ruveyn wrote:
Cyanide wrote:
That family took a stupid risk by not paying for the fire department, and now they're facing the consequences.
What if it was up to everyone to decide for themselves whether or not to pay for the fire department? Would a bunch of people just not pay, and then expect to freeload off of the people who do pay if their house catches fire?
The "soak the rich" crowd are the true advocates of free loading. Unfortunately some of the rich are just high class free-loaders themselves. The people who are the true creators of wealth, the technicians, the engineers, the physical and chemical scientists do not get paid but a fraction of what they produce.
The financial operators, the manipulators of tokens are collecting disproportionately.
ruveyn
I'm not suggesting "soaking" the rich. I'm suggesting the people who can afford two homes and Birkins should have a higher tax rate, because they don't need their extra money. It's entirely possible this family simply didn't have $75 to spend on fire protection. As hard as that is to believe, money is just that tight for people nowadays. Because of the rich getting taxed less and all the dependable jobs being sent overseas. There are certain powers (the rich, libertarians) who want to make this country a third world hell because they don't want to pay taxes, and I don't think they should be allowed to do it. Declines in regulation of business, lowering of the tax rate, and rampant outsourcing are why America is no longer the prosperous country it was.
Actually, I might have been lying. Soak the rich! Hoo boy, college is radicalizing me. Here's a fun article:
http://www.salon.com/2011/12/08/the_ins ... ng_family/
Tell me this is fair or right.