JWC wrote:
Are you serious?
You actually want to use THAT when asked for evidence, as a seasoned industry pro, THAT is the best you can offer?!
Lets take a look at your 'evidence' then.
Quote:
But now the "experts" claim "Global Warming." It's all just a theory, like Evolution, but after so many "experts" parrot the "truth" in the media, and even colleges and universities begin teaching it as truth, then it becomes "truth,' even when at best it's a 50-50 shot. I’ve read that 63% of those surveyed were “concerned” about Global Warming. Geez, don’t people even know how to ask the right questions anymore?
Oh dear, it's not really looking like a peer reviewed scientific with sound, well reasoned arguments backed up with decades of data and research is it?
Lets examine some of the claims made
Quote:
Bakken Formation
There’s enough crude to fully fuel the American economy for 40 years straight. And because this is light, sweet oil, those billions of barrels will cost Americans just $16 PER BARREL!
Assuming US demand stagnates, 40 years supply would require 300 billion barrels of refined, delivered fuel.
The USGS estimate that best case scenario for 'technically recoverable oil in place' is 3-4.3 billion barrels and that is before you lop 20-30 percent off refining the horrible shale muck.
Once again, out by a factor of at least one hundred and anyone that could refine shale and sell it profitably for $16 a barrel would currently be ruling the world, it's impossible.
Want to try again?
PS if you want a more realistic analysis of Bakken, try this:
http://www.theoildrum.com/node/3868It's from 2008 so the 111million barrels production in 50 years needs to revised up to about 150 million to match estimates for total production ever at year end 2012.
First of all, I'm at work right now, so I'm looking up my sources in a hurry. Second of all, you're completely ignoring that the figures I referenced from Von Mises actually came from the Wall Street Journal. Not an "ultra right-wing propaganda piece".