Page 4 of 4 [ 55 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4


What candidate are you nearest to? (US only)
Trump 4%  4%  [ 1 ]
Carson 4%  4%  [ 1 ]
Rubio 4%  4%  [ 1 ]
Bush 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Cruz 7%  7%  [ 2 ]
Fiorina 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Other Republican 7%  7%  [ 2 ]
Clinton 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Sanders 64%  64%  [ 18 ]
Other Democrat 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Other 11%  11%  [ 3 ]
Total votes : 28

Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

23 Oct 2015, 11:07 pm

Fnord wrote:
Keep your guns.

Vote for Fnord.


I will - depending on your stance on universal healthcare.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


envirozentinel
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator

User avatar

Joined: 16 Sep 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 17,226
Location: Keshron, Super-Zakhyria

24 Oct 2015, 2:42 am

Fnord's in his flivver!


_________________
Why is a trailer behind a car but ahead of a movie?


my blog:
https://sentinel63.wordpress.com/


Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,950
Location:      

24 Oct 2015, 8:51 am

Universal healthcare ... at this moment, it seems that everyone has the constitutional right to basic medical care on the government's dollar. That is, free health screenings, free inoculations, and free emergency care for life-threatening conditions.

Elective surgery? No free cosmetic enhancements, except to correct birth defects or deformities due to surgery or trauma.

Cataracts? Root-canals and caps? Tattoo removal? I'm still on the fence with these, but I'm still looking into it.

FNORD
For Better Health!


Your Vote Counts!


_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.


glebel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jul 2015
Age: 64
Posts: 1,665
Location: Mountains of Southern California

24 Oct 2015, 10:36 am

Fnord wrote:
Universal healthcare ... at this moment, it seems that everyone has the constitutional right to basic medical care on the government's dollar. That is, free health screenings, free inoculations, and free emergency care for life-threatening conditions.

Elective surgery? No free cosmetic enhancements, except to correct birth defects or deformities due to surgery or trauma.

Cataracts? Root-canals and caps? Tattoo removal? I'm still on the fence with these, but I'm still looking into it.

FNORD
For Better Health!


Your Vote Counts!

Where's it mention healthcare in the Constitution?


_________________
When everyone is losing their heads except you, maybe you don't understand the situation.


Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,950
Location:      

24 Oct 2015, 12:01 pm

glebel wrote:
Fnord wrote:
Universal healthcare ... at this moment, it seems that everyone has the constitutional right to basic medical care on the government's dollar. That is, free health screenings, free inoculations, and free emergency care for life-threatening conditions.

Elective surgery? No free cosmetic enhancements, except to correct birth defects or deformities due to surgery or trauma.

Cataracts? Root-canals and caps? Tattoo removal? I'm still on the fence with these, but I'm still looking into it.

FNORD
For Better Health!


Your Vote Counts!

Where's it mention healthcare in the Constitution?

Forgive my error, please. It is actually stated in the Declaration of Independence. "Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness" is a well-known phrase, and it gives three examples of the "unalienable rights" which the Declaration says has been given to all human beings by their Creator, and for which governments are created to protect. After all, how can anyone exercise these rights in poor health? How can anyone deny that health is necessary for life? How can anyone deny that not even the government should be allowed to withhold these inalienable rights?

FNORD!
For Greater Understanding!


Your Vote Counts!


_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.


Touretter
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 18 Mar 2006
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 408

24 Oct 2015, 3:50 pm

My top result was Bernie Sanders , at 95% . But close after him was Hillary Clinton , and Martin O'Malley , in just that order. http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/1458880784



yelekam
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jan 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 591

03 Nov 2015, 11:08 pm

Lukeda420 wrote:
sly279 wrote:

He's originally an independent. The only reason he's running as a Democrat is because of the way our system works. Third party candidates never win, they just end up splitting the vote.

I'm for Sanders but I'll vote for Clinton if she wins the primary.


Sometimes third party candidates are able to win in American elections. Though it s often less common than candidates from the main parties winning. And for the presidential races there haven't been succeeding candidates who were not part of or supported by one of the leading parties of their times.