ruveyn wrote:
thomas81 wrote:
The main reason I don't think this is an Al Quaeda job-
If it was an Islamic bomber, they would have found blood or parts of the perpetrator's body. There wouldn't be anyone to 'arrest'.
Not so. You have heard of IEDs yes? They are exploded by timers or remotely by cell phone calls.
I agree this was not an an al queda job or any of the "leading" terrorist groups. Why? They have not claimed responsibility for this.
I think this was a lone wolf job and it might not be politically motivated. What is some sociopath were curious about the effect of a bomb going off on a crowed street in an American city, especially during a well televised sporting or athletic event. If this is done by a loose cannon let us hope he does not want to extend his experimentation to crowed subway cars during the rush hour.
ruveyn
IED's are used by the Taliban in Afghanistan because they are an effective means of guerrilla warfare against patrolling combatants. The Taliban also use assault rifles but whenever there is a shooting in America, no-ones first instinct is to think its by a jihadist.
With the attacks by islamists in civillian centres such as London, Madrid and New York the common denominator is that they've all been suicide attacks.