15 Jun 2012, 5:31 pm
15 Jun 2012, 5:33 pm
15 Jun 2012, 5:35 pm
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
15 Jun 2012, 6:50 pm
15 Jun 2012, 7:13 pm
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
15 Jun 2012, 7:21 pm
16 Jun 2012, 6:35 am
16 Jun 2012, 1:00 pm
16 Jun 2012, 1:06 pm
16 Jun 2012, 1:19 pm
16 Jun 2012, 1:28 pm
simon_says wrote:
They appointed him for foreign nationals. THere was always a review for killing a US national abroad. The NSC has to chime in iirc.
We've been using less accurate cruise missile strikes for decades now. There is nothing new about killing civilians. In WWII we took out whole cities. Accuracy today is greatly improved but war is always going to be war. And we are at war with AQ. Congress authorized it.
We've been using less accurate cruise missile strikes for decades now. There is nothing new about killing civilians. In WWII we took out whole cities. Accuracy today is greatly improved but war is always going to be war. And we are at war with AQ. Congress authorized it.
A war that's not about defending Israel, or spreading democracy, or fighting "terrorism". They have detained American citizens over seas, and I feel it's a matter of time until they target citizens on the mainland, if they haven't already.
Wonder who is in charge of notifying your family in the event of your sudden disappearance?
16 Jun 2012, 1:34 pm
snapcap wrote:
simon_says wrote:
They appointed him for foreign nationals. THere was always a review for killing a US national abroad. The NSC has to chime in iirc.
We've been using less accurate cruise missile strikes for decades now. There is nothing new about killing civilians. In WWII we took out whole cities. Accuracy today is greatly improved but war is always going to be war. And we are at war with AQ. Congress authorized it.
We've been using less accurate cruise missile strikes for decades now. There is nothing new about killing civilians. In WWII we took out whole cities. Accuracy today is greatly improved but war is always going to be war. And we are at war with AQ. Congress authorized it.
A war that's not about defending Israel, or spreading democracy, or fighting "terrorism". They have detained American citizens over seas, and I feel it's a matter of time until they target citizens on the mainland, if they haven't already.
Wonder who is in charge of notifying your family in the event of your sudden disappearance?
You are entitled to your opinion.
If you are young you may not realize that we've been jousting with terrorism for 30 years. It's not make believe and it's become more serious over time. We need to find a way to affordably combat it and drones seem like a good tool.
16 Jun 2012, 2:53 pm
abstract wrote:
NorthPark wrote:
If I could vote...I'll probably vote for some one who is against Obama...That person happens to be Romney 
Which one is the lesser of teh two evils???
Which one is the lesser of teh two evils???
I would also vote for anyone but Obama if I could, including Vladimir Putin and Hugo Chavez. But I also don't like Rommney, based on his track record as governor and his support of socialized health care. Is Nader running again this year by chance?
Take a moment to look what the actual socialists are saying about Obama's/Romney's healthcare reforms. They hate it nearly as much as the Republicans. What he is proposing is in no way socialism.
Also, why would you vote for Hugo Chavez over Obama? Chavez most certainly believes in socialized healthcare.
16 Jun 2012, 2:57 pm
simon_says wrote:
snapcap wrote:
simon_says wrote:
They appointed him for foreign nationals. THere was always a review for killing a US national abroad. The NSC has to chime in iirc.
We've been using less accurate cruise missile strikes for decades now. There is nothing new about killing civilians. In WWII we took out whole cities. Accuracy today is greatly improved but war is always going to be war. And we are at war with AQ. Congress authorized it.
We've been using less accurate cruise missile strikes for decades now. There is nothing new about killing civilians. In WWII we took out whole cities. Accuracy today is greatly improved but war is always going to be war. And we are at war with AQ. Congress authorized it.
A war that's not about defending Israel, or spreading democracy, or fighting "terrorism". They have detained American citizens over seas, and I feel it's a matter of time until they target citizens on the mainland, if they haven't already.
Wonder who is in charge of notifying your family in the event of your sudden disappearance?
You are entitled to your opinion.
If you are young you may not realize that we've been jousting with terrorism for 30 years. It's not make believe and it's become more serious over time. We need to find a way to affordably combat it and drones seem like a good tool.
What is your opinion why terrorism and extremism began?
I don't just distrust the US merely because of all the campaigns they are engaged in all over the world, but because these campaigns have have an effect on the rights, freedoms and privacy of their citizens, whom have little to do with it. All these articles I post are nice, aren't they? Not in the eye's of the governments, which is why the internet will be heavily regulated in the future, unless people come together and demand that legislation is enacted to guarantee their internet is safe.
I completely understand that these wars are supposed to benefit our side, because if we don't pounce on the resources, someone else will, but people are going to have to sacrifice too much. I think we have already. Who is really the people benefiting from all this now?
16 Jun 2012, 6:16 pm
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
16 Jun 2012, 6:50 pm
