabear wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
pandabear wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
LKL wrote:
If a man can get a job that pays as well as the job a woman needs a batchelor's degree for, without any college at all, why should he go tens of thousands of dollars into debt if he's happy with that level of pay?
I agree that there is a marked difference in the numbers of boys vs. girls being accepted to university; I'm just not sure that it's as much of a problem as has been claimed. Certainly it's not some sort of feminist conspiracy to 'feminize' the curriculum at lower levels.
I agree that there is a marked difference in the numbers of boys vs. girls being accepted to university; I'm just not sure that it's as much of a problem as has been claimed. Certainly it's not some sort of feminist conspiracy to 'feminize' the curriculum at lower levels.
Actually there is at the Elementary school level, a girls fine motor skills develop earlier than a a boy's. They are now pushing things that a girl is able to do like cursive at an earlier age, but a boy just doesn't have the fine motor to do cursive yet.
If you set a little kid up to fail in kindergarden and pre-school, you've generally caused them to stop trying at the higher grade levels.
Is that your excuse? They started pushing "cursive" on you at too tender of an age?
Actually, I have my Bachelors Degree, thank you kindly.
I know. You kept getting promoted along, until you finished your BA. And, you still have severe problems with basic English syntax.
Whatever.
Exactly!
Seriously, grow up Pandabear, you aren't funny, you're just plain annoying.
You should talk.
hyperlexian wrote:
there are more analogous trades.
If there is a denial of education to men, then it isn't made right by the availability of jobs that are unskilled but high paying, anymore than it would be if there were a denial of education to women. That was the point, and I didn't need a highly-analogous trade to make it.
Quote:
education is driven by the economy.
Economic factors influence it, to some degree, but that is not the same thing.
_________________
"A dead thing can go with the stream, but only a living thing can go against it." --G. K. Chesterton
